Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Data Teaming for Tier 2 Systems of SW-PBIS

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Data Teaming for Tier 2 Systems of SW-PBIS"— Presentation transcript:

1 Data Teaming for Tier 2 Systems of SW-PBIS
Chris Borgmeier PhD Portland State University

2 On-line SW-PBIS Coaching Certificate Fall Term Beginning in September SW-PBIS: Coaching Tier 2

3 Intensive Individual Interventions: Specialized Individualized
Systems for Students with High-Risk Behaviour CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% ~15% Targeted Group Interventions: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behaviour Universal Interventions: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings – why focus on these student here? (NOT B/C we’re giving up!) 2 reasons – b/c prevention works! AND cut down to reasonable # will this be enough for all students? NO ~80% of Students

4 Supporting Social Competence &
Elements of SW-PBIS Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior SYSTEMS DATA PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior 4

5 Tier 2 Systems Focus on: Efficiency = support several (e.g. small group/targeted) students at one time using few resources limited assessment & individualization school-wide programming Effectiveness = attaining desired student outcomes Using Research-based interventions with FIDELITY Early identification & intervention Progress Monitoring & data-based decision making for individual student & system Scaling = develop a system with capacity to have meaningful impact in school (serve 10% of total school enrollment)

6 Tier 2 System v. an intervention
System = more than an intervention 4 Questions for Implementing a Tier 2 System Are you implementing a continuum of research- based intervention(s) with fidelity? Is there a screening process to ensure early identification of students at-risk? Are you using sensitive progress monitoring tools to inform decision making related to student progress and system efficacy? Are you implementing at a scale that is making a meaningful impact (10 % of student population)?

7 Tier 2 Assessment & Intervention
Intensive Targeted Non-Responder Preliminary FBA Modified CICO Match to Function Progress Monitoring Borderline Initial CICO Data Intervention Assessment “Tweak”/ Small change to CICO Student Referral Data (ODRs) Basic CICO Screening Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems

8 OREGON 2013-14 CICO-SWIS Tier 2

9 CICO-SWIS in Oregon 2013-14 Schools Students Elem 113 2034 MS 37 688
HS 2 28 Pre-8th 7 133 Others 42 TOTAL 161 2925

10

11 79% 86% 71% 72% 90%

12

13

14

15 Additional Resources (book & video) thru Guilford Press & Publications

16 High School Behavior Education Program/ CICO Variation
Download HS-BEP Handbook from Variation of CICO/BEP adapted for High School – focused on Academic Seminar

17 BASIC CYCLE Check In Check Out (CICO) Student Referred for CICO
CICO Plan/ Initial Meeting Teach/Role Play Skills Parent Feedback Regular Teacher Afternoon Check-out Morning Check-in CICO Coordinator Summarizes Data For Decision Making Bi-weekly Progress Monitoring Meeting Revise Program Exit Program

18 Major Features of Targeted Interventions
Intervention is continuously available Rapid access to intervention (72 hr) Very low effort by teachers Consistent with school-wide expectations Implemented by all staff/faculty in a school Flexible intervention based on assessment Functional Assessment Adequate resources (admin, team) weekly meeting, plus 10 hours a week Student chooses to participate Continuous monitoring for decision-making

19 CICO: Implementation Checks
SYSTEM Person assigned with FTE to coordinate & manage daily implementation of CICO Bi-weekly team meetings for student referral/ identification for CICO & progress monitoring Materials & incentives readily available Staff-wide buy-in, commitment & training in roles, responsibilities related to CICO Regular updates to staff on student data & implementation

20 CICO: Implementation Checks
PRACTICES Reliable daily am check-in & pm check-out Students earn rewards for success (daily at first) Not punitive

21 CICO: Implementation Checks
DATA Daily collection of point card data Regular review of graphic student data for decision making (at least every 2 weeks) Regular student referral for early identification of at-risk students

22 Data Collection Focus on Efficiency Generic point card
Expectations linked to School-wide rules Limited individualization We do not want to spend time tailoring the point card at this level of intervention

23 Generic Point Card No time spent individualizing

24 Team Task: 1. Take a few minutes to complete the BEP-FIM as a Self Assessment. 2 = In Place 1 = Partially In Place 0 = Not in Place 2. Identify actions necessary to address areas to improve CICO implementation

25 Teaming Structures & Processes
Screening Decision Rules Progress Monitoring

26 Individual PBIS Efficient Teaming Process Intervention Focused
Clear roles, procedures & responsibilities Intervention Focused Linked to Continuum of Interventions (Tier 1  2  3) Try the easy things first (Tier 2 Interventions) …then Tier 3 (FBA/BSP) Data focused & Early Identification Progress Monitoring Student Identification through Systematic Screening

27 RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) From Tier 2 to Tier 3
Tier I Tier II Tier III Universal SWPBIS Team Progress Monitoring Team FBA Team Monitors effectiveness and fidelity of Tier 2 Interventions (overall and for each student) Plans SW & Class-wide supports Conducts FBA, develops BIP NOT a standing team Trust the System -- Tier 2 Process Maximizing # of minutes/ student Sept. 1, 2009 28 28

28 Student Screening & Identification
Emphasize early identification

29 Universal Screening Before the 1st Day of School
Review Data from last year Your school data And data on incoming students (if available) Identify students who had Behavior Support Plans in place per IEP (or otherwise) Prepare to implement BSP with necessary modifications from beginning of the school year Identify returning students with more than 5 referrals last year who might benefit from behavioral support to begin the year

30 Previous Years Discipline data
Who needs to be on our radar from Day 1? Who had FBA/BSP’s last year? Which students moved on? Which are returning this year? Can we get data for our incoming class & new students? Decision Rule

31 Continuing Screening through the Year
I-PBS team reviews student referral data every 2 weeks at each meeting Many referrals might also go directly to the CICO manager Develop Decision Rules for continuing Student Identification through the year Example: Students receiving 3rd referral or 2nd in a month

32 Tier 2 Continuum of Interventions

33 Tier 2 Continuum of Interventions
Intensive Targeted Modified CICO Matched to Function Intervention Assessment “Tweak”/ Small change to CICO Basic CICO Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems

34 Questions about Tier 2 Interventions Systems Considerations
What constitutes a Tier 2 Intervention? EFFICIENCY & MAXIMIZING RESOURCES An intervention that: Serves multiple students at one time (15-25 student at once) More efficient use of resources that 1 student at a time Students can get started with almost immediately upon referral Requires almost no legwork from referring staff to begin implementation of the intervention with a student All school staff know about, understand their role with, and know the referral process for SYSTEMS NOTE: Resources Required: If program is not self-sufficient… and requires significant organization by referring staff… it’s not a Tier 2/ targeted intervention

35 CICO from Basic to Advanced
Start with Basic CICO Should work for the majority of at-risk students Complete CICO Fidelity Assessment Once implementing CICO with fidelity & using data for decision making Data for student identification Data for student progress monitoring to ID responders/borderline/non-responders Start adding variations of CICO

36

37 CICO: Advanced Applications
Small Modifications or “Tweaks”

38 Additional Tier 2 Interventions
Remember focus on Efficiency in Progress Monitoring Meeting Minutes per Student Tweak or Small CICO Modification Alternate Tier 2 Intervention (Function-based) Escalate to Tier 3 Student Centered team Trust the Process Most difficult thing = not talking about a student before it’s time

39 Tier 2 Assessment & Intervention
Intensive Targeted Borderline Initial CICO Data Intervention Assessment “Tweak”/ Small change to CICO Student Referral Data (ODRs) Basic CICO Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems

40 Small Changes “Tweaks”
In Progress Monitoring meetings – always weighing Minutes/Kid Tweaks to the plan for Borderline Responders should only take a couple of “minutes” Look at initial CICO data Not an extensive discussion Should have a menu of quick changes/ “tweaks”: Change CICO mentor Change incentives Change/individualize goals More frequent check-ins -- “adding hair”

41 Borderline Responder Last 3 weeks of 16 days over 80%, but last 8 days -- 3 of 8 days over 80% “just missing”… but downward trend Good Candidate for a Small Change/ “Tweak” In 2 minutes or less - Which change is most likely to work for this student? Change (a) CICO mentor, (b) incentives, (c) individualize goals OR (d) more frequent check-ins

42 Borderline Responder Look at Initial CICO data
Quick Check: Anything we can do about Period 3?

43 Ready to Make Quick Changes
Readiness – what needs to be ready to make these ‘quick’ changes? Change/individualize goals Need alternate point card readily available to individualize Change CICO mentor Add Mid-Day Check-in & incentive Change incentives Individualize incentives for the student More frequent check-ins With teacher? With CICO Specialist? Need an adjusted point card?

44 Individualized Point Card Fill in more specific behaviors

45 Individualized Point Card
Robbie Oct. 14th 20--

46 More Frequent Check-Ins “CICO Hair Club for Kids”
Teacher gives more frequent feedback by applying hair – then uses hair to inform overall score for period Another Alternative – Create alternate card which breaks day into smaller intervals

47 Team Work Time What ‘tweaks’ do you want to develop to be ready for borderline responders? Adapt existing materials and/or Develop new materials required to make ‘tweaks’ readily available and accessible? Remember in the meeting, decisions regarding small intervention changes or ‘tweaks’ should occur in less then 2 minutes of discussion…. “Ready to Go” intervention options/ “tweaks” will make this as easy as possible

48 Non-Responders Modified (Function-Based) CICO

49 Tier 2 Assessment & Intervention
Intensive Targeted Non-Responder Preliminary FBA Modified CICO Matched to Function Borderline Initial CICO Data Intervention Assessment “Tweak”/ Small change to CICO Student Referral Data (ODRs) Basic CICO Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems

50 Non-Responder

51 Typical Reasons CICO may not be working for an individual student
Low fidelity of implementation The student needs more instruction on how to use the program The rewards are not powerful or desirable for the student The program does not match the function of the problem behavior The student requires more intensive, individualized support Address Implementation Issue Individualize Tier 2 Escalate to Tier 3 Support

52 Behavioral Explanations for “Why”
Don’t forget - From student’s perspective, problem behavior serves a purpose, such as… Gaining attention Gaining access to activities or tangible items Avoiding or escaping from something student finds unpleasant (e.g. difficult or undesired tasks)

53 Using Function of Behavior to Inform CICO Modifications
Individual Student Planning Can use “Function of Behavior” to match students to appropriate version of CICO Function-Based Assessment might include: Data from ODRs “Possible Motivation” Or Preliminary/Brief FBA

54

55 Minor – “Uh-Oh”

56 Preliminary FBA Use existing data for preliminary FBA ODR data
Identify function/motivation Identify antecedents – time/location/persons involved, etc. CICO data Identify antecedents – time/location

57 Non-Responder Preliminary FBA
Does this tell us anything about when/ where/ who is involved (antecedents)?

58 Preliminary FBA Discipline Referral Summaries
Suspensions, detentions, office referrals Look for patterns Triggers/Antecedents  Day of the week, Time of Day, Location, Students Involved Behavior Consequences/Function  Possible Motivation, Disciplinary Action, Administrative Decision

59 Student Referral Report - SWIS
Date Staff Time Location Prolem Behavior Motivation Others Involved Admin Decision 1 02/08/11 43866 12:15PM Plygd Agg/Fight Unknown mot Peers Out-sch susp 2 01/28/11 47522 1:30PM Class Disrespt Avoid Task Teacher Detention 3 01/10/11 10:30AM 4 12/18/10 9:30AM 5 12/08/10 1:00AM Peer 6 10:15AM Parent 7 11/20/10 9:30PM Does this tell us anything about the function of student behavior? How about when/ where/ who (Antecedents)?

60 Advanced Applications of CICO Function-Based Modifications of CICO

61 Breaks Are Better Function = Escape Task (elem)
Justin Boyd University of Oregon

62 Logic Guiding Breaks are Better
Children may benefit from taking small, appropriate breaks If breaks are available, students may: Engage in less escape-maintained problem behavior Request breaks less often than escape-maintained problem behavior occurred Increased reinforcement for: Asking for assistance Taking a break appropriately

63 CICO Modification Elementary Escape Academic Task
Explicitly teach an alternative/replacement behavior (i.e., break requests) Promote self-management by teaching students to “keep track” of their breaks Establish & Teach teachers (and students) how this will look in the classroom Make it feasible and sustainable for classroom teachers to implement

64 Breaks are Better Modifications
Prior to intervention: Child & teacher identify appropriate “break” activities Student is taught: How to request a break How to take a break How to return to work Points earned for: Meeting academic-specific expectations Asking for break appropriately or not needing a break Weekly point total tied to reinforcers

65 Sample Break Options & Rewards
Move to separate desk for quiet activity Quiet activity at desk Drawing Doodle on notebook Stretch in backroom Run errand for teacher Weekly Rewards Computer time Extra Recess Coupon for bonus points on assignments Coupons for buddy work Coupon to make assignment shorter or easier Library pass

66 Breaks are Better Card The goals are more specifically defined in academic terms The “break column” The “teacher feedback on break column”

67 Students will be trained by the BrB coordinator to use break request routine. This will be done by role playing positive and negative examples. I will show you an example teaching script in just a minute. Student’s are taught how to ask for a break the right way: (1) hold up hand with a “#1” signal; (2) wait for teacher to give a “thumbs up” signal or a “thumbs down”; They are also taught how to take a break: (3) when given the “thumbs up”, cross out one of the break circles on the BrB card; (4) start the 2-min break timer, (5) take the break appropriately (i.e., as practiced and for the appropriate length of time); and (6) when the timer goes off, get back to work. If the teacher responds to the break request with a “thumbs down”, the student is taught that it’s no big deal & they can request a break again later. Also, if they choose to (which we are recommending) teachers can remind them to request a break – thus helping to strengthen the student’s skills with knowing when to ask for a break, etc. 68

68 Taking a Break in the Classroom

69 ABC: Academic Behavior CICO Function = Escape Task (MS)
Jessica Turtura University of Oregon

70 Logic Guiding ABC Students benefit from organizational structure
More frequent and tangible reinforcement for: Recording assignments Completing in-class work & participating Asking for help Completing homework Parental structure for homework completion: Parents are aware of assignments Parents check for completion

71 Academic focused CICO (Escape Tasks) Middle School
Morning Check-in Students check-in with counselor All homework completed? Prepared for the school day with all necessary materials? Opportunity to complete unfinished homework and to gather materials Daily point card and Homework tracker Receive feedback each period about behavior during class (participation, staying on- task, completing work) Record assignments on homework tracker Afternoon Check-out Check-out with counselor Review point card and homework tracker Does student know what is due tomorrow? Have all materials needed to complete assignments? Home Component Parents review daily feedback with student Sign card to indicate if student has completed all homework

72 ABC Modifications Prior to intervention – coordinator meets w/ parents
Morning Check-In: Assess & give bonus pts for: Materials Ready & Homework Completed Afternoon check-out: Check Tracker Expectations focus on Academic Behaviors + Add’l Expectation of completing Tracker Parent signature with focus on Homework Completion

73 ABC Point Card -- Front

74 ABC Point Card -- Back

75 Non-Responders Escalate to Tier 3

76 Tier 2 Assessment & Intervention
Intensive Targeted Refer to Tier 3 team: Practical FBA Individualized Behavior Support Plan Non-Responder Preliminary FBA Modified CICO Matched to Function Borderline Initial CICO Data Intervention Assessment “Tweak”/ Small change to CICO Student Referral Data (ODRs) Basic CICO Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems

77 Borderline Responders: Problem Solving Progress Monitoring Team
Tier I Tier II Tier III Universal SWPBIS Team Progress Monitoring Team FBA Team Monitors effectiveness and fidelity of Tier 2 Interventions (overall and for each student) Plans SW & Class-wide supports Conducts FBA, develops BIP NOT a standing team Sept. 1, 2009 78 78

78 Tier 2 Intervention Coordinator
> 1 hour meeting Review Tasks Process Monitor Facilitator Notetaker Tier 2 Intervention Coordinator Tier 3 Intervention Coordinator Screening Coordinator

79 Non-Responder Tweak ABC CICO After multiple interventions, including match to function-based CICO RTI  Time to move to Tier 3 Support

80 Individual PBIS Team Team Members:
Student 1 FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team Individual PBIS Team Tier 2/3 Progress Monitoring (Systems & Students) Team Members: Administrator Behavior Specialists -e.g. SPSY, SPED CICO Coordinator -e.g. counselor, IA Meets every 2 wks min. Meeting 1 Permissions Coordinate Assessment (FBA) Meeting 2 Review Assessment& Finalize Implementation Plan Meeting 3 Monitor Student Progress & Review/Modify Plan Meetings Ongoing as needed to Monitor Student Progress & Review/Modify Plan

81 Tier 2/3 Progress Monitoring (Systems & Students)
FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team Student 2 FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team Individual PBIS Team Tier 2/3 Progress Monitoring (Systems & Students) Team Members: Administrator Behavior Specialists -e.g. SPSY, SPED CICO Coordinator -e.g. counselor, IA Meets every 2 wks min. Student 3 FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team Student 4 FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team

82 A Proactive Approach to Behavior Support Planning
Majority of problem behaviors that teams encounter do not require comprehensive FBA-BSP (Loman & Horner, in press) Using simplified FBA-BSP procedures that “match” the level and intensity of problem behavior Provide FBS at the first signs of persistent problem behavior Basic FBA: Behaviors and Maintaining Functions are Easily Defined and Identified Complex FBA: Behaviors and Maintaining Functions Vary, and are not Easily Defined and/or Identified Alternative that researchers have suggested , using Function based support proactively 83

83 District Behavior Support Specialist
Train and coach PBIS at all three tiers Support Teams building behavior support plans from Assessment information Train 1-2 people per school to conduct “basic” FBA/BSP

84 Building Capacity for Function-Based Support
Basic FBA2BSP Training Series of minute trainings (each training spaced about 2 weeks apart) Session 1: Basics of Behavior Session 2: FBA Interview Session 3: FBA Observation Session 4: Function-Based Intervention Session 5: Behavior Support Planning Session 6: Implementation Planning Session 7: Evaluation Plan & Monitoring

85 Format of Basic FBA to BSP Training Sessions
Objectives Review Activities Checks for Understanding Comments/ Questions Tasks Key Points


Download ppt "Data Teaming for Tier 2 Systems of SW-PBIS"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google