Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

IEEE TGmc March 2014 Agenda Date: Authors:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "IEEE TGmc March 2014 Agenda Date: Authors:"— Presentation transcript:

1 IEEE 802.11 TGmc March 2014 Agenda Date: 2014-03-20 Authors:
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 IEEE TGmc March 2014 Agenda Date: Authors: Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

2 July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 Abstract This presentation contains the IEEE TGmc agenda for the March 2014 session. Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

3 TGmc Agenda March 2014 Tuesday PM1 Wednesday PM2 Thursday PM1
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 TGmc Agenda Tuesday PM1 Chair’s Welcome, Status, Review of Objectives, Approve agenda, minutes Editor’s Report Timeline and Schedule Comment resolution – 11ad 2199, 2110 ( , 406) Carlos, 2436 ( r1), CID 2065, , Adrian Wednesday PM2 CIDs 2423, 2424 – ERP PHY CIDs 2411, 2412 – DSSS deprecation – Privacy enhancements Thursday PM1 CID 2199, Adrian Tuesday PM2 Motions – telecons Comment resolution – CID 2043 (Qi Wang), Thursday PM2 Comment Resolution – , , CIDs 2468, 2490 – BHart, 2409 (GSmith), 2434 MHamilton Motions Plans for May, Schedule, AOB Adjourn Wednesday PM1 Comment Resolution – 11ad 2170 ( ), Location ( , , ) Attendance reminder: Documents: Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

4 TGmc – Tuesday PM1 March 2014 Call Meeting to Order
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 TGmc – Tuesday PM1 Call Meeting to Order Policies and Procedures, Attendance reminder **IEEE Patent Policy Are there any patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that the participant believes may be essential for the use of that standard? Minute any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. ** Read slide deck *** Note especially items #7 & #11 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

5 July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 Please review the documents at the following links: -  IEEE Patent Policy -  -  Patent FAQ -  -  LoA Form -  -  Affiliation FAQ - -  Anti-Trust FAQ -  -  Ethics -  -  IEEE Working Group P&P -      802 WG P&P: New 802 LMSC P&P: New 802 LMSC OM: Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

6 Logistics Attendance recording procedures Documentation
July 2010 May 2010 doc.: IEEE /0503r4 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 Logistics Attendance recording procedures See 11-09/0246r0 Must register before logging attendance Must log attendance during each 2 hour session Documentation Use “TGm” for documents relating to the Revision PAR Slide 6 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Page 6 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion

7 Monday PM1 (continued) Objectives Approve prior meeting minutes
July 2010 May 2010 doc.: IEEE /0503r4 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 Monday PM1 (continued) Objectives Comment resolution Approve prior meeting minutes Editor’s Report (Adrian Stephens) Slide 7 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Page 7 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion

8 July 2010 May 2010 doc.: IEEE /0503r4 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 TGmc Plan of Record 20 July 2012 – 12 Sept 2012 – Call for Comment/Input 29-30 Aug 2012 – NesCom, SASB PAR Approval Sept 2012 – Begin to process input Sept 2012 – 11aa, 11ae integration Jan – First WG Letter ballot - without 11ad Dec 2012 – March/May – 11ad integration Sept 2013 – Letter ballot on D2.0 Dec 2013 – March 2014 – 11ac integration Letter Ballot on D3.0 (includes 11ac) March 2014 Mar 2014 – April 2014 – 11af integration Letter Ballot on D4.0 (includes 11af) July 2014 July 2014 – Mandatory Draft Review Jul - Aug 2014 – Form Sponsor Pool (45 days) Nov 14 – Initial Sponsor Ballot July 2015– WG/EC Final Approval Sept 2015 – RevCom/SASB Approval Slide 8 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Page 8 Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

9 TGmc – Wednesday PM2 March 2014 2411 2412 CIDs 2423, 2424 – ERP PHY
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 TGmc – Wednesday PM2 2411 16 As noted in CID 32,"11b is Poison". Clause 16 devices have the capability of bringing 2.4GHz networks to their knees. 13/0416 (latest is r5 at time of writing comment) shows that there is no technical reason to maintain Clause 16 devices. It is suggested that a note be added to this Clause to indicate that it is now 'out of favor' and that it is likely to be dropped in the (near) future. Add text under heading "Devices supporting the DSSS system are no longer encouraged and likely to be deprecated from this Specification in subsequent revisions" 2412 17 As noted in CID 32,"11b is Poison". Clause 17 devices are coupled to Clause 16 DSSS and as such have the capability of bringing 2.4GHz networks to their knees. 13/0416 (latest is r5 at time of writing comment) shows that there is no technical reason to maintain Clause 16 or 17 devices. It is suggested that a note be added to this Clause to indicate that it is now 'out of favor' and that it is likely to be dropped in the (near) future. Add text under heading "Devices supporting the high rate extention to the DSSS system are no longer encouraged and likely to be deprecated from this Specification in subsequent revisions" CIDs 2423, 2424 – ERP PHY CIDs 2411, 2412 – DSSS deprecation Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

