Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMonika Viken Modified over 5 years ago
1
Simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
G.R. Lorello, D.A. Cook, R.L. Johnson, R. Brydges British Journal of Anaesthesia Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014) DOI: /bja/aet414 Copyright © 2014 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 Trial flow diagram. British Journal of Anaesthesia , DOI: ( /bja/aet414) Copyright © 2014 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 Random-effects meta-analysis of comparisons between simulation-based training and no intervention (positive numbers favour simulation): knowledge, time, skill, behaviour, and patient outcomes. British Journal of Anaesthesia , DOI: ( /bja/aet414) Copyright © 2014 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
4
Fig 3 Subgroup analysis of studies comparing simulation-based training with no intervention (positive numbers favour simulation): skills outcomes. British Journal of Anaesthesia , DOI: ( /bja/aet414) Copyright © 2014 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
5
Fig 4 Random-effects meta-analysis of comparisons between simulation-based and non-simulation instruction (positive numbers favour simulation): satisfaction, knowledge, time, skill, behaviour, and patient outcomes. British Journal of Anaesthesia , DOI: ( /bja/aet414) Copyright © 2014 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
6
Fig 5 Random-effects meta-analysis of comparisons between two alternative simulation-based training interventions: (a) anatomically correct simulator vs non-anatomically correct box trainer (positive numbers favour anatomically correct); (b) added non-technical skills vs ‘routine’ simulation-based training (positive numbers favour added non-technical skills); and (c) information sources during debriefing (positive numbers favour multiple information sources). British Journal of Anaesthesia , DOI: ( /bja/aet414) Copyright © 2014 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.