1. Tracking Outcomes - Wellbeing Web
EEI Network Event
Feb 2014
Neil McKinlay, FV WSA Project Manager

2. Tracking GIRFEC Outcomes
Young Person’s views and their own scoring.
Used by “specialist” services:
Early and Effective Intervention
Extension of EEI to 16 & 17s;
Diversion from Prosecution for 16 & 17s.
Based on Angus model.

3. Wellbeing Web

4. GIRFEC Prompt Cards

5. Young Person A (17)
Mr A is a 17 year old, he resides with his father. Mr A left school at age 16 with no formal qualifications. Mr A was known to Social Work previously via the Substance misuse team and has previously completed EEI programme with Barnardo's.
Mr A was referred to my service (Youth Justice WSA Project Worker) on the 29 August 2013 at the EEI/Diversion group.
Mr A was diverted from prosecution for Theft of a motor vehicle, driving without insurance / licence.
Initially Mr A did not attend the appointments offered but after a little perseverance he began to engage.
At Mr A's initial contact he admitted the offence and took responsibility for his actions. Mr A was very embarrassed about this offence and thought that it would 'ruin' his reputation. We discussed the programme of intervention and agreed to have weekly contact.
I use the wellbeing web at the initial contact, this is a good tool to use to start conversations about certain areas of the young persons life, to gain a better understanding of the areas support is required.
Safe - Mr A scored himself 10 throughout our work
Healthy - Mr A scored himself 10 throughout our work
Achieving - At initial contact Mr A scored himself 4, Mr A explained this was because he was no longer at school and was doing very little during the day. Over the 7 weeks I supported Mr A to apply for a college course in Construction. At the end of the programme Mr A scored himself 7 for achieving.
Nurtured - At initial contact Mr A scored himself 9, he felt his parents were 'disappointed' with him following his offence. Over the 7 weeks we discussed the consequences of his offence for himself and his family. At the end of the programme Mr A scored 10.
Active - At initial contact Mr A scored himself 6, similarly to achieving Mr A explained this was because he was doing very little through the day. Mr A met with me regularly and worked with his Dad occasionally through the week. At the end of the programme he scored himself 9.
Respected - Mr A scored himself 10 throughout our work.
Responsible - At initial contact Mr A scored himself 6, due to his offence he felt he couldn't score himself higher. Mr A complied fully with the work, gained a college course and kept to the 'rules' his parents wished of him. At the end of the programme he scored himself 8.
Included - At initial contact Mr A scored himself 8, similarly to nurtured Mr A felt his parents were 'disappointed' in his actions and therefore he was not including himself, over the 7 week period we discussed how Mr A felt in relation to his family and I encouraged him to reengage in family life. At the end of the programme Mr A scored himself 10.