10 TGmc – Wednesday PM2 March 2014 2423 2424 CIDs 2423, 2424 – ERP PHY
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 TGmc – Wednesday PM2 2423 9.1.2 The standard requires 11n and 11g (i.e., HT and ERP) PHYs to support transmit and receive of all 11b modes. Given the enormous disparity in efficiency between 11b and the OFDM modes, this no longer makes sense as a universal requirement for all products, and any such requirements should be removed, if not necessary to support coexistence. A straightforward way of accomplishing at least some of this is to remove the requirement that ERP PHYs support the 5.5 and 11 Mbps CCK data rates. Since Clause 20 (HT) references Clause 19 (ERP), this would remove 5.5 and 11 Mbps as requirements for HT also. This would not affect the requirment to be able to detect the long or short preamble (1 Mbps and 2 Mbps) and to take appropriate action based on such a detection, thus preserving the current level of coexistence. Delete 5.5 and 11 from list of mandatory data rates for ERP PHY. Also make corresponding changes throughout, including section (P2048 LL30-37) (add 5.5 and 11 to list of exceptions); section (P2054 LL39-40) (delete 5.5 and 11 from list); and Annex B.4.9 (P2307 LL33-37) (remove 5.5 and 11; add new entry ERP1a for 5.5 and 11, optional) 2424 9.1.3 The standard requires 11n and 11g (i.e., HT and ERP) PHYs to support transmit and receive of the 11b Short Preamble. This is optional for 11b. This requirement no longer makes sense (if it ever did), as there are legacy deployed devices that do not recognize the short preamble or defer for it, and it seems that most deployed devices do not transmit the short preamble. Remove the sentence beginning "In addition, it is mandatory ...". Also make corresponding changes throughout, including section (P2052 LL32-41) (change "three" to "two" and delete short preamble from list; add extra line saying that an ERP STA may support the short preamble); section (P2053 L16) (delete sentence begiining "For the ERP..."); section (P2054 L40) (delete "or short"), and (P2054 L46) (delete "short preamble"). CIDs 2423, 2424 – ERP PHY CIDs 2411, 2412 – DSSS deprecation Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

11 Timeline Info 11mc ballot in March or May March 2014 July 2010
doc.: IEEE /0503r4 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 Timeline Info 11mc ballot in March or May Slide 11 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Page 11 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion

12 July 2010 May 2010 doc.: IEEE /0503r4 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 Work items from Jan 2014 Liaison letter to WFA – Brian Hart, Andrew Myles Usage related text, rather than excision – Menzo, Carlos C “Should not” behavior text – Sean Slide 12 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Page 12 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion

13 March 2014 Deprecation CID documents
July 2010 May 2010 doc.: IEEE /0503r4 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 March 2014 Deprecation CID documents Slide 13 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Page 13 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion

14 July 2010 May 2010 doc.: IEEE /0503r4 doc.: IEEE /0415r0 March 2014 Straw Polls Straw Poll 1: I support the following change (Y/N/A): In Clause 16.1 (DSSS PHY specification for the 2.4GHz band designated for ISM applications—General), add “A DSSS (Clause 16) STA should support the mandatory features of Clause 19 (ERP).” In Clause 17.1 (HR/DSSS PHY Specification—General), add “An HR/DSSS (Clause 17) STA should support the mandatory features of Clause 19 (ERP).” Result: Yes: 22, No: 8, Abstain: 13 Straw Poll 2: I support the following change (Y/N/A) : In Clause (Rate selection for other individually addressed Data and Management frames), add “An ERP STA should not transmit other individually addressed Data and Management frames to ERP STAs using the 5.5Mbps or 11Mbps rates.” Result: Yes: 12, No: 13, Abstain: 18 Slide 14 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Page 14 Sean Coffey, Realtek Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion

15 July 2010 May 2010 doc.: IEEE /0503r4 doc.: IEEE /0415r0 March 2014 Straw Polls Straw Poll 3: I support the following change (Y/N/A): In Clause (Rate selection for other individually addressed Data and Management frames), add “An ERP STA that transmits a frame to an ERP STA using the 1Mbps or 2Mbps rate and that receives an acknowledgment or block acknowledgment with a received energy that is equal to or greater than –62 dBm should use an ERP-OFDM rate or HT or VHT rate for the next frame transmitted to that STA.” “An ERP STA should not transmit a Probe Request using the 1Mbps or 2Mbps rate in any channel unless it has received no response to a Probe Request transmitted a Probe Request using the 6Mbps rate in that channel within the previous TUs.” Result: Yes: 4, No: 28, Abstain: 12 Slide 15 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Page 15 Sean Coffey, Realtek Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion

16 July 2010 May 2010 doc.: IEEE /0503r4 doc.: IEEE /0415r0 March 2014 Straw Polls Straw Poll 4: I support the following change (Y/N/A): In change from Of these rates, transmission and reception capability for 1, 2, 5.5, 6, 11, 12, and 24 Mb/s data rates is mandatory.” to Of these rates, reception capability for 1, 2, 5.5, 6, 11, 12, and 24 Mb/s data rates is mandatory, transmission capability for 1, 2, 5.5, and 11 Mb/s is optional, and is not recommended, for data and management frames, but transmission capability for 6, 12, and 24 Mb/s data rates is mandatory.” Result: Yes: 12, No:16 , Abstain: 14 Slide 16 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Page 16 Sean Coffey, Realtek Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion

17 Straw Polls Straw poll 5: I support the following change (Y/N/A):
July 2010 May 2010 doc.: IEEE /0503r4 doc.: IEEE /0415r0 March 2014 Straw Polls Straw poll 5: I support the following change (Y/N/A): Add following directly after the heading for Clause 17. “Use of Clause 17 is not recommended for data and management frames.” Result: Yes: 12, No:17 , Abstain: 11  Straw poll 6: I support the following change (Y/N/A): Add following directly after the heading for Clause 16 for data and management frames. “Use of Clause 16 is not recommended for data and management frames.” Slide 17 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Page 17 Sean Coffey, Realtek Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion

18 Motion 48 – Telecons Moved: Adrian Stephens Seconded: Jon Rosdahl
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 Motion 48 – Telecons Approve resolutions to comments in Tab “Motion MAC-U” Tabs “Gen Motion Telecon Feb ”, “Gen Motion Telecon Feb 28 ”, and “Gen Motion Telecon March 12 ” CIDs 2476, 2044 Moved: Adrian Stephens Seconded: Jon Rosdahl Result: passes Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

19 Motion 49 - Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday Comments
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 Motion 49 - Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday Comments Approve resolutions to comments in Tab “Motion MAC-V” Tab “Gen Motion Beijing A ” Tab “Editor” CID 2015 Moved: Jon Rosdahl Seconded: Mark Hamilton Result: Passes Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

20 Motion 50 – LCI comments Moved: Stephen McCann
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 Motion 50 – LCI comments Approve the resolutions to CIDs 2402, 2492, 2491 and as “Revised” Incorporate the text changes in and change from “The LCI configuration information report “ to “The LCI report” (last line P4) Moved: Stephen McCann Seconded: Adrian Stephens Result: Motion passes Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

21 Motion 51 – TXOP Moved: Stephen McCann Seconded: Graham Smith
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 Motion 51 – TXOP Approve the resolution to CID 2409 as “Revised” Incorporate the text changes in Moved: Stephen McCann Seconded: Graham Smith Result: Passes Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

22 July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 Motion – Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB199 on P802.11mc D2.0 Instruct the editor to prepare P802.11mc D3.0 incorporating these resolutions and Approve a 20 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11mc D3.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”   Moved: Seconded: Result: Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

23 Mar-May Meeting Planning
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 Mar-May Meeting Planning Objectives: Comment resolution Conference Calls 10am Eastern 2 hour April 4, 11, May 2: (Qos Map Set) CIDs 2463 and 2060 in r1 (Annex O) CID 2401 in , includes (Annex N) CID Graham “shall ignore” (PICS) Ad-Hoc meeting – none Schedule review Availability of 11mc in the IEEE store D2.0 is available; D3.0 after successful ballot Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks

24 July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0291r0 March 2014 References Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks Dorothy Stanley, Aruba Networks


Download ppt "IEEE TGmc March 2014 Agenda Date: Authors:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google