1. 802.11 Mar 2010 Closing Plenary Motions
May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
March 2010
Mar 2010 Closing Plenary Motions
Date:
Authors:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

2. May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
March 2010
Abstract
This document is a composite of all sub-group motions that are for information, or may be brought at the March 2010 closing plenary.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

3. March 2010
WG telecons
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

4. Teleconferences March 2010 Thu April 29 Tue Mar 30; Apr 13, 27; May 11
doc.: IEEE /0528r0
March 2010
Group
Dates
Start Time
Duration
S1G
Mon April 5, 26 (conditional on EC)
16:30 ET
1 Hour
TGmb
May 7, 28; June 4, 11, 25; July 9
11:00 ET
1.5 Hours
TGp
Every Thu
15:00 ET
2 Hours
TGs
Thu April 1; May 6, 13 Wed April 28
TGu
Wed Mar 31, Apr 6, Apr 28, May 5, May 12
TGv
Thu April 8, 15, 29; May 6, 13
Tue April 20
14:00 ET
TGz
Thu April 8, 15, 22, 29; May 6, 13
TGaa
Mar 29, Apr 12, Apr 26, May 10
TGac
Thu April 8 (PHY)
Thu April 8 (MAC)
Thu April 15 (MU-MIMO)
Thu April 22 (Coex)
Thu April 29 (MU-MIMO)
11: :00 ET
10: :00 ET
20: :00 ET
TGad
Thu April 29
10:00 ET
TGae
April 8, April 22, and May 6
TGaf
Tue Mar 30; Apr 13, 27; May 11
20:00 ET
Regulatory AHC
Thu April 8
12:00 ET (noon)
ARC
<none scheduled>
JTC1 AHC
Mon from Apr 12
18:00ET
Smart Grid
Wed starting Mar 24
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

5. March 2010
TGmb
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

6. Motion – REVmb 3.0 Recirculation Ballot
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
March 2010
Motion – REVmb 3.0 Recirculation Ballot
Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the first working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D2.0,
Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 3.0 incorporating these resolutions and,
Approve a 25 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11REVmb D3.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
Moved: Matthew Gast on behalf of TGmb [ TG result: Moved M. Montemurro / 2nd A. Stephens; 10/0/0 ]
John Doe, Some Company
John Doe, Some Company

7. March 2010
TGp
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

8. 802.11 EC Motion – Conditional Approval to send P802.11p to RevCom
March 2010
EC Motion – Conditional Approval to send P802.11p to RevCom
Request the IEEE 802 Executive Committee for conditional approval to forward P802.11p D11.0 to RevCom.
P802.11p had a 96% approval on the last Recirculation Sponsor Ballot. In this ballot, there were 5 disapprove voters (4 of whom have since indicated satisfaction with the resolution of their comments) and 28 unsatisfied comments, all from the remaining disapprove voter.
CRC vote on the Motion Passed: 14 y, 0 n, 1 a
Moved: Lee Armstrong on behalf of TGp
Seconded: Bill Marshall
Yes No Abstain
Lee Armstrong (US DoT)

9. March 2010
TGs
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

10. Moved by Theodorus Denteneer on behalf of TGs TGs vote:
March 2010
Motion:
Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB#159 on P802.11s Draft 4.0 as contained in document 11-10/32r12,
Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 5.0 incorporating these resolutions and,
Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11s Draft 5.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
Moved by Theodorus Denteneer on behalf of TGs
TGs vote:
Moved: Dave Halasz: Seconded: Michael Bahr Result:
Dee Denteneer

11. Motion Move to hold a TGs ad hoc on May 13-15 in Tokyo.
March 2010
Motion
Move to hold a TGs ad hoc on May in Tokyo.
Moved by Dee Denteneer on behalf of TGs
In the TG:
Moved: Guido Hiertz Seconder: Kazuyuki Sakoda
Approved by unanimous consent
Dee Denteneer

12. IEEE 802.11 Motions for EC Bruce Kraemer March 2010
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

13. March 2010
Study Group Motion
Request approval by IEEE 802 LMSC to form an Study Group for Sub 1 GHz license-exempt operation (as described in doc 11-09/1313r5) with the intent of creating a PAR and five criteria.
Moved: Bruce Kraemer
Seconded:
In the WG: Passed 34,0,2
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

14. March 2010
Sub 1 GHz and IEEE
Current IEEE standard does not cover below 1 GHz, such as the MHz ISM band.
This band does have an advantage over 2.4 GHz, 3.65 GHz and 5 GHz because of range per transmit power.
Better free space propagation loss
Better clutter propagation loss. i.e. trees, telephone poles
Increase in battery life
A disadvantage is the limited bandwidth.
However sufficient for 5, 10 and 20 MHz OFDM
Down to 1.25 MHz wide channel also useful
Smaller channels also allow for bandwidth sharing
David Halasz, Aclara

15. Conditional Approval to send P802.11p to RevCom
March 2010
Conditional Approval to send P802.11p to RevCom
Request the IEEE 802 Executive Committee for conditional approval to forward P802.11p D11.0 to RevCom.
P802.11p had a 96% approval on the last Recirculation Sponsor Ballot. In this ballot, there were 5 disapprove voters (4 of whom have since indicated satisfaction with the resolution of their comments) and 28 unsatisfied comments, all from the remaining disapprove voter.
Moved: Bruce Kraemer
Seconded:
Yes No Abstain
In the WG: passed <yes>, <no>, <abstain>
Lee Armstrong (US DoT)

16. Report on request for conditional approval to send P802.11p to RevCom
March 2010
Report on request for conditional approval to send P802.11p to RevCom
See:
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation