1. Proposal for Visualisation of Groundwater Bodies
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA

2. Content of Presentation‏
WFD Art. V Groundwater body data gap analysis
Case study of GWB visualisation
Recommendation
Request
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA

3. WFD Art. V Groundwater body data gap analysis ‏
Article 5 centroid Data Delivery Status (JRC Dataset)‏
Article 5 polygon data delivery status (CDR upload)
Article V centroids and polygon availability
Conclusions
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA 3

4. Article 5 centroid Data Delivery Status (JRC Dataset)‏
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA 4

5. Article 5 polygon data delivery status (CDR upload)‏
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA 5

6. Article V centroids and polygon availability
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA 6

7. Conclusions‏
Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Latvia, Netherlands, Sweden, Slovakia provided complete and matching official polygon and centroid datasets
There are centroid dataset available for Austria and Slovenia; polygon datasets can be used if officially approved by those member states.
Cyprus, Denmark, Germany, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal and Spain national polygon and centroid datasets need either correction or verification by member states
United Kingdom has provided centroid data and should provide a polygon dataset.
Bulgaria, Finland, Greece, Italy, Malta, and Romania have not provided any data and should be asked to provide national centroid and polygon datasets.
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA 7

8. Groundwater Bodies Delineation in Member States‏ (case study)
Czech Republic – 3 GWBs layers
Slovak Republic – 3 GWBs layers
Germany – 2 GWBs layers
Poland – 1 GWBs layer
Austria – 3 GWBs layers
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA 8

9. Current situation - all layers together (CR)
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA 9

10. Visualisation of Groundwater Bodies in International RBDs‏ (case study)
Risk assessment of groundwater bodies in International Elbe River Basin District (Report 2005, International Commission for the Protection of the Elbe River)
Upper layer of GWBs:
not at risk
at risk
Main layer of GWBs:
Deep layer of GWBs:
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA 10

11. Different Types of Groundwater Body Layers (case study)‏
Localy delineated quarternary deposits (CR, SK)
Main layer of groudwater bodies – the entire area of RBD (all MS)
Deep hydrogeological structures – localy delineated (DE, CR, AT)
Thermal waters (SK, AT)
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA 11

12. Proposal of Groundwater Bodies visualisation in Central Europe
Join the same types of groundwater bodies
Groundwater reference layer: uppermost horizon = quarternary alluvial deposits (> 100 km2) + main layer
WISE viewer map – possibility of visualisation of all groundwater layers
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA 12

13. Proposal of Groundwater Bodies visualisation in Central Europe13

14. Request
Member states provide assignment of GWBs to horizons or provide GWBs layers separately
Member states identify different types of GWB layers or horizons
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA 14

15. Thank you for your attention
Working Group C, Paris
Hana Prchalova, Vit Kodeš, CENIA