Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byOlavi Oksanen Modified over 5 years ago
1
Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?
Brajesh K Lal, MD, Robert W Hobson, MD, Jonathan Goldstein, MD, Elie Y Chakhtoura, MD, Walter N Durán, PhD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004) DOI: /j.jvs
2
Fig 1 Distribution of ultrasound velocity measurements with respect to corresponding degrees of angiographic stenosis noted after carotid artery stenting. A, In-stent peak systolic velocity (PSV). B, In-stent end-diastolic velocity (EDV). C, In-stent PSV/EDV ratio. D, In-stent PSV of internal carotid artery–common carotid artery ratio (ICA/CCA). Journal of Vascular Surgery , 58-66DOI: ( /j.jvs )
3
Fig 2 Receiver operator characteristics curves for various ultrasound velocity measurements for differentiating between ≥20% or <20% angiographic residual in-stent stenosis immediately after carotid stenting. A, In-stent peak systolic velocity (PSV; cm/s). B, In-stent end-diastolic velocity (EDV; cm/s). C, In-stent PSV/EDV ratio. D, In-stent PSV of internal carotid artery–common carotid artery ratio (ICA/CCA). Journal of Vascular Surgery , 58-66DOI: ( /j.jvs )
4
Fig 3 Measurement of elastic modulus (A) and compliance (B) of native distal internal carotid artery versus stented distal internal carotid artery; n = 20 for each measurement. CAS, Carotid artery stenting. Journal of Vascular Surgery , 58-66DOI: ( /j.jvs )
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.