1. Kinetics of Conformational Changes of the FKF1-LOV Domain upon Photoexcitation 
Yusuke Nakasone, Kazunori Zikihara, Satoru Tokutomi, Masahide Terazima 
Biophysical Journal 
Volume 99, Issue 11, Pages (December 2010)
DOI: /j.bpj
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
(a) Ribbon structures of simulated FKF1-LOV (magenta) and phy3-LOV domain (cyan). A three-dimensional structure prediction for FKF1-LOV was carried out using an automated comparative protein-modeling server, Swiss Model ( (20). The characteristic loop (Pro99–Leu107) is shown in yellow. (b) Multiple sequence alignment of several LOV domains. LOV sequences in the alignment include A. thaliana FKF1 (AF216523), phot2 (AAC27293), and Adiantum phy3 (BAA36192). Asterisks indicate 100% identity, and dots indicate similarity. The LOV core region is indicated by arrows. The characteristic loop region of FKF1-LOV is shown by red letters. The additional removed part of FKF1-LOV and the four inserted amino acid residues of phot2LOV2 are shown in purple and blue, respectively. The indicated amino acid sequence of FKF1 (Asp28–Arg174) was used in this experiment.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
A TG signal (gray broken line) of FKF1-LOV at 350 μM and q2 = 1.8 × 1010 m−2. The best-fitted curve, obtained using Eq. 1 and Eq. S3, is indicated by the solid line, which essentially overlaps with the observed signal.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
(a) TG signals (broken lines) of FKF1-LOV at q2-values of 1), 1.1 × 1013; 2), 1.4 × 1012; 3), 1.5 × 1011; and 4), 1.8 × 1010 m−2 (from left to right). The signals representing the molecular diffusion processes are shown, and these signals are normalized in the initial part of the diffusion signal. The best-fitted curves to the observed TG signals, obtained by Eq. S3, are shown by the solid black lines. The signals are well reproduced by the fitted curves. (b) The signals are normalized at the peak intensity and plotted against q2t. The times of the diffusion peaks are 1.8, 13, 100, and 870 ms, respectively, and are indicated in the figure.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4
Concentration dependence of the TG signal (dotted line) of FKF1-LOV measured at q2 = 2.8 × 1012 m−2. The concentrations were 350, 250, 160, and 99 μM. The signal intensities are normalized in the initial part of the diffusion signal. They are completely overlapped.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

6. Figure 5
(a) The absorption spectra of dark- and light-adapted states of FKF1-LOV (solid lines) and FKF1-LOV-NL (broken lines). (b) The absorption change associated with the dark recovery process of FKF1-LOV (open square) and FKF1-LOV-NL (open circle) monitored at 450 nm. The signals are well reproduced by a single exponential function (black lines are fitting curves).
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

7. Figure 6
(a) A TG signal (broken gray line) of the FKF1-LOV-NL mutant measured at q2 = 9.6 × 1010 m−2. The best-fitted curve to the observed TG signal (Eq. 2) is shown by the solid black line. The lower panel of the figure shows the magnified signal at the diffusion peak. (b) The q2 dependence of the TG signal of the FKF1-LOV-NL mutant measured at q2 = 8.1 × 1011 m−2 and 9.6 × 1010 m−2.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

8. Figure 7
CD spectra of FKF1-LOV and FKF-LOV-NL before (green solid line for FKF1-LOV and pink solid line for FKF1-LOV-NL) and after (red broken line for FKF1-LOV and blue broken line for FKF1-LOV-NL) light illumination.
Biophysical Journal  , DOI: ( /j.bpj )
Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions