1. TGad March 2010 Report Date: 2010-03-15 Authors: March 2010 April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
TGad March 2010 Report
Date:
Authors:
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

2. March 2010
Meeting Protocol
Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot
Slide 2
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

3. Register Indicate attendance Attendance
March 2010
Attendance
Register
Indicate attendance
See document r0 for more details
Slide 3
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

4. Attendance, Voting & Document Status
March 2010
Attendance, Voting & Document Status
Make sure your badges are correct
If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising
Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, member’s area
see Adrian Stephens –
Cell Phones Silent or Off
Slide 4
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

5. Patent Policy Following 5 slides March 2010 April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Patent Policy
Following 5 slides
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

6. Instructions for the WG Chair
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Instructions for the WG Chair
The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee:
Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation
Advise the WG attendees that:
The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws;
Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged;
There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development.
Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting:
That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown;
That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard
Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom.
The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance.
It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual and in FAQs 12 and 12a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference.
Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board.
(Optional to be shown)
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

7. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants:
“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents
“Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims
“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)
The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group
Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2
Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged
No duty to perform a patent search
Slide #1
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

8. Patent Related Links Patent Policy is stated in these sources:
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Patent Related Links
All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development.
Patent Policy is stated in these sources:
IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws
IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual
Material about the patent policy is available at
If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit
This slide set is available at
Slide #2
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

9. Call for Potentially Essential Patents
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Call for Potentially Essential Patents
If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance:
Either speak up now or
Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or
Cause an LOA to be submitted
Slide #3
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

10. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.
Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.
Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.
Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.
Technical considerations remain primary focus
Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets.
Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.
Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object.
See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.
Slide #4
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

11. Agenda Items for the Week
March 2010
Agenda Items for the Week
Call for secretary
Review from January
Review conference calls
Approve minutes from January
Review list of New Technique proposals and strawpolls
Continue developing task group documents
Channel modeling
Evaluation methodology
Selection Procedure
Motions of drafts of task group documents
New Technique Proposals
Strawpolls
Planning for proposal presentations in May
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

12. Submissions Evaluation Methodology Channel Modeling
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Submissions
Evaluation Methodology
Channel Modeling
ad-Tgad-channel-model-update.ppt, Alexander (Wed PM2)
10/0372r0, "Intra-cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise cubicle environments at 60GHz”, Sawada (Wed PM2)
Selection procedure
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

13. Tentative TGad Agenda for the Week
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Tentative TGad Agenda for the Week
Monday Mar 15th, 13:30 – 15:30
Call for secretary
Review from January
Review conference calls
Approve minutes from January
Review list of New Technique proposals and strawpolls
Continue developing task group documents
Channel modeling
Evaluation methodology
Selection Procedure
Tuesday Mar 16th, 16:00 – 18:00
New Technique Proposals 1, 2, 3
Wednesday Mar 17th, 13:30 – 15:30
New Technique Proposals 4, 6
Wednesday Mar 17th, 16:00 – 18:00
Call for secretary
New Technique Proposals 7, 8
Continue developing task group documents
Channel modeling
Evaluation methodology
Selection Procedure
Motions of drafts of task group documents
Thursday Mar 18th, 8:00 – 10:00
Special orders of the day of New Technique strawpolls at 8:10
Thursday Mar 18th, 13:30 – 15:30
Planning for proposal presentations in May
Goals for May
Conference calls
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

14. Monday Mar 15th, 13:30 – 15:30 Call for secretary Review from January
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Monday Mar 15th, 13:30 – 15:30
Call for secretary
Review from January
Review conference calls
Approve minutes from January
Review list of New Technique proposals and strawpolls
Continue developing task group documents
Channel modeling
Evaluation methodology
Selection Procedure
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

15. Review from January (1/2)
March 2010
Review from January (1/2)
Reviewed Notifications of Intent for proposals
38 new techniques proposals (30 min each)
12 to be presented in March
26 to be presented in May
4 complete proposals to be presented in May (60 min each)
Evaluation Methodology
10/0067r0, TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations, Minyoung Park
09/1160r3, Update on coexistence evaluation methodology, John Barr
10/0046r1, Proposed Addition to Evaluation Methodology, Avinash Jain
09/0296r16, Update to evaluation methodology document, Eldad Perahia
10/0149r0, Proposed Evaluation Methodology Addition, Shu Kato
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

16. Review from January (2/2)
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Review from January (2/2)
Channel Modeling
10/0090r0, Modeling the Dynamical Human Blockage for 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models, Martin Jacob (presented by Alexander Maltsev)
10/0133r0, TGad Channel model update, Alexander Maltsev
10/0112r1, Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel modeling at 60 GHz (Part 3), Hirokazu Sawada
09/0334r6, Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, Alexander Maltsev
Selection procedure
09/935r5, selection procedure, Matt Fischer
Other technical contributions
10/0027r0, 60 GHz in-cabin channel, Alexis Paolo Garcia Ariza
All task group document motions passed! 
Motion to adopt 09/0935r5 as the first draft of TGad selection procedure document passed 64/1/0
Motion to adopt 09/0334r6 as the first draft of TGad channel model document passed 67/1/0
Motion to adopt 09/0296r16 as the first draft of TGad evaluation methodology document passed 65/1/0
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

