Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following ... Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated.

Published byElsa Aasen Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following ... Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following ... Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following Chittka (b) Spectral reflectance measures for the colored stimuli used in the experiment, in comparison to the background color of the apparatus. The human colors are identified as 1) orange, 2) yellow, 3) dark blue, and 4) purple. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

2 Figure 1 Measured differences in preference for the stimulus colors chosen for the experiment. The total percent ... Figure 1 Measured differences in preference for the stimulus colors chosen for the experiment. The total percent chosen for each color averaged across all bees is shown. The x axis represents the color preference in relation to the focal color orange, with orange and purple representing a high preference difference, blue and orange representing a medium preference difference, and yellow and orange as the equal preference treatments. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

3 Figure 3 Design of trials
Figure 3 Design of trials. The y axis is the level of reward, whereas the x axis is choice number. One resource ... Figure 3 Design of trials. The y axis is the level of reward, whereas the x axis is choice number. One resource provides a steady, mediocre reward whereas the second resource fluctuated between a poor reward and a good reward every 20 trials. The orange focal resource could be either fluctuating or stable in reward, and could be paired either yellow, blue, or purple to provide an equal, medium, or high level of difference. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

4 Figure 8 Errors of learning
Figure 8 Errors of learning. (a) In a fluctuating patch, the proportion of bee choices to stay with the high rewarding ... Figure 8 Errors of learning. (a) In a fluctuating patch, the proportion of bee choices to stay with the high rewarding color once sampled (win-stay), as opposed to choosing to the color providing the steady (win-shift), but mediocre resource. The x axis represents the state of the focal color. (b) In a fluctuating patch, the proportion of bee choices to abandon a high rewarding color once sampled and instead return to the color providing the steady, mediocre resource. The x axis represents the state of the focal color orange. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

5 Figure 4 Proportional choices of the bees on the focal color orange
Figure 4 Proportional choices of the bees on the focal color orange. The x axis reflects averages across blocks of Figure 4 Proportional choices of the bees on the focal color orange. The x axis reflects averages across blocks of 10 choices. The fluctuating reward changes every 20 choices starting in a bad state in trial block 1. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

6 Figure 5 Statistically significant interaction of preference level and reward type upon the sampling window (number of ... Figure 5 Statistically significant interaction of preference level and reward type upon the sampling window (number of trials between sampling events). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

7 Figure 6 Significant interaction of preference level and reward type on the proportion of choices of the fluctuating ... Figure 6 Significant interaction of preference level and reward type on the proportion of choices of the fluctuating resource. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

8 Figure 7 Full interaction of preference level, reward type and experience (blocks of trials). The interaction of block ... Figure 7 Full interaction of preference level, reward type and experience (blocks of trials). The interaction of block with preference type is statistically significant. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Download ppt "Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following ... Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated."

Similar presentations

Figure 1 Measured differences in preference for the stimulus colors chosen for the experiment. The total percent chosen for each color averaged across.

Figure 1 Measured differences in preference for the stimulus colors chosen for the experiment. The total percent chosen for each color averaged across.
Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.

Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.
Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment

Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment
Figure 1 Waveforms of example stimuli illustrating how within-individual variation was manipulated. Invariant signals ... Figure 1 Waveforms of example.

Figure 1 Waveforms of example stimuli illustrating how within-individual variation was manipulated. Invariant signals ... Figure 1 Waveforms of example.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Survival plot showing the detection rate of experimental hosts as the proportion butterflies still searching ... Figure 1 Survival plot showing.

Figure 1 Survival plot showing the detection rate of experimental hosts as the proportion butterflies still searching ... Figure 1 Survival plot showing.
Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals.

Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals.
Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.

Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.
Figure 1 We consider a scenario where the distributions of signals under safe or dangerous situations mean that a ... Figure 1 We consider a scenario where.

Figure 1 We consider a scenario where the distributions of signals under safe or dangerous situations mean that a ... Figure 1 We consider a scenario where.
Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs per gram = epg) (A through C) and corresponding infection probabilities estimated by ... Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs.

Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs per gram = epg) (A through C) and corresponding infection probabilities estimated by ... Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs.
Figure 1 Data-selection process

Figure 1 Data-selection process
Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access
Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.

Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.
Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.

Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.
Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.

Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.

Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google