Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byOttó Bogdán Modified over 5 years ago
1
Planetarium Resuscitation Ongo-06 February 14th, 2002
Client: ISU Physics and Astronomy Dept. Faculty Advisor: Dr. John P. Basart Team Members: Kyle Foster; CprE (team leader) Scott Senst; CprE Len Shaw; EE Jon Ryan; EE Curt Hammer; EE
2
Presentation Outline Problem Statement Design Objectives
End-Product Description Assumptions Limitations Project Risks and Concerns Technical Approach Evaluation of Project Success Future Work Human Hours Financial Budget Lessons Learned Closing Summary Acknowledgements Questions?
3
Problem Statement Background:
The ISU planetarium consists of an optical projection system with a control system that allows for operation and voice recording. Over the years, the original hardware control system began to fail, and the projector became inoperable in 1992.
4
Problem Statement Technical Problem:
The team will complete the design and implement a new control system for the planetarium projector using new hardware and a standard personal computer (PC). The software driven control system must be flexible and should be able to perform recording as well as operating the projector and peripherals.
5
Design Objectives Design new computer controls for original planetarium projector Control all lighting of the projector Control all motor movements of the projector Replace the analog recorder with digital one Create a recognizable interface for projector operators Operate with low light emissions
6
End-Product Description
Projector should perform all control functions through new interface Software, hardware and the projector should be fully tested and debugged Design should be easily upgradeable Installation into the planetarium by semester end
7
Assumptions Both Opto-22 controllers are functional
GUI operates on a Windows 98 based system Operating environment shall be the ISU planetarium New system setup will fit in the ISU planetarium
8
Limitations Restored projector shall maintain all functions of the original projector GUI shall imitate the original control panel for the benefit of past users Limited budget Opto-22 hardware is donated and not easily replaceable
9
Project Risks and Concerns
Loss of critical personnel Loss of data Failure of critical equipment Overspending
10
Technical Approach Familiar design of GUI Configurable GUI
11
Technical Approach OptoControl software Opto-22 configuration
12
Technical Approach Wiring between Opto-22’s and Projector Power Supply
13
Technical Approach Cabinet Installation Planetarium Installation
14
Evaluation of Project Success
Milestones Percent complete Opto-22 networking 95% GUI Testing of lights Testing of motors 100% Configuration of the Opto-22 Installation 0% Opto-22 connections 65%
15
Future Work Installation of the projector into the planetarium marks the end of this project. Possibilities for future work: Improve on recording capabilities Upgrade of the PC Add software for complete automation Additional auxiliary functions
16
Human Hours Name Estimated Hours Actual Hours to date Kyle Foster 121
68 Scott Senst 117 63 Len Shaw 113 71 Jon Ryan 110 65 Curt Hammer 69
17
Financial Budget Budget for this school year
18
Lessons Learned What went well: Weekly gatherings
Team problem management What did not go well: No previous documentation Project turnover
19
Closing Summary The ISU Planetarium Resuscitation project will give physics and astronomy professors the ability to control the entire ISU Planetarium from a PC. This project will save professors’ time and will also make using the planetarium lights and motors easier when performing a show. The technical approach to this problem used by the team allows these goals to be accomplished and leaves room for further development in the future.
20
Acknowledgements OPTO-22 Mike Cook, SSOL Dr. Lee Anne Willson
Joe Eitter Dr. John P. Basart
21
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.