Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlexandra Borge Modified over 5 years ago
1
Long Term Clinical Results from the Endeavor Program: 5-Year Follow up
David E. Kandzari, Martin B. Leon, William Wijns, Ian T. Meredith, Jean Fajadet, Donald E. Cutlip, Laura Mauri, on Behalf of the Endeavor Program Investigators
2
Endeavor Late-Term Clinical Outcomes
Background Emphasis on DES-related outcomes has shifted temporally from early to late occurring events Shorter term (<1 year) angiographic and revascularization outcomes for DES trials have served as a benchmark for DES efficacy Recent evaluations have identified emerging disparities in outcomes between DES, highlighted in late-term follow up Pooled analyses of alternative DES demonstrate continuation of events beyond the primary endpoint Late-term efficacy outcomes with the Endeavor ZES were examined to assess durability and relative differences to BMS
3
Endeavor Pooled Analysis
ENDEAVOR I First in Human 60 months n = 97/100 (97%) ENDEAVOR II Double-blind Randomized Trial 60 months n = 577/598 (96%) ENDEAVOR II CA Registry Continued Access Registry 60 months n = 287/296 (97%) ENDEAVOR III Confirmatory Trial vs. Cypher 60 months n = 307/323 (95%) ENDEAVOR IV Confirmatory Trial vs. Taxus 36 months n = 734/773 (95%) ENDEAVOR PK Pharmacokinetic Trial 36 months n = 42/43 (98%) 720 days follow up N = 2088 1080 days follow up N = 2063 1440 day follow up N = 1278 1800 day follow up N = 1268
4
Endeavor Pooled Analysis
Baseline Characteristics Endeavor (n = 2132) Driver (n = 596) P Value Age – years (mean ±SD) 62.5 ± 10.7 61.9 ± 10.5 0.230 Males (%) 71.5 75.3 0.060 Diabetics (%) 26.1 22.2 0.054 Unstable Angina (%) 40.8 33.3 0.002 RVD (mm) 2.73 2.76 0.128 Lesion length (mm) 14.16 14.38 0.446 B2/C lesions (%) 71.4 79.0 <0.001
5
Endeavor Safety Analysis
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Patients On DAPT At: 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years ENDEAVOR (Pooled) 38.8 (790/2036) 31.0 (617/1990) 23.7 (457/1931) 7.9 (95/1197) 7.5 (88/1173) Driver 29.0 (166/572) 13.5 (76/562) 9.1 (50/548) 9.2 (50/546) 8.6 (46/534) Data presented as percentages.
6
Endeavor Safety Analysis
Cumulative Incidence of ARC Def/Prob Stent Thrombosis to 5 Years 5% Driver Endeavor £ 1 year Endeavor ST = 0.62% > 1 year Endeavor ST = 0.18% Log rank P = 0.051 4% 3% Cumulative Incidence of Def/Prob Thrombosis 2% 1.7% 1% 0.8% 0% 360 720 1080 1440 1800 Time after Initial Procedure (days) Days 360 720 1080 1440 1800 Endeavor 2132 2131 2044 1989 1687 1199 Events n (%) 1 (0.1) 13 (0.6) 15 (0.7) 16 (0.8) Driver 596 595 570 559 543 538 1 (0.2) 8 (1.4) 9 (1.5) 10 (1.7) By intention to treat (ITT), 2 Endeavor patients had ST at day 354 and day 1349; and 1 Driver patient had an ST at day 842, secondary to TLR. Per the ARC definition, these uncensored events are included in the primary ITT analysis despite the fact that the events may not be related to the study devices.
7
Endeavor Safety Analysis
Cumulative Incidence of Cardiac Death and MI to 5 Years 15% £ 1 year Endeavor Cardiac Death MI = 2.8% > 1 year Endeavor Cardiac Death MI = 2.4% Endeavor Log rank P = 0.003 Driver 10% 8.4% Cumulative Incidence of Cardiac Death or MI 5.2% 5% 0% 360 720 1080 1440 1800 Time after Initial Procedure (days) Days 360 720 1080 1440 1800 Endeavor 2132 2102 2009 1951 1649 1168 Events n (%) 30 (1.4) 60 (2.8) 72 (3.4) 79 (3.8) 87 (4.4) 96 (5.2) Driver 596 581 555 544 529 523 15 (2.5) 27 (4.5) 34 (5.8) 39 (6.6) 41 (7.0) 49 (8.4)
8
Endeavor Efficacy Analysis
Cumulative Incidence of TLR to 5 Years 25% Driver Endeavor £ 1 year Endeavor TLR = 5.4% > 1 year Endeavor TLR = 1.6% Log rank P < 0.001 20% 16.5% 15% Cumulative Incidence of TLR 10% 7.0% 5% 0% 360 720 1080 1440 1800 Time after Initial Procedure (days) Days 360 720 1080 1440 1800 Endeavor 2132 2130 1908 1842 1552 1100 Events n (%) 2 (0.1) 113 (5.4) 129 (6.2) 139 (6.8) 140 (6.8) 142 (7.0) Driver 596 595 489 474 456 445 1 (0.2) 77 (13.2) 83 (14.2) 86 (14.8) 92 (15.9) 95 (16.5)
9
Endeavor: Long Term Efficacy
Predictors of TLR at 1 Year vs >1 Year To 1 year Odds Ratio P Value History of Hypertension 1.601 0.074 B2/C Lesions 1.566 0.082 Angiographic follow up 2.156 <0.001 From 1 to 3 years Odds Ratio P Value History of Hypertension 2.847 0.050 <1 yr: Multiple logistic regression returned 3 predictors, QCA, Hypertension and B2/C lesions; current analysis only shows QCA significant, in previous version (PCR), all three were significant. >1 yr: Multiple logistic regression returned the Hypertension as predictor only – previous version also showed RVD as predictor but this value is now no longer showing in multiple regression model. The variables in the footnote went into the simple logistic regression Variables used in the model include: RVD (per mm), HTN, prior MI, LAD (vs non-LAD), DM, B2/C vs. A/B1, prior PCI, unstable angina, lesion length (per mm), male vs. female, hyperlipidemia, AMI, prior CABG, age (years), angiographic follow up
10
Endeavor: Long Term Efficacy
Sub Groups: Early and Late TLR Rates TLR Rates All NIDDM IDDM RVD <2.75 Lesion ≥20 mm Angio Non- Angio
11
Endeavor: Long Term Clinical Outcomes
Conclusions Against the background of an excellent safety profile: Treatment with the Endeavor ZES is associated with a stable and durable rate of TLR through 5-year follow up The stability in annualized rates of TLR is consistent across the individual trials and is distinguished from BMS Favorable efficacy outcomes are consistent across subgroups at highest risk for clinical restenosis In the context of clinical trials, predictors of late TLR are distinct from those associated with early (<1 year) events These findings underscore the importance of shifting focus to include late term clinically relevant outcomes for a more complete perspective of DES safety and efficacy
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.