Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Multipole Magnets from Maxwell’s Equations
Alex Bogacz USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
2
Maxwell’s Equations for Magnets - Outline
Solutions to Maxwell’s equations for magneto static fields: in two dimensions (multipole fields) in three dimensions (fringe fields, insertion devices...) How to construct multipole fields in two dimensions, using electric currents and magnetic materials, considering idealized situations. A. Wolski, Academic Lectures, University of Liverpool , 2008 USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
3
Basis Vector calculus in Cartesian and polar coordinate systems;
Stokes’ and Gauss’ theorems Maxwell’s equations and their physical significance Types of magnets commonly used in accelerators. following notation used in: A. Chao and M. Tigner, “Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering,” World Scientific (1999). USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
4
Maxwell’s equations USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
5
Maxwell’s equations USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
6
Physical interpretation of
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
7
Physical interpretation of
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
8
Linearity and superposition
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
9
Multipole fields USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
10
Multipole fields USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
11
Multipole fields USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
12
Multipole fields USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
13
Multipole fields USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
14
Multipole fields USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
15
Generating multipole fields from a current distribution
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
16
Multipole fields from a current distribution
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
17
Multipole fields from a current distribution
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
18
Multipole fields from a current distribution
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
19
Multipole fields from a current distribution
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
20
Multipole fields from a current distribution
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
21
Multipole fields from a current distribution
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
22
Multipole fields from a current distribution
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
23
Multipole fields from a current distribution
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
24
Multipole fields from a current distribution
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
25
Multipole fields from a current distribution
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
26
Superconducting quadrupole - collider final focus
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
27
Multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
28
Multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
29
Multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
30
Multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
31
Multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
32
Multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
33
Multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
34
Multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
35
Multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
36
Multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
37
Multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
38
Generating multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
39
Generating multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
40
Generating multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
41
Generating multipole fields in an iron-core magnet
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
42
Maxwell’s Equations for Magnets - Summary
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
43
Maxwell’s Equations for Magnets - Summary
Maxwell’s equations impose strong constraints on magnetic fields that may exist. The linearity of Maxwell’s equations means that complicated fields may be expressed as a superposition of simpler fields. In two dimensions, it is convenient to represent fields as a superposition of multipole fields. Multipole fields may be generated by sinusoidal current distributions on a cylinder bounding the region of interest. In regions without electric currents, the magnetic field may be derived as the gradient of a scalar potential. The scalar potential is constant on the surface of a material with infinite permeability. This property is useful for defining the shapes of iron poles in multipole magnets. USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
44
Multipoles in Magnets - Outline
Deduce that the symmetry of a magnet imposes constraints on the possible multipole field components, even if we relax the constraints on the material properties and other geometrical properties; Consider different techniques for deriving the multipole field components from measurements of the fields within a magnet; Discuss the solutions to Maxwell’s equations that may be used for describing fields in three dimensions. USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
45
Previous lecture re-cap
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
46
Previous lecture re-cap
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
47
Allowed and forbidden harmonics
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
48
Allowed and forbidden harmonics
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
49
Allowed and forbidden harmonics
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
50
Allowed and forbidden harmonics
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
51
Allowed and forbidden harmonics
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
52
Allowed and forbidden harmonics
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
53
Measuring multipoles USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
54
Measuring multipoles in Cartesian basis
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
55
Measuring multipoles in Cartesian basis
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
56
Measuring multipoles in Polar basis
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
57
Measuring multipoles in Polar basis
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
58
Measuring multipoles in Polar basis
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
59
Advantages of mode decompositions
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
60
Three-dimensional fields
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
61
Three-dimensional fields
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
62
Three-dimensional fields
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
63
Three-dimensional fields
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
64
Three-dimensional fields
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
65
Measuring multipoles in Polar basis
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
66
Multipoles in Polar basis – including x-dependence
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
67
Three-dimensional fields
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
68
Three-dimensional fields - Cylindrical basis
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
69
Three-dimensional fields - Cylindrical basis
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
70
Three-dimensional fields - Cylindrical basis
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
71
Three-dimensional fields - Cylindrical basis
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
72
Three-dimensional fields - Cylindrical basis
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
73
Three-dimensional fields - Cylindrical basis
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
74
Summary – Part II Symmetries in multipole magnets restrict the multipole components that can be present in the field. It is useful to be able to find the multipole components in a given field from numerical field data: but this must be done carefully, if the results are to be accurate. Usually, it is advisable to calculate multipole components using field data on a surface enclosing the region of interest: any errors or residuals will decrease exponentially within that region, away from the boundary. Outside the boundary, residuals will increase exponentially. Techniques for finding multipole components in two dimensional fields can be generalized to three dimensions, allowing analysis of fringe fields and insertion devices. In two or three dimensions, it is possible to use a Cartesian basis for the field modes; but a polar basis is sometimes more convenient. USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
75
Appendix A - The vector potential
A scalar potential description of the magnetic field has been very useful to derive the shape for the pole face of a multipole magnet. USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
76
Appendix A - The vector potential
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
77
Appendix A - The vector potential
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
78
Appendix A - The vector potential
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
79
The vector potential USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
80
The vector potential USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
81
The vector potential USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
82
The vector potential USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
83
The vector potential USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
84
Appendix A - The vector potential
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
85
Appendix A - The vector potential
USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
86
Appendix B - Field Error Tolerances
Focusing ‘point’ error perturbs the betatron motion leading to the Courant-Snyder invariant change: Beam envelope and beta-function oscillate at double the betatron frequency USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
87
Appendix B - Field Error Tolerances
Single point mismatch as measured by the Courant-Snyder invariant change: Each source of field error (magnet) contributes the following Courant-Snyder variation here, m =1 quadrupole, m =2 sextupole, m=3 octupole, etc USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
88
Appendix B - Field Error Tolerances
Cumulative mismatch along the lattice (N sources): Standard deviation of the Courant-Snyder invariant is given by: Assuming weakly focusing lattice (uniform beta modulation) the following averaging (over the betatron phase) can by applied: USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
89
Appendix B - Field Error Tolerances
Some useful integrals …. : will reduce the coherent contribution to the C-S variance as follows: Including the first five multipoles yields: USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
90
Appendix B - Field Error Tolerances
Beam radius at a given magnet is : One can define a ‘good fileld radius’ for a given type of magnet as: Assuming the same multipole content for all magnets in the class one gets: The first factor purely depends on the beamline optics (focusing), while the second one describes field tolerance (nonlinearities) of the magnets: USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
91
Appendix B - Field Error Tolerances
Standard deviation of the Courant-Snyder invariant: where: USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
92
Appendix B - Field Error Tolerances
multipole expansion coefficients of the azimuthal magnetic field, Bq - Fourier series representation in polar coordinates at a given point along the trajectory): multipole gradient and integrated geometric gradient: USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
93
Appendix B - Field Error Tolerances
The linear errors, m =1, cause the betatron mismatch – invariant ellipse distortion from the design ellipse without changing its area – no emittance increase. By design, one can tolerate some level (e.g. 10%) of Arc-to-Arc betatron mismatch due to the focusing errors, df1 (quad gradient errors and dipole body gradient) to be compensated by the dedicated matching quads The higher, m > 1, multipoles will contribute to the emittance dilution – ‘limited’ by design via a separate allowance per each segment (Arc, linac) (e.g. 1%) USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
94
Appendix B - Field Error Tolerances
Here one assumes the following multipole content for the dipoles and quads: Quads: sextupole (m = 2), octupole (m = 3), duodecapole (m = 5) and icosapole (m = 9) Dipoles: sextupole (m = 2) and decapole (m = 4) The values of multipoles are calculated in the extreme case – a given order (m) multipole by itself exhausts the emittance dilution allowance of 1%. One can use the above analytic formalism to set the magnet error tolerances for specific groups (types) of magnets (dipoles and quads) within each lattice segment (Arc, linac) For each group of magnets within each segment one needs to evaluate: USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
95
Cumulative C-S invariant change due to magnet errors
Assuming the same multipole content for all magnets in the class one gets: C-S mis-match emittance dilution ‘Beam region’ defined by : The first factor purely depends on the beamline optics (focusing), while the second one describes field errors of the magnets USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2011
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.