17. March 2010
January Minutes
Motion to approve January ‘10 TGad minutes as contained in r1
Move: John Barr
Second: Vinko Erceg
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

18. Review of Conference Calls
March 2010
Review of Conference Calls
Cumulative minutes from 2010 in 10/0013r1
Feb 25, :00 ET
11-10/0242r0, SCR Synchronization, John Stine
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

19. New Technique Proposals (in order of presentation)
March 2010
New Technique Proposals (in order of presentation)
802.11ad New Technique Proposal, 10/0259r1, Yuichi Morioka, Sony
Synchronous Collision Resolution - A New Technology Proposal, 10/0255r1, John Stine, Self
Channel Estimation Sequence for TGad, 10/0264r3, André Bourdoux, IMEC
Spatial Discovery in 60 GHz, 10/0245r1, Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital
Simultaneous Beam Training, 10/0252r0, Hossein Taghavi, Qualcomm (withdrawn)
Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems, 10/0231r2, John Barr, NICT
Basic TGad MAC Layer Proposals and Options for Coexistence, 10/0249r2, Xiaoming Peng, Insititute for Infocomm Research
Spatial Reuse Strategies in 60 GHz, 10/0250r1, Ananth Subramanian, Insititute for Infocomm Research
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

20. Presentations for Mon, March 15th, 13:30 – 15:30
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Presentations for Mon, March 15th, 13:30 – 15:30
none
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

21. Notes for Mon, March 15th, 13:30 – 15:30
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Notes for Mon, March 15th, 13:30 – 15:30
Agenda approved
Jan minutes approved
Channel model update on Wed PM1
Qualcomm New Technique presentation withdrawn
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

22. NT Proposal Presentations for Tuesday, March 16th, 16:00 – 18:00
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
NT Proposal Presentations for Tuesday, March 16th, 16:00 – 18:00
802.11ad New Technique Proposal, 10/0259r2, Yuichi Morioka, Sony
Synchronous Collision Resolution - A New Technology Proposal, 10/0255r2, John Stine, Self
Channel Estimation Sequence for TGad, 10/0264r3, André Bourdoux, IMEC
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

23. Notes for Tuesday, March 16th, 16:00 – 18:00
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Notes for Tuesday, March 16th, 16:00 – 18:00
Strawpolls for 10/255r2
Do you have sufficient information to understand the features of the technique - Synchronous Collision Resolution MAC as described in 10/0255r2?
Y: 19, N: 1, A: 32
Do you have sufficient information on the claims made about the performance of the technique - Synchronous Collision Resolution MAC as described in 10/0255r2?
Y: 8, N: 17, A: 15
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

24. NT Proposal Presentations for Wednesday, March 17th, 13:30 – 15:30
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
NT Proposal Presentations for Wednesday, March 17th, 13:30 – 15:30
Spatial Discovery in 60 GHz, 10/0245r1, Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital
Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems, 10/0231r2, John Barr, NICT
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

25. Agenda for Wednesday, March 17th, 16:00 – 18:00
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Agenda for Wednesday, March 17th, 16:00 – 18:00
NT Proposal presentations
Basic TGad MAC Layer Proposals and Options for Coexistence, 10/0249r2, Xiaoming Peng, Insititute for Infocomm Research
Spatial Reuse Strategies in 60 GHz, 10/0250r1, Ananth Subramanian, Insititute for Infocomm Research
Channel modeling
10/0372r0, "Intra-cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise cubicle environments at 60GHz”, Sawada
ad-Tgad-channel-model-update.ppt, Alexander
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

26. Notes for Wednesday, March 17th, 16:00 – 18:00
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Notes for Wednesday, March 17th, 16:00 – 18:00
Channel modeling
Vish requested to review whether two cubicle intra-cluster models are necessary
Kato requested to review wall attenuation factor used in ray tracing to generate cubicle pathloss model
Alexander to rerun ray tracing with double bounce for cubicle
No strawpolls by Yuichi for Th
Sudheer withdrew his strawpoll for Th
Agenda for Th AM1
Strawpolls at 8:10
No motion on channel model
Try to complete Th PM1 agenda items so we can finish early
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

27. Agenda for Thursday, March 18th, 8:00 – 10:00
NT Strawpolls
Planning for proposal presentations in May
Goals for May
Conference calls
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

28. Strawpoll - John Stine, Self
March 2010
Strawpoll - John Stine, Self
Do you support the inclusion of the technique,
-Synchronous Collision Resolution MAC
as described in 10/0255r2 in the TGad draft amendment?
Yes: 1 No: 43 Abs: 34
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

