1. 802.11 Nov 2009 Closing Plenary Motions
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Nov 2009 Closing Plenary Motions
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

2. May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Abstract
This document is a composite of all sub-group motions that are for information, or may be brought at the November 2009 closing plenary.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

3. Nov 2009
WG telecons
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

4. Teleconferences Nov 2009 Group Dates Start Time Duration Editors
May 2006
Teleconferences
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Group
Dates
Start Time
Duration
Editors
<none scheduled>
12:00 ET (noon)
1 Hour
TGmb
Every Fri, starting Jan 29 to April 2
11:00 ET
1.5 Hours
TGp
Every Thu
15:00 ET
2 Hours
TGs
Wed Dec 2; Jan 6, 13
16:00 ET
TGu
Wed Dec 2, 9, 16; Jan 6, 13
TGv
Tue Dec 1, 8, 15; Jan 12
TGz
Thu Dec 10; Jan 14
14:00 ET
TGaa
Mon Nov 30; Dec 14; Jan 11
TGac
Thu Dec 17; Jan 14
Thu Dec 3
Thu Dec 17
Thu Jan 7
21:00 ET
20:00 ET
TGad
Thu Dec 10; Jan 7
10:00 ET
Regulatory AHC
TVWS SG
Tue Jan 12
ARC
Tue <none scheduled>
12:00 ET
JTC1 AHC
QoSMAN SG
Thu Jan 14
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

5. Nov 2009
TGmb
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

6. Scheduling is Hard! Letter ballots should not close on major holidays
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Scheduling is Hard!
Letter ballots should not close on major holidays
Significant vacation activity in December
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

7. Recap of TGmb Letter Ballot Debate
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Recap of TGmb Letter Ballot Debate
15 days is not enough
~ 700 comment resolutions, including several global style changes
802.11w-2009 has been rolled in (~ 100 pages)
Significant editorial work before beginning ballot
~ 200 comment resolutions approved at this meeting
Start date of ballot is not yet clear
Scheduling goals
End before January 2009 interim meeting
Avoid holidays and holiday vacations
TG proposed motion
Specified an end date so that early completion of editorial work led to more ballot time
Targeted at a 4-week ballot time
Motion revised at CAC to include a minimum ballot length
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

8. Motion – TGmb letter ballot
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Motion – TGmb letter ballot
Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the first working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D1.0, Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 2.0 incorporating these resolutions and, Approve a Working Group Recirculation Ballot to start as soon as possible, ending on Friday, January 8, 2010 asking the question "Should P802.11REVmb D2.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?"
[ Informative Note: TGmb anticipates the start of the ballot period will be approximately December 11, leading to a 4-week ballot period. ]
Moved by Matthew Gast on behalf of TGmb
(TGmb motion: Moved by Adrian Stephens, seconded by Harry Worstell; result: 9 yes / 0 no / 0 abstain)
Moved: <name>, Seconded: <name>, Result: y-n-a]
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

9. Motion – TGmb letter ballot
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Motion – TGmb letter ballot
Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the first working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D1.0, Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 2.0 incorporating these resolutions and, Approve a Working Group Recirculation Ballot
to start as soon as possible
to last at least 20 days
ending, if possible, on Friday, January 8, 2010
asking the question "Should P802.11REVmb D2.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?"
Moved by Matthew Gast , Seconded Clint Chaplin
Result: 41,0,1, passes
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

10. Nov 2009
TGs
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

11. Scheduling is Hard! Letter ballots should not close on major holidays
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Scheduling is Hard!
Letter ballots should not close on major holidays
Significant vacation activity in December
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

12. Moved by Theodorus Denteneer on behalf of TGs TGs vote:
Nov 2009
Motion:
Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB#147 on P802.11s Draft 3.0 as contained in document 11-09/471r23,
Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 4.0 incorporating these resolutions and,
Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11s Draft 4.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
Moved by Theodorus Denteneer on behalf of TGs
TGs vote:
Moved: Guido Hiertz Seconded: Dan Harkins Result: y: 9-n: 0-a: 0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

13. Moved by Theodorus Denteneer, seconded Dorothy Stanley TGs vote:
Nov 2009
Motion:
Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB#147 on P802.11s Draft 3.0 as contained in document 11-09/471r23,
Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 4.0 incorporating these resolutions and,
Approve a Working Group Recirculation Ballot of at least 15 days asking the question “Should P802.11s Draft 4.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
Moved by Theodorus Denteneer, seconded Dorothy Stanley
TGs vote:
Moved: Guido Hiertz Seconded: Dan Harkins Result: y: 9-n: 0-a: 0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

14. Moved by Theodorus Denteneer, seconded Dorothy Stanley
Nov 2009
Motion:
Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB#147 on P802.11s Draft 3.0 as contained in document 11-09/471r23,
Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 4.0 incorporating these resolutions and,
Approve a Working Group Recirculation Ballot of at least 15 days, with a target close date of Jan 8th 2010, asking the question “Should P802.11s Draft 4.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
Moved by Theodorus Denteneer, seconded Dorothy Stanley
Result: 41,0,2, passes
TGs vote:
Moved: Guido Hiertz Seconded: Dan Harkins Result: y: 9-n: 0-a: 0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

