Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Comparison of traditional RPE with two types of micro-implant assisted RPE: CBCT study
Heesoo Oh, Joorok Park, Manuel O. Lagravere-Vich Seminars in Orthodontics Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (March 2019) DOI: /j.sodo Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
2
Figure 1. Three different maxillary expansion appliances. A. Conventional tooth-anchored maxillary expander (TAME), B. Bone-anchored maxillary expander (BAME), C. Tooth-bone anchored expander (MSE). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) Seminars in Orthodontics , 60-68DOI: ( /j.sodo ) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
3
Figure 2. Skeletal and dental measurements.
Seminars in Orthodontics , 60-68DOI: ( /j.sodo ) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
4
Figure 3. Effect of expansion on various areas in the MSE group.
Seminars in Orthodontics , 60-68DOI: ( /j.sodo ) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
5
Figure 4. Palatal opening. Examples of CBCT images of the three different maxillary expansion groups at T2. A. BAME group; B. TAME group; C. MSE group. Seminars in Orthodontics , 60-68DOI: ( /j.sodo ) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.