Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
CHAPTER 6 POLITICAL ECONOMY
2
Direct Democracy-Unanimity Rules
0’ DrE Eve’s share (SE) S* box and labels 1st click – Adam’s D 2nd click – Eve’s D 3rh click – equilibrium r and S Adam’s share (SA) DrA r per year r* The Lindahl Model
3
Feasibility of Unanimity Rules
Reaching equilibrium Practical problems Strategic behavior time to reach equilibrium
4
Direct Democracy-Majority Voting Rules
Majority voting rule – one more than half of the voters must favor a measure for it to be approved Voter Choice Brad Jen Angelina First A C B Second Third
5
Direct Democracy-Majority Voting Rules
Voting Paradox – community preferences can be inconsistent even though individual’s preferences are consistent Agenda Manipulation – process of organizing order of votes to ensure a favorable outcome Cycling – when paired voting on more than two possibilities goes on indefinitely without a conclusion ever being reached Voter Choice Brad Jen Angelina First A C B Second Third
6
Graphing Preferences Single-peaked preferences Utility Jen
Double-peaked preferences axes and labels 1st click – Brad 2nd click – Jen 3rd click – Angelina 4th click – “Single-peaked preferences” and two arrows 5th click – “Double-peaked preferences” and curved arrow Brad Angelina A B C Missiles
7
Practical Importance of Double-peaked Preferences
Availability of private substitutes Issues ranked along single dimension
8
Direct Democracy - The Median Voter Theorem
Expenditure Donald $5 Daisy 100 Huey 150 Dewey 160 Louie 700
9
Direct Democracy - Logrolling I
Voter Project Melanie Rhett Scarlet Total Net Benefits Hospital 200 -50 -55 95 Library -40 150 -30 80 Pool -120 -60 400 220
10
Direct Democracy - Logrolling II
Voter Project Melanie Rhett Scarlet Total Net Benefits Hospital 200 -110 -105 -15 Library -40 150 -120 -10 Pool -270 -140 400 Melanie votes for library if Rhett votes for hospital; and Rhett and Scarlet trade votes for the pool and library
11
Direct Democracy - Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem
“Reasonable” collective decision-making criteria It can produce a decision whatever the configuration of voters' preferences It must be able to rank all possible outcomes It must be responsive to individuals’ preferences It must be consistent Independence of irrelevant alternatives Dictatorship ruled out Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem All conceivable voting schemes have some potential for being unfair or producing a paradoxical result Meaning of theorem consistent rule not necessarily impossible to find, but cannot be guaranteed Buchanan’s critique Use of social welfare functions Left box by 2nd level paragraphs Right box by 2nd level paragraphs
12
Representative Democracy - Elected Politicians
Representative Democracy - Elected Politicians Number of Voters Distribution and labels 1st click - Female politician locates on right 2nd click - Male politician locates directly to left of female 3rd click - female moves to left of male (but still to right of mean) 4th click - male politician moves just left of mean Liberal Conservative
13
Implications of the Median Voter Model
Two-party systems tend to be stable Replacement of direct referenda by representative system has no effect on outcomes
14
Other Factors Influencing Voting
Single-dimensional rankings Ideology Personality Leadership Decision to vote
15
Representative Democracy-Public Employees
Function of bureaucrats Goals of bureaucrats
16
Niskanen’s Model of Bureaucracy
$ V Axes and labels 1st click – V schedule 2nd click – C schedule 3rd click – two tangents, dashed line, Q* and “Efficient Output” tag 4th click – dashed line, Qbc, “Actual output” Actual output Efficient output Q* Qbc Q per year
17
Representative Democracy – Special Interests
What are “Special Interests” Establishment of Special Interest Groups Source of Income: Capital or Labor Size of Income Source of Income: Industry of Employment Region Demographic and Personal Characteristics
18
Representative Democracy – Rent-Seeking
$ Rents Axes, labels, D, MR, and S=MC 1st click - rents S=MC D tons of peanuts per year MR
19
Representative Democracy – Other Actors
Judiciary Journalists Experts
20
Explaining Government Growth
Citizen Preferences G = f(P, I) Marxist View Chance Events Changes in Social Attitudes Income Redistribution
21
Controlling Government Growth
Government growth as a non-issue Government growth as a problem Commitments made in the past Basic flaws in the political system
22
Improving the Workings of the Political System
Change bureaucratic incentives financial incentives privatization Change Fiscal Institutions Budget Enforcement Act (BEA) – 1990 Balanced budget rules at the state level Institute Constitutional Limitations Balanced budget amendment
23
Provisions of a Typical Balanced Budget Amendment
Congress must adopt a budget statement “in which total outlays are no greater than total receipts” Total receipts may not increase “by a rate greater than the rate of increase in national income” “The Congress and President shall…ensure that actual outlays do not exceed the outlays set forth in the budget statement” The provisions can be overridden in times of war
24
Critique of Balanced Budget Amendments
Forecasting issues Definitional issues Penalties for violation of the law Economic issues
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.