1. Proposed Evaluation Methodology Addition
April 2009
doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
Proposed Evaluation Methodology Addition
January 2010
Date:
Name
Affiliation
Address
Phone
Shu Kato
NICT
Yokosuka, Japan
John R. Barr
Deer Park, IL USA
Tuncer Baykas
Hiroshi Harada
Ali Sadri
Intel
Jason Trachewsky
Broadcom
John Dorsey
Apple
Mark Grodzinsky
Wilocity
Matt Smith
Atheros
James Yee
MediaTek
Su Khiong (SK) Yong
Marvell
Shu Kato, NICT
Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

2. January 2010
Abstract
This document proposes an additional clause to the Evaluation Methodology document for better co-existence of proposals and the existing systems in the same band
Shu Kato, NICT

3. January 2010
Proposed Addition
Proposers shall describe mechanisms by which coexistence of an adAP and other 60 GHz systems and standards in the band
Add clause to section 2 or 4 for FR Req08:
Proposers shall describe mechanisms by which coexistence of an ad AP and other 60 GHz systems and standards in the band is covered by the proposal. This should include coexistence with IEEE c. Those mechanisms may include energy detection, preamble detection or the use of some universal mode to communicate between the ad AP and the devices of the other 60GHz systems and standards.  Once an interferer is detected, the ad AP should avoid interference through the use of beamforming, use of alternate available channel or other means to coexist. If the ad AP and the devices of the other 60GHz systems and standards operate co-channel, the performance of the coexistence mechanism can be measured by the effective throughput of the device in the presence of the interferer operating within the band.
Shu Kato, NICT

4. January 2010
Conclusion
This document has proposed an additional clause to Evaluation Methodology document for better coexistence
The proposed clause reflects the comments received on the doc. IEEE802.11/1160r3
The proposed clause will not force any burden but ask the necessary mechanisms of co-existence
Shu Kato, NICT