1. Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 13-17 (March 2017)
Revision total knee arthroplasty using a custom tantalum implant in a patient following multiple failed revisions 
Colin A. McNamara, BS, Raúl G. Gösthe, MD, Preetesh D. Patel, MD, Kristopher C. Sanders, MD, Gustavo Huaman, MD, Juan C. Suarez, MD 
Arthroplasty Today 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (March 2017)
DOI: /j.artd
Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
(a) Preoperative anteroposterior femur radiograph. (b) Preoperative anteroposterior tibia radiograph. (c) Preoperative lateral femur radiograph. (d) Preoperative lateral tibia radiograph.
Arthroplasty Today 2017 3, 13-17DOI: ( /j.artd )
Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
(a) Preoperative (post fall) anteroposterior tibia radiograph. (b) Preoperative (post fall) lateral tibia radiograph.
Arthroplasty Today 2017 3, 13-17DOI: ( /j.artd )
Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3 Photograph of custom tantalum cone.
Arthroplasty Today 2017 3, 13-17DOI: ( /j.artd )
Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4
Intraoperative photograph of distal femur after removal of prior implant.
Arthroplasty Today 2017 3, 13-17DOI: ( /j.artd )
Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

6. Figure 5 Custom tantalum cone inserted.
Arthroplasty Today 2017 3, 13-17DOI: ( /j.artd )
Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

7. Figure 6
(a) Postoperative anteroposterior knee radiograph. (b) Postoperative anteroposterior femur radiograph. (c) Postoperative anteroposterior tibia radiograph.
Arthroplasty Today 2017 3, 13-17DOI: ( /j.artd )
Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

8. Figure 7 Two-year postoperative anteroposterior knee radiograph.
Arthroplasty Today 2017 3, 13-17DOI: ( /j.artd )
Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions