1. Achieving large scale, long term invasive American mink control in Northern-Scotland despite short term funding
Xavier Lambin Chris Horrill Rob Raynor
& loads more people

2. Bold or Foolish?? An invasive control project that …
Tackled the American mink, one of the worlds most difficult invasive species after prevention failed
On a ridiculously large (29,000 km2) “bit of an island”
Without secured long-term funding
With a fuzzy, ever shifting,
endpoint
Using mostly unpaid “citizen-
conservationists volunteers

3. From Rio to Aberdeenshire: Biodiversity Action plans a bottom up process arising from UK Government’s response to Rio 1992
Water vole driven towards extinction by mink invasion. “At least 95 % of the sites occupied in the 1950ies were lost by 2000.”

4. Modest beginnings remove mink from 30 km2
Objective: to safeguard a remnant lowland water vole metapopulations surrounded by American mink

5. The Cairngorms Water Vole Conservation Project (2007–2009)
A defensible stronghold for water voles? If anywhere, mink control can be achieved in the Cairngorms National Park
The Cairngorms Water Vole Conservation Project (2007–2009)

6. 1000 Mink rafts: a low tech breakthrough and key component of coverage and participation
Bryce et al (2011), Biological Conservation 144, 575–583 6

7. Mink density decreased with increasing years of control despite density dependent fecundity and dispersal
Oliver et al (2016) Biological Invasions 18,
Melero et al (2015) Biological Invasions 17,

8. Federation of local institutions: Embedding invasive management with users of salmon resources to ensure legacy (2011–2015)
Transfer of management responsibility to river trusts to ensure mink control and monitoring is self-sustained with limited (but not zero!) input of additional resources.

9. Partnership and volunteers removed breeding mink from over a 29,000 km2 area bounded by seas and mountains

10. Mink density bounced back then decreased again
Oliver et al (2016) Biological Invasions 18,
Melero et al (2015) Biological Invasions 17,

11. After a long 2 year gap,
arose the Scottish Invasive species Initiative ( )
Vision: Transferring approach refined with mink to other invasive species
Wider public engagement
Self sustained volunteers is key
deliverable

12. Ongoing control short of eradication: Lessons learned, challenges yet to overcome

13. Challenge (1): the funding roller coaster: short term funding of long term conservation is wasteful
300
300
250
200
Annual spend (x£1000)
150
100 50
1996
1997
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2019
2021
Lambin, et al 2019 in Island invasives: scaling up to meet the challenge, IUCN 651

14. Challenge (1): the funding roller coaster: short term funding of long term conservation risks loss of achievement
Short term funding is a major obstacle and increases the cost of long term invasive control. Repeated gaps in funding, associated staff turnover, re-badging of project are all damaging to the trust relationship built with volunteers.

15. Challenge (1): the funding roller coaster: short term funding of long term conservation is wasteful
We all know we will still be at in after 2022
Succession planning is required now (as with
Towards an integrated invasive project (squirrels, mink plants)?

16. Mean natal dispersal 20 km 20 % movements > 80 km
Scale! Mink are stupendous dispersers! 90 % of mink emigrate, and dispersal is large scale
Mean natal dispersal 20 km
20 % movements > 80 km
Oliver et al (2016), Biol Inv

17. Challenge (2): no refuges from control.
East coast coastal burn and bird cliffs were long overlooked

18. Challenge (2b): no refuges from control.
Some individuals managing protected areas resisted spatially exhaustive control, despite institution support

19. >> Challenge (2c): no refuges from control.
Some river management organisations were small, poorly resourced, or archaic
Government re-structuring of organisations reduced coordination
>>

20. Challenge 3: Mobilising and sustaining citizen conservationists
Utilizing and coordinating the existing skilled workforce, such as gamekeepers and fishing ghillies; facilitated their roles as volunteers within a coordinated partnership

21. Challenge 3: Mobilising citizen conservationists CAN deliver large-scale, long-term conservation BUT
Retention is key and volunteers cannot be seen as merely cheap labour
Volunteers must be creatively enthused (with success and science stories), replenished with ongoing recruitment
Volunteer diverse motivations (place attachment, desire to take action, personal fulfilment) must be understood and respected
Inclusive public engagement and volunteer motivations may clash with rationalised invasive management.
Tension between optimisation of management vs motivations of volunteers and inclusive participation in governance
Pagès et al (2018) J Env Mgmt

22. Challenge 4: No built in resilience to extreme events

23. Summing up: Long term management despite short term funding
American mink can technically be controlled
Short term funding is a major obstacle and increases the cost of long term invasive control. Repeated gaps in funding, associated staff turnover, re-badging of project are all damaging to the trust relationship built with volunteers.
Succession planning is required now. INNS projects United!
Mink control is socially acceptable but ensuring comprehensive management is a constant battle.
Tepid buy-in by some critical land managing organisations could destroy the covenant with volunteers asked to kill for conservation

24. Tasty water voles recovered well before the last mink was removed, … Golden eagles believe the project is a success!

25. Acknowledgements: 2,652 volunteer-years and a multidisciplinary team effort
Project officers: Jamie Urquhart, Laura Taylor, Ros Bryce, Hollie Sutherland, Helen Gray, Llinos Davies, Anne Marie MacMaster, Gunnar Scholts, Jim Mann
Conservation partners: Chris Horrill, Rob Raynor
Ecology Researchers: Matthew Oliver, Yolanda Melero, Elaine Fraser
Social Sciences researchers: Anna Evely, Marie Pagès, René van der Wal, Koen Arts
Computer science Researchers: René van der Wal, Koen Arts, Nava Tintarev, Nirwan Sharma, Gemma Webster, Chris Mellish,
Yaji Sripada :