Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1 (a) The distribution of paternity amongst 84 hatchlings sampled at a HDS on the western coastline of Little ... Figure 1 (a) The distribution.

Published byMaria Kähkönen Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1 (a) The distribution of paternity amongst 84 hatchlings sampled at a HDS on the western coastline of Little ... Figure 1 (a) The distribution."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1 (a) The distribution of paternity amongst 84 hatchlings sampled at a HDS on the western coastline of Little ... Figure 1 (a) The distribution of paternity amongst 84 hatchlings sampled at a HDS on the western coastline of Little Cayman. Bar heights illustrate the contributions of individual males to sampled clutches in terms of number of offspring sired (gold bars) and number of clutches contributed to (blue bars). (b) The rate of MP detected among clutches is compared between 10 nests sampled at the HDS and belonging to resident nesters and 40 nests sampled IW. Blue slices represent the proportion of clutches that are polyandrous and gold slices represent the proportion of clutches that are monandrous. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 24 October 2018, Pages 181–193, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

2 Figure 2 Fifty clutches illustrating relative sire contributions detected amongst offspring sampled (range = 3–18). ... Figure 2 Fifty clutches illustrating relative sire contributions detected amongst offspring sampled (range = 3–18). Gold and blue bars represent the number of hatchlings sired by the primary and secondary sires in a clutch, respectively, and gray and red bars represent escaped and unhatched hatchlings, respectively, for which paternity could not be inferred. Significantly skewed contributions (P < 0.05) are indicated with an * in clutches with sampling rates of at least 0.8. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 24 October 2018, Pages 181–193, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

3 Figure 3 (a) Ract values for the primary (blue) and secondary (gold) sire in 10 clutches sampled at a focal ... Figure 3 (a) R<sub>act</sub> values for the primary (blue) and secondary (gold) sire in 10 clutches sampled at a focal HDS, plotted against a range of R<sub>exp</sub> values calculated between each resident dam and 14 candidate sires sampled at the site (gray dots = mean R<sub>exp</sub>). (b) Histograms summarizing simulated datasets of 10,000 mean R<sub>exp</sub> (gold) and 10,000 mean R<sub>act</sub> (blue) estimates for n = 36 unique dams sampled from the population. The mean of the simulated R<sub>act</sub> distribution is indicated with a dotted line. Observed mean R values do not differ significantly from the null distribution in a 2-tailed significance test (p = 0.635). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 24 October 2018, Pages 181–193, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

4 Figure 4 Boxplots illustrating the distribution of average (a) SH, (b) HL, (c) F, and (d) allelic counts among Figure 4 Boxplots illustrating the distribution of average (a) SH, (b) HL, (c) F, and (d) allelic counts among 31 monandrous clutches (blue) and 19 polyandrous clutches (gold). Asterisks indicate the significance level of P values obtained from Wilcoxon rank-sum tests (NS = nonsignificant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 24 October 2018, Pages 181–193, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Download ppt "Figure 1 (a) The distribution of paternity amongst 84 hatchlings sampled at a HDS on the western coastline of Little ... Figure 1 (a) The distribution."

Similar presentations

Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.

Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.
Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment

Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment
Figure 1 Waveforms of example stimuli illustrating how within-individual variation was manipulated. Invariant signals ... Figure 1 Waveforms of example.

Figure 1 Waveforms of example stimuli illustrating how within-individual variation was manipulated. Invariant signals ... Figure 1 Waveforms of example.
Figure 1 Overall lag-cumulative exposure–response relationships between air temperature and myocardial infarction ... Figure 1 Overall lag-cumulative exposure–response.

Figure 1 Overall lag-cumulative exposure–response relationships between air temperature and myocardial infarction ... Figure 1 Overall lag-cumulative exposure–response.
Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal success of hatchling turtles as a function of the interaction between hatchling body ... Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal.

Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal success of hatchling turtles as a function of the interaction between hatchling body ... Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Survival plot showing the detection rate of experimental hosts as the proportion butterflies still searching ... Figure 1 Survival plot showing.

Figure 1 Survival plot showing the detection rate of experimental hosts as the proportion butterflies still searching ... Figure 1 Survival plot showing.
Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals.

Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals.
Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.

Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.
Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs per gram = epg) (A through C) and corresponding infection probabilities estimated by ... Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs.

Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs per gram = epg) (A through C) and corresponding infection probabilities estimated by ... Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs.
Figure 1 Data-selection process

Figure 1 Data-selection process
Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access
Figure 1. Medicaid receipt and ACA favorability

Figure 1. Medicaid receipt and ACA favorability
Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.

Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.
Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.

Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.
Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.

Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.
Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build retreats and 2-dimensional capture webs on (a) trees and (b) fences, 2 very ... Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build.

Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build retreats and 2-dimensional capture webs on (a) trees and (b) fences, 2 very ... Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google