15. Nov 2009
TGaa
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

16. doc.: IEEE /1003r0
September 2008
November 2007
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /2752r1
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Motion-7
Move to approve document 09/926r5 as the guiding document describing the work that needs to be done in aa and 802.1Qat
Moved: Ganesh Venkatesan on behalf of TGaa
Passes without objection
In TGaa:
Moved: Alex Ashley
Seconded: Graham Smith
Vote: 6-0-3
Motion passes
Slide 16
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Alex Ashley, NDS Ltd
Page 16
Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems
Page 16
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

17. Nov 2009
TVWS SG
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

18. Nov 2009
Motion #1
Believing that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in the documents referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines,
Request that the PAR and the Five Criteria contained in 11-09/934r8 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom.
Moved by Richard Kennedy
Seconded by Peter Ecclesine
Result: 43,0,3 passes
In the SG:
Moved by Peter Ecclesine, seconded by Carl Kain
Result: unanimous (19 members in the room)
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

19. Nov 2009
Motion #2
Move to extend the TVWS SG to the end of the March plenary
Moved by: Richard Kennedy on behalf of the TVWS SG
Seconded by: Peter Ecclesine
Vote: 47,0,0, passes
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

20. Nov 2009
JTC1 AHC
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

21. Nov 2009
JTC1 ad hoc approved a liaison to SC6 relating to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N 14123
Motion
The IEEE JTC1 ad hoc recommends to the IEEE WG and IEEE 802 ExCom that the letter contained in r1 be liaised to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6. This letter provides a response to some of the material liaised to the IEEE staff in ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N The letter should be sent to the SC6 Secretariat. It should also be CC’ed to the individuals and organisations addressed by the that notified IEEE staff about ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N IEEE staff should be authorised to make any necessary editorial changes
Moved: David Hunter
Seconded: Jerry Thrasher
Result 11/0/0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

22. Nov 2009
WG will consider a liaison to SC6 relating to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N 14123
Motion
The IEEE JTC1 ad hoc and IEEE WG recommends to the IEEE 802 ExCom that the letter contained in r1 be liaised to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6. This letter provides a response to some of the material liaised to the IEEE staff in ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N The letter should be sent to the SC6 Secretariat. It should also be CC’ed to the individuals and organisations addressed by the that notified IEEE staff about ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N IEEE staff should be authorised to make any necessary editorial changes
Moved: Andrew Myles
Seconded: Peter Ecclesine
Result: 42,0,1, passes
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

23. Nov 2009
JTC1 ad hoc approved a liaison to SC6 relating to plans to use the PSDO
Motion
The IEEE JTC1 ad hoc recommends to the IEEE WG and IEEE 802 ExCom that the letter contained in r1 be liaised to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6. This letter documents recent and planned future activities in the IEEE Working Group, flags an intention to submit certain documents to ISO/IEC using the PDSO process, and offers JTC1 and SC6 National Bodies the opportunity to submit comments into the Sponsor Ballot process. The letter should be sent to the SC6 Secretariat. The IEEE Working Group Chair should be authorised to make any necessary editorial changes.
Moved: Dan Harkins
Seconded: Jim Raab
Result 12/0/0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

24. Nov 2009
WG will consider a liaison to SC6 relating to plans to use the PSDO
Motion
The IEEE JTC1 ad hoc and IEEE WG recommends to IEEE 802 ExCom that the letter contained in r1 be liaised to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6. This letter documents recent and planned future activities in the IEEE Working Group, flags an intention to submit certain documents to ISO/IEC using the PDSO process, and offers JTC1 and SC6 National Bodies the opportunity to submit comments into the Sponsor Ballot process. The letter should be sent to the SC6 Secretariat. The IEEE Working Group Chair should be authorised to make any necessary editorial changes.
Moved: Andrew Myles
Seconded: Ian Sherlock
Result: 41,0,1, passes
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

25. Nov 2009
QoS MAN SG New Business
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

26. Motion to approve QOSMAN PAR comment resolutions
July 2009
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
Motion to approve QOSMAN PAR comment resolutions
Move to accept the QOSMAN PAR comment resolutions in document
Moved: Michael Montemurro
Seconded: Jon Rosdahl
Vote: 41,0,1 passes
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Page 26
McCann et al. (RIM)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

27. April 2009
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
PAR and 5C Approval
Believing that the QoSMAN PAR and Five Criteria contained in the documents referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines,
Request that the QoSMAN PAR and the Five Criteria contained in document qm-qosman-par-nescom-form-plus-5cs.doc be forwarded to the WG for approval of the full Working Group.
Moved: Michael Montemurro
Second: Jon Rosdahl
Vote: 43,0,1, passes
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Page 27
Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

28. July 2009
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
Nov 2009
QoSMAN SG Extension
Request the IEEE 802 LMSC to extend the QoSMAN Study Group.
Moved by: Michael Montemurro
Second: Jon Rosdahl
Vote: 39,0,1, passes
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Page 28
McCann et al. (RIM)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

29. Nov 2009
TTA Liaison Request
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

30. Nov 2009
Proposed Motion
The IEEE Working Group requests that the 802 EC maintain a liaison with TTA in support of ANNEX B 'Technical Cooperation Agreement' of the TTA/IEEE-SA MOU conditional upon the MOU being signed.
Moved: Peter Ecclesine
Seconded: Michael Montemurro
Result: 39,0,1, passes
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation