1. Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 611-622 (May 2006)
Crucial Role of MLL for the Maintenance of Memory T Helper Type 2 Cell Responses 
Masakatsu Yamashita, Kiyoshi Hirahara, Ryo Shinnakasu, Hiroyuki Hosokawa, Satoko Norikane, Motoko Y. Kimura, Akihiro Hasegawa, Toshinori Nakayama 
Immunity 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
DOI: /j.immuni
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
The Ability to Produce Th2 Cytokines in MLL+/− Effector and Memory Th2 Cells
(A) MLL mRNA expression in naive CD4 T, and effector and memory Th1/Th2 cells. The expression levels of MLL and HPRT mRNA were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Relative intensity (mean of three samples) with standard deviation is shown.
(B) Decreased IL-4-producing cells in MLL+/− memory Th2 cells. Intracellular staining profiles of IFNγ and IL-4, after stimulation with PMA (10 ng/ml) plus Ionomycin (500 nM) for 4 hr, are shown with the percentages of cells in each area. Three independent experiments were done with similar results.
(C) Decreased Th2 cytokine production in MLL+/− memory Th2 cells. Effector and memory Th1/Th2 cells were stimulated in vitro with OVA plus APC for the indicated hours, and the concentration of cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IFNγ) in the culture supernatant was determined by ELISA. The mean values of triplicate cultures with standard deviations are shown. Five independent experiments were performed with similar results.
Immunity  , DOI: ( /j.immuni )
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Acetylation of Histone H3-K9 and Methylation of H3-K4 at the Th2 Cytokine Gene Loci in MLL+/− Effector and Memory Th2 Cells
Effector Th2 cells (A) and memory Th2 cells (B) were generated from MLL+/− mice. A ChIP assay was performed with anti-acetylhistone H3-K9 and anti-dimethylhistone H3-K4 antibodies and indicated specific primer pairs. Three regulatory elements (CGRE, 1.6 Kb upstream of IL-13 exon1 [Yamashita et al., 2002]; CNS1, intergenic region between IL-13 and IL-4 [Loots et al., 2000]; and VA enhancer region, downstream of IL-4 gene [Agarwal et al., 2000]) were included.
(A and B) PCR was performed with a 3-fold serial dilution of template genomic DNA. Three independent experiments in each panel were performed with similar results. The relative band intensities (/input) are shown.
(C) The levels of histone H3-K4 methylation were determined by quantitative PCR. The relative intensity (/input) (mean of three samples) is shown with standard deviations.
(D) A representative result of a ChIP analysis with a series of primer pairs covering the IL-4/IL-13 gene loci. Shown is the relative intensity (/input) of each primer pair. The PCR product bands are shown in Figure S3. Three independent experiments in each panel were performed with similar results.
Immunity  , DOI: ( /j.immuni )
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
MLL+/− Effector Th2 Cells Fail to Maintain Th2 Cytokine Production and Histone H3-K4 Methylation In Vitro
(A) Decreased IL-4-production in MLL+/− effector Th2 cells maintained under resting culture conditions in vitro. Three independent experiments were done with similar results.
(B) MLL+/− Th2 cells maintained under resting culture conditions were stimulated with immobilized anti-TCR mAb for 16 hr, and the production of indicated cytokines was determined by ELISA. The mean values of triplicate cultures with standard deviations are shown. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results.
(C) The levels of histone H3-K4 methylation at Th2 cytokine gene loci in MLL+/+ and MLL+/− Th2 cells maintained under resting culture conditions were determined by a ChIP assay with a quantitative PCR analysis as described in Figure 2C. The relative intensity (/input) (mean of three samples) is shown with standard deviations.
(D) The protein expression of GATA3, c-Maf, JunB, NFAT1, and NFAT2 in MLL+/− Th2 cells maintained under resting culture conditions. Immunoblotting with specific mAbs was performed. Band intensities were measured with a densitometer, and arbitrary densitometric units are shown.
Immunity  , DOI: ( /j.immuni )
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4
GATA3 Expression and Histone Modifications at the GATA3 Gene Locus in MLL+/− Memory Th2 Cells
(A) Decreased mRNA expression of GATA3 in MLL+/− memory Th2 cells. mRNA levels of GATA3, NFAT1, NFAT2, JunB, c-Maf, p300, CBP, Meis, and HPRT were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The relative intensity (/HPRT) (mean of three samples) is shown with standard deviations. N.D., not detected.
(B) The acetylation of histone H3-K9 and methylation of histone H3-K4 at the GATA3 promoter and GATA3 intron1 region of the GATA3 gene locus in MLL+/− memory Th2 cells.
(C) A representative result of a ChIP analysis with a series of primer pairs covering the GATA3 locus. Shown is the relative intensity (/input) of each primer pair. The PCR product bands are shown in Figure S6. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results.
(D) The levels of methylation of histone H3-K4 at several regions around the GATA3 gene locus in MLL+/− memory Th2 cells was determined by a ChIP assay with a quantitative PCR analysis as described in Figure 2C. The regions examined are GATA3-CNS1 (location: approximately primer #2 site in [C]), GATA3 promoter (GATA3p, location: approximately primer #4 site in [C]), GATA3 exon2 (location: approximately primer #7 site in [C]), and GATA3 intron2 (location: approximately primer #8 site in [C]). The relative intensity (/input) (mean of three samples) is shown with standard deviations. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results.
Immunity  , DOI: ( /j.immuni )
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

