Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

April 27, 2015.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "April 27, 2015."— Presentation transcript:

1 April 27, 2015

2 Principles of Government
Description Limited Government Republicanism Checks and Balances Federalism Separation of powers Popular Sovereignty Individual Rights Warm Up Add Supreme Court Cases Review to your Student Portfolio Grade Sheet (Page 100). 1:10-5:36

3 I can summarize the issues, decisions, and significance of landmark Supreme Court cases by creating a thinking map. Learning Target

4 Student Expectation (SE)
8.18A identify the origin of judicial review and analyze examples of congressional and presidential responses; 8.18B summarize the issues, decisions, and significance of landmark Supreme Court cases, including Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland, and Gibbons v. Ogden; and Student Expectation (SE)

5 Historical Significance
Supreme Court Cases Historical Significance Marbury v. Madison This was the first Supreme Court case to apply the principle of Judicial Review. Judicial Review is the power of federal courts to void laws which are in violation of the constitution. McCulloh v. Maryland Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution) to create the second bank of the United States. The state of Maryland lacked the power to tax the Bank because the Federal Government is the supreme law of the Land. Gibbons v. Ogden Steamship operators were fighting over shipping rights between New York and New Jersey. Only the federal government has the power to regulate interstate commerce. Worcester v Georgia Georgia's citizens were illegally moving on Cherokee land in an attempt to find gold. Worchester took the Cherokee problems to the Supreme Court. They ruled, "The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community occupying its own territory in which the laws of Georgia can have no force”. Dred Scott v. Sandford Dred Scott resided in both slave and free states. Scott argued because he lived in a free state he was a Freedman. The court found that no black, free or slave, could claim U.S. citizenship, and therefore blacks were unable to petition the court for their freedom. Supreme Court Cases

6 Closing Question


Download ppt "April 27, 2015."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google