29. Strawpoll - André Bourdoux, IMEC
March 2010
Strawpoll - André Bourdoux, IMEC
Do you support inclusion of the technique,
-Golay complementary pair with maximum length zero-correlation zone for the estimation of the channel response and IQ imbalance
as described in 10/0264r3 in the TGad draft amendment?
Yes: 8 No: 44 Abs: 33
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

30. Strawpolls - John Barr, NICT (1/3)
March 2010
Strawpolls - John Barr, NICT (1/3)
Do you support inclusion of the technique,
-pre-BSS establishment channel scanning for 60GHz BSS
as described in 10/0231r3 in the TGad draft amendment?
Yes: 23 No: 52 Abs: 12
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

31. Strawpolls - John Barr, NICT (2/3)
March 2010
Strawpolls - John Barr, NICT (2/3)
Do you support inclusion of the technique,
-CMS sync frame transmission for 60GHz APs
as described in 10/0231r3 in the TGad draft amendment?
Yes: 13 No: 54 Abs: 19
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

32. Strawpolls - John Barr, NICT (3/3)
March 2010
Strawpolls - John Barr, NICT (3/3)
Do you support inclusion of the technique,
-CMS sync frame transmission for IBSS STAs
as described in 10/0231r3 in the TGad draft amendment?
Yes: 13 No: 58 Abs: 19
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

33. Strawpoll - Xiaoming Peng, Insititute for Infocomm Research
March 2010
Strawpoll - Xiaoming Peng, Insititute for Infocomm Research
Do you support inclusion of the technique,     - Options for coexistence as described in 10/0249r2 in the TGad draft amendment?
Yes: 9 No: 58 Abs: 21
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

34. March 2010
Strawpolls - Ananth Subramanian, Insititute for Infocomm Research (1/3)
Do you support inclusion of the technique,     - Device discovery strategies with the aid of Topology IEs as described in 10/0250r1 in the TGad draft amendment?
Yes: 8 No: 58 Abs: 19
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

35. March 2010
Strawpolls - Ananth Subramanian, Insititute for Infocomm Research (2/3)
Do you support inclusion of the technique,     - Spatial reuse strategies for stationary networks as described in 10/0250r1 in the TGad draft amendment?
Yes: 8 No: 57 Abs: 20
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

36. March 2010
Strawpolls - Ananth Subramanian, Insititute for Infocomm Research (3/3)
Do you support inclusion of the technique,     - Spatial reuse strategies for networks with low mobility as described in 10/0250r1 in the TGad draft amendment?
Yes: 8 No: 55 Abs: 22
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

37. Planning for proposal presentations in May
March 2010
Planning for proposal presentations in May
27 New Techniques proposal requests
3 Complete proposal requests
Time requirements
Assumptions:
Exactly 30 minutes allocation for new technique (inclusive of presentation, Q&A)
Exactly 60 minutes allocation for complete (inclusive of presentation, Q&A)
May: 9 meeting time slots
Tentative agenda
New Technique proposals
Random order of on-time notifications
Followed by random order of late notifications, as time permits
Complete proposals
Special order start time (two time slots)
Random order (on-time and late notifications)
Strawpolls
Note: In March, the nine strawpolls took 22 minutes
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

38. March 2010
Strawpoll
If the series of NT proposal presentations refers to a Complete proposal, the proposers may select to present the Complete prior to the NT proposal for May and July only
Y: 51
N: 4
A: 7
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

39. March 2010
Motion
It is the intent of TGad in the May 2010 session to present all three complete proposals, followed by NT proposals presentations. Presentation order of both the complete proposals and NT proposals will be random.
Move: Eric
Seconder: Ali
Y: 48, N: 1, A: 12
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

40. List of proposals for May
March 2010
List of proposals for May
New Techniques
Complete
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

41. Proposal Presentation Protocol
March 2010
Proposal Presentation Protocol
Due to large number of presentations, we will need to be very strict on time keeping
New technique presentations will be restricted to 30 min (inclusive of presentation, Q&A)
Complete proposal presentations will be restricted to 60 min (inclusive of presentation, Q&A)
Start time of Complete proposal presentations will be fixed in agenda by special order
Presenters need to plan for Q&A as part of their time allocation
Additional questions beyond time allocation can be directed to presenter offline in person or by or on conference calls
Strawpoll all proposals at the last TGad time slot of the session
Prior agreement to standard strawpoll template to minimize questions about the strawpoll language to reduce the time
Authors to provide chair with composed strawpoll in advance
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

42. Standard Strawpoll Templates
March 2010
Standard Strawpoll Templates
“Do you support inclusion of the technique,
[list technique]
as described in 10/YYYYrZ in the TGad draft amendment?”
“Do you support adopting the complete proposal in 10/YYYYrZ as the first draft of the TGad amendment?”
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

43. Goals for May Complete Proposal Presentations
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Goals for May
Complete Proposal Presentations
New Technique Proposal Presentations
Complete Channel Model document
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

44. Conference call times Not overlap with TGac April 29 10:00-12:00 EDT
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
March 2010
Conference call times
Not overlap with TGac
April 29
10:00-12:00 EDT
Channel modeling
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation