1. City Managers Meeting October 11, 2018
New Agency Proposal for San Mateo County
City Managers Meeting October 11, 2018
August 2, 2018

3. City Information Gathering Meetings
August 30th: 10 attendees from the following cities:
September 10th: 17 attendees from the following cities:
September 18th: 27 attendees from the following cities:
Atherton
Menlo Park
Redwood City
San Carlos
Brisbane
Colma
Daly City
Hillsborough
Portola Valley
San Bruno
South San Francisco
Woodside
What level of involvement does the SAT want in these meetings? Transparency, not aligned on a new agency. vs extending
Belmont
Burlingame
Foster City
Half Moon Bay
Pacifica
Millbrae
San Mateo
See handout for City’s responses to questions

4. New Agency Proposal Framework
“Strategic Plan” Level Document that Includes:
Mission Statement: Concentrates on the Present
Vision Statement: Focuses on the Future
Goals: Outcome Statements to Guide Implementation
Priority Objectives: How the goals accomplished
Developed in response to Water Agency: New Agency, or Expansion. New agency will do these goals, but the Cities will need to visualize what the agency is going to do

5. Developed graphic in response to the Water Committee.
Recommendation
Developed graphic in response to the Water Committee.

6. Governance Options Review Criteria
Ease of Establishment
Ability to Leverage State and Federal Funding
Legal Authority
Ability to Contract, Own Property
Financing
Tax or Revenue Stream
Decision Making/Governance
Ability to Expand/Adapt

7. Governance Options
Baseline: Existing San Mateo County Flood Resilience Program. Sunsets June 2019.
Governance Options
Option 1: Department in San Mateo County
Option 2: Modify Existing C/CAG JPA
Option 3: Creation of New JPA
Option 4: Modify Existing Special District: SMC Flood
Option 5: Create New Special District

8. Supposal: Background and Discussion
Bottoms up Approach: Existing and future Building Block Projects
Funding:
Acknowledges County funding expires June 30, 2019
Addresses beneficiary pays
Anticipate 50% funding from County first 3 years
Limits size of agency core services with subscription costs to moderate City’s investment
Decision Making
Uses MOUs for Building Block Projects as decision making vehicle
Transfers governance from Board of Supervisors to local agencies/retains control with MOUs at local level
Ease of Establishment
Leverages existing agency to initiate quickly
Expands flexibility of services and participation

10. Next Steps Outreach Letter to Forward to Council Members
Handout and Electronic Version to Follow
Continue to refine New Agency Proposal
2nd Round of City Outreach to Review New Agency Proposal
November 14th and December 3rd
C/CAG Water Committee and Board of Directors Review
Board of Supervisors Review