Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBulut Öz Modified over 5 years ago
1
Overview of Student Assessment and its Guidelines in the College
Nadia Al Wardy Chairperson, College Examinations Committee Assessment orientation 5/2/2019
2
Standards of “Sound Assessment”
Continuous assessment Evidence of linkage to course objectives Diversity of assessment methods Assess different levels of achievement Criterion referenced Marking accurate and consistent Feedback meaningful and helpful Should enhance student learning Students’ awareness of criteria Proportional to the workload of the course
5
The assessment process
Specifying the purpose Determining what is to be measured and how Measuring it Setting standards of expected performance Reporting results Making a judgement
6
Specifying the Purpose
Formative Summative Diagnosis Promotion Certification
7
Determining what is to be measured and how
Blueprinting A matrix of: What to assess? knowledge, skills, attitudes How to assess? Different assessment tools MCQ EMI MEQ SAQ OSPE/OSCE Mini-CEX CbD OLC ….
8
Guidelines Vetting: For all exams, questions / stations / cases etc. should be reviewed and emended by the relevant committees before the examination takes place Relevance (Scenarios) Types (at least 2 different modalities)
9
IDEAL Office International assessment bank
Over questions available
10
Formats of assessment in Phases I, II and III
Domain/Outcome Phase I Phase II Phase III Clinical Skills OSCE Mini-CEX, CbD, OLC, OSCE, Seminars, WRP, BSP, SC, OSPE Health Promotion & Disease Prevention MCQ, Reports Seminars, OSCE, OLC, CbD Communication Skills TBL Present Seminars, OSCE, OLC, CbD, MCEX Medical Informatics CBA MCQ, CBA MCQ, CBW Basic, Social & Clinical Sciences MCQ, Spotter Lab rep, SAQ MCQ, SAQ, CBP Quiz, problems, Spotter, EMI, OBE, OSPE, MEQ, Viva MCQ, EMI, MEQ, KFQ, SAQ Attitudes, Ethics & Legal Responsibility Assignment, Project, Proposal, Thesis, SAQ MCQ, Mini-CEX, CbD, OLC Personal & Professional Development TBL, OBE Assignment, Project Poster, Thesis, TBL, Present Portfolio Miller’s Pyramid Knows Knows How Shows How Does
11
Principles of assessment (Reliability)
Sampling No. of assessments (min of 3 components) No. and quality of questions (at least 30 MCQs or equivalent/credit hour) No. and quality of examiners Weighting of components (no single component to exceed 60% of total marks) Time per question ( min/MCQ)
12
Example of assessment in courses of Phase I, II, and BMS
Course/Module No. of credits No. of components Weighting Format Intro to Anatomy 4 20%, 20%, 20%, 40% MCQ, Spotter, online Locomotor system 3 30%,10%, 60% MCQ, OSPE Integrated Modules 30%, 20%, 50% MEQ, OSCE Molecular Diagnostics 20%, 20%, 60% MCQ, practical
13
Assessment in Phase III
Stage Block Continuous (50%) Final (50%) Stage I Pre-Clerkship 3 Mini-CEX MCQ and EMI Junior Clerkship: Med/CH & allied block Surg & allied block BM/Fam block Mini-CEX, OLC, KFQs (40%) Portfolio (seminars, ward round presentations, bedside procedures, case write-ups) (10%) 80 MCQ & EMI, 20 SAQ (30%) 8 OSCE (20%) Stage II Senior Clerkship: Med/Famco & allied block, Surg & allied block, Women & Child block Mini-CEX, OLC, (CbD), KFQs (40%) Seminars, Ward round presentations, Bedside Procedures, Case write-ups (10%) 60 MCQ & EMI, 4 OSCE (20%) Elective Selective Pre-Internship FMD 120 MCQ (20%) 120 SAQ (20%) 15 OSCE (20%) 8 Short Cases (40%)
14
Stage 1 3 block exams Stage 2 3 block exams MED/CH SURG BM/Fam MED/Fam
Women & Child
15
Junior Clerkship A B C D E F Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Med x CH Surgery
Ophthal BM FAMCO 2 3 Mini-CEX 4 OLC Orthopedics 5 6 Dermatol 7 Genetics Anesthesia Mini CEX SAQ KFQ 8 Lab EBM MEQ Forensic MCQ Geriatric Oral Health
16
Marking MCQ and EMI: MEQ, SAQ and Essays:
if not done on-line, then optical marking. MEQ, SAQ and Essays: model answers double marking is encouraged OSCE/OSPE, Mini-CEX, OLC, Presentations, Reports… checklists and rating scales several examiners should be available, but one examiner should mark the same question for all students for consistency.
17
Standard setting method Fixed percentages (eg 60%)
Angoff Hofstee Borderline group Fixed percentages (eg 60%) For all the absolute methods here we first have to define the borderline group of students. Those students who have a 50% chance of passing. Discuss Or a group that is minimally competent Take first item judge difficulty and importance of the item. Estimate the percentage of borderline candidates that that will respond correctly ie get it right. Fix your estimate Proceed to next item Take each estimate and average across the examination to obtain the cut point
18
Grade descriptions Grade Description A
Exceptional performance; all course objectives achieved; objectives met in a consistently outstanding manner. B Very good performance; significantly more than the majority of the course objectives achieved (majority being at least two-thirds); objectives met in a consistently thorough manner. C Satisfactory performance: at least the majority of course objectives achieved; objectives met satisfactorily. D Minimally acceptable performance: less than the majority but more than the minimum required course objectives achieved; objectives met at a minimally acceptable level. F Unacceptable performance: minimum required course objectives not met; objectives not met at a minimally acceptable level; no credit earned. FW Failure to meet the attendance requirement, no credits earned FSP Failure with Supplemental Privilege
19
Programme for conversion of scores to grades
20
Item analysis and test statistics
IDEAL Office Determination of difficulty, discrimination and reliability indices Results of these analyses should be discussed by the relevant committees to assist in making informed decisions
21
Reporting results What? To whom?
Grade sheets filled online to be submitted to the Examination Office before and after confirmation of grades (timeline) Separate spreadsheet showing scores of all ICAs and final accompanied by course report form Grade report form To whom? Examinations Committee through Examinations Office
22
Feedback ICAs: Finals not discussed within 1 week timetabled
should not involve release of questions but a discussion of points of weaknesses Finals not discussed
23
Management College Board College Examinations Committee
Phase II Exam Subcommittee Phase III Exam Subcommittee Written group OSCE group SC group IP and BMS Exam Subcommittee
24
Management College Board College Examinations Committee
Phase II Exam Subcommittee Phase III Exam Subcommittee Written group OSCE group SC group IP and BMS Exam Subcommittee Chairman Chairman (CC) Assistant Deans (Pre-clinical and Clinical) Phase Coordinators Senior staff members Examinations Officer
25
Management College Board College Examinations Committee
Phase II Exam Subcommittee Phase III Exam Subcommittee Written group OSCE group SC group IP and BMS Exam Subcommittee PC, JC and SC Block coordinators Chairs/Reps Dept Exam Committees Course/module coordinators
26
Examinations Office Examination timetables
Examination booklets, optical mark sheets, etc Administrative forms related to examinations Copy, store (electronically), and ensure security of all examination question papers Assignment of invigilators Prepare, print, and distribute information relating to assessments Coordinating the visit of External Examiners Collection of grades Liaising with A&R in matters related to assessment …..
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.