Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLester Parks Modified over 5 years ago
1
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 23rd April 2013
2
ATTENDED BY: Yasmin Carrim – Full-time member Janeen de Klerk – CFO
3
TRIBUNAL MANDATE To promote competition in the economy Have regard to:
Employment Small businesses owned by HDI Impact on a particular sector Ability to compete internationally
4
TRIBUNAL PERFORMANCE Expeditious decision making Transparency Fairness
Efficiency
5
STRATEGIC PLAN No changes to mandate therefore no changes to strategic plan Annual Performance Plan – second year of Strategic Plan Highlight main areas in this presentation
6
ORGANISATIONAL ENVIRONMENT
Tribunal members The Tribunal as at January 2013 consisted of members appointed by the President of South Africa
7
NEW MEMBERS Ms Mondo Mazwai – Lawyer Mr Imraan Valodia – Economist
Mr Anton Roskam- Lawyer
8
EXISTING MEMBERS Mr. Norman Manoim – Lawyer (Chair)
Ms. Yasmin Carrim – Lawyer Mr. Andreas Wessels – Economist Ms. Andiswa Ndoni - Lawyer Dr. Takalani Madima – Lawyer Prof. Merle Holden – Economist Ms. Medi Mokuena – Lawyer Mr. Lawrence Reyburn - Lawyer
9
TERM OF OFFICE Terms of 7 members including Chair will expire in July 2014 We will be engaging with the Ministry to ensure that the functioning of the CT is not unduly affected by delays
10
ECONOMIST Economist appointed in January 2013
11
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE - GAP ANALYSIS
Determine right structure to: To promote the efficiency and achievement of the Tribunal’s strategic objectives Ensure the appropriate skills and capacity in the 3 divisions
12
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE GAP ANALYSIS
3 phases: Gap analysis Job profiling and grading Benchmarking exercise
13
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE - GAP ANALYSIS
To be finalised by end June 2013
14
AMENDMENTS TO LEGISLATION
Will the amendments affect us?
15
AMENDMENTS TO THE LEGISLATION
Only if more matters are referred to us by the Commission as a result of its enquiry
16
ENHANCING ORGANISATIONAL EFFICENCY
Case management system
17
ENHANCING ORGANISATIONAL EFFICIENCY
CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Electronic document management system that facilitates the tracking of all cases and yield performance information Officially launched in February 2013
18
ENHANCING ORGANISATIONAL EFFICENCY
Customer Survey
19
ENHANCING ORGANISATIONAL EFFICIENCY
CUSTOMER SURVEY Aim is to understand stakeholder needs and improve Tribunal performance; Appointed Plus94 to do in-depth interviews and telephonic surveys; Project completion date is 20 May 2013
20
ENHANCING ORGANISATIONAL EFFICIENCY
CUSTOMER SURVEY Assessing: judicial process the conduct of hearings decision making and issuing document management human resources external communication
21
TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
Internships – continue to focus on : Partnership with University of Pretoria for case management internship Internship under Senior Economist (University of Johannesburg and Witwatersrand) Internships in Corporate Services (Technikons and Universities – Johannesburg, Pretoria, Cape Town)
22
CHALLENGES Office space On-going development of CMS – Phase 2
Implementation of gap analysis recommendations
23
OUR EFFICENCY DETERMINES OUR PERFORMANCE
24
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Strategic Focus Area 1: TRIBUNAL HEARINGS AND DECISIONS Goal Statement: Hold hearings and adjudicating matters brought before the Tribunal. Strategic Outcome: Promote and maintain competition within South Africa through the implementation of the Competition Act. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE OUTPUT TARGETS 2013/14 To promote and maintain competition within South Africa by holding hearings and adjudicating matters brought before the Tribunal that pertain to large and intermediate mergers, interim relief cases, procedural matters, opposed as well as unopposed prohibited practices within the adopted delivery timeframes. Large Mergers and reconsidered mergers: Orders 98% of orders issued within 10 business days of the last hearing date Reasons for decision documents 56% of "reason for decisions" issued within 20 business days of order being issued Opposed Prohibited Practices: Order and reasons for decision documents 80% of orders and reasons for decisions issued within 60 business days of the hearing date
25
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS-CONT
Strategic Focus Area 2: STAKEHOLDER AWARENESS Goal Statement: Communicate the activities and decisions of the Competition Tribunal effectively. Strategic Outcome: Educate and create awareness of Competition Matters to the Tribunal's stakeholders. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE OUTPUT TARGETS 2013/14 To educate and to create awareness of competition matters to our stakeholders by communicating the activities and decisions of the Competition Tribunal by way of the internet, press releases, the Government Gazette as well as internal publications within the adopted delivery timeframes. "Reasons for Decision" documents 97% of reasons for decisions posted on the Tribunal website within 24 hours of release Tribunal Tribunes produced Three Tribunal Tribunes distributed to 50 stakeholders by 31 March 2014
26
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS- CONT
Strategic Focus Area 3 OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Goal Statement: Enhance the expertise of Tribunal staff. Improve the service of the Tribunal to our customers. Strategic Outcome: Strengthen the Tribunal's organisational capability and performance to deliver on its legislative mandate STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE OUTPUT TARGETS 2013/14 To enhance the expertise of Tribunal members and staff by sending them on planned International as well as local conferences and training courses. Training feedback form Tribunal members and research staff attend 75% of the budgeted international and national conferences/workshops/training courses by 31 March 2014
27
FINANCES
28
We aim to pay within 30 days
NB because most of our suppliers are small 2 payment cycles per month
29
Aim to continue to get an unqualified audit
30
Total budget for 2013/2014 – R m
31
Income by category Total R 33 083 689 100 % Category Budget %
FILING FEES 29.55 EDD Grant 51.22 BAL BFWD 17.42 INTEREST RECEIVED 1.81 Total R 100 %
32
WHAT DOES IT COST US TO ACHIEVE OUR OBJECTIVES?
33
Budget by objectives Total R 33 083 689 100 % Category Budget %
Strategic Focus 1 – Tribunal hearings and decisions R 55.30 Strategic Focus 2 – Stakeholder awareness R 1.94 Strategic Focus 3 – Operational Efficiency R 4.41 Competition Appeal Court R 2.06 Facilities R 5.55 Capital R 1.51 Support Services R 29.23 Total R 100 %
34
Total Expenditure by category
Expenditure Category % Personnel 61.70 Administration 6.17 Training 4.70 Professional Services 18.31 Appeal Court 2.06 Capital 7.06 Total 100
35
5 YEAR BUDGET (2013/ /2018) Current year budget INCOME EDD GRANT REQUIRED COMMITTED EDD GRANT FEES RECEIVED BAL BFWD INTEREST RECEIVED TOTAL INCOME
36
5 YEAR BUDGET (2013/2014 - 2017/2018) Cont;
Current year budget EXPENDITURE PERSONNEL TRAINING PROF SERVICES RECRUIT COSTS 83 307 87 389 91 409 95 613 ADMIN EXPENSES FACIL AND CAPITAL TOTAL
37
5 YEAR BUDGET (2013/2014 - 2017/2018) Cont APPEALS COURT BUDGET
Current year budget APPEALS COURT BUDGET GRAND TOTAL ANTICIPATED SURPLUS/ (DEFICIT) The budget is calculated by taking the 2013/2014 budget and inflating as follows: Goods and services inflated by 1.049% in 2014/2015 and then by 1.046% for all subsequent years Personnel by 1.059% in 2013/2014 and then by 1.056% for all subsequent years The budget is based on an estimate of fees due given by the CC for 2012/2013 to 2014/2015 and then 5% for the 2 years thereafter The budget provides for the purchase of a new motor vehicle in 2015/2016 At the end of the 2012/2013 year the Tribunal had surpluses of approx R 26 m these are drawn down over the remaining period of the MTEF
38
THANK YOU
39
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.