6. Figure 5
mRNA Expression and Histone Modification of the GATA3 Gene Locus and the Th2 Cytokine Gene Loci in MLL-Knockdown Th2 Cell Lines
(A) mRNA expression of MLL and GATA3 in MLL-knockdown (KD) Th2 cell lines (MLL KD #1, #2, and #3). mRNA levels of MLL, GATA3, and HPRT were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The relative intensity (/HPRT) (mean of three samples) is shown with standard deviations. Total, D10G4.1 cells without selection.
(B) mRNA levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and HPRT in MLL KD #1 cells after PMA+Ionomycin stimulation (24 hr) were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Relative intensity (/HPRT) (mean of three samples) is shown with standard deviations.
(C) Histone modifications within the GATA3 gene locus in MLL KD #1 cells. ChIP assay was performed with anti-acetylhistone H3-K9 and anti-dimethylhistone H3-K4 antibodies and the indicated specific primer pairs. Shown are the PCR product bands (top) and the relative intensity (/input) for each primer pair (bottom). Two independent experiments were performed with similar results.
(D) Histone modifications at the Th2 cytokine gene loci. PCR was performed with 3-fold serial dilution of template genomic DNA. Two independent experiments were performed with similar results.
Immunity  , DOI: ( /j.immuni )
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

7. Figure 6
Binding of MLL Protein to Specific Regions around the GATA3 Gene Locus and the Th2 Cytokine Gene Loci
(A) A representative view of the results from MLL ChIP-on-chip analysis. The logarithmic ratio (log2 R) of hybridization intensities between MLL ChIP DNA and a control DNA was used. The subtracted ratio values (MLL ChIP – Control Ig ChIP) of each DNA spot (50 nucleotides) in the GATA3 locus (top), the IL-4/IL-13 loci (middle), and IL-5 locus (bottom) are shown. The red bars represent the values over 2. The horizontal bars represent possible MLL binding regions identified by a Signal Map Software. Reported transcripts (blue) are also shown.
(B) Standard ChIP assay with quantitative PCR for MLL. Naive CD4 T cells and memory Th1 and Th2 cells were used. The data for five selected regions (GATA3 promoter, GATA3 exon2, GATA3 intron2, CGRE, and CNS2) are shown. The relative intensity (/input) (mean of three samples) is shown with standard deviations.
(C) Decreased binding of MLL in MLL+/− memory Th2 cells. MLL+/+ and MLL+/− memory Th2 cells were used. The relative intensity (/input) (mean of three samples) is shown with standard deviations.
Immunity  , DOI: ( /j.immuni )
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

8. Figure 7
MLL Regulates the Memory Th2 Cell-Dependent Immune Responses and Inflammation In Vivo
OVA-specific wild-type (MLL+/+) and MLL+/− effector Th2 cells with DO11.10 Tg background were intravenously transferred into BALB/c nu/nu mice. Five weeks after cell transfer, the mice were treated with inhaled OVA 4 times, on days 0, 2, 8, and 10.
(A) The serum concentrations of total (top) and OVA-specific (bottom) antibodies with the indicated isotype before (on day 0) and after (on day 11) OVA inhalation were determined by ELISA. The mean values with standard deviations (five animals per group) are shown. ∗p < 0.01 by Student's t test. The control represents BALB/c nu/nu mice without Th2 cell transfer.
(B) Reduced infiltration of eosinophils in bronchioalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) fluid. Memory Th2 mice were generated and inhaled with OVA as described above. BAL fluid was collected on day 12. The absolute cell number (left) and percentage (right) of eosinophils (Eos.), Neutrophils (Neut.), lymphocytes (Lym.), and macrophages (Mac.) in the BAL fluid are shown with standard deviations. Five mice per group were used. ∗p < 0.01; ∗∗p < 0.05 by Student's t test.
(C and D) On day 11, the lungs were fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (C) or with PAS (D). A representative staining pattern in each group is shown. Magnification, ×400. The number of infiltrated leukocytes in the peribronchiolar region (mean cell numbers/mm2 with standard deviations) are also shown ([C], bottom). The control (Cont.) represents BALB/c nu/nu mice without Th2 cell transfer. ∗p < 0.01.
(E) Reduced infiltration of eosinophils in BAL fluid in MLL+/− mice. MLL+/+ and MLL+/− mice with DO11.10 Tg background (five mice per group) were used. The results were obtained as described in [B]. ∗p < 0.01; ∗∗p < 0.05 by Student's t test.
Immunity  , DOI: ( /j.immuni )
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions