Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDarcy Peters Modified over 5 years ago
1
Better Short-Term Outcome by Using Sutureless Valves: A Propensity-Matched Score Analysis
Francesco Pollari, MD, Giuseppe Santarpino, MD, Angelo Maria Dell'Aquila, MD, Laszlo Gazdag, MD, Husam Alnahas, MD, Ferdinand Vogt, MD, Steffen Pfeiffer, MD, Theodor Fischlein, MD The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014) DOI: /j.athoracsur Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 (A) Perceval (Sorin Group, Saluggia, Italy) sutureless aortic valve prosthesis. (B) A Perceval prosthesis collapsed and inserted in its holder. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 Survival function at follow-up (F.up) is shown in the sutureless group (blue) and in the stented group (green). (Cum = cumulative.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions
4
Fig 3 Cost analysis in propensity-matched groups. Costs are expressed for diagnostic, radiology, and laboratory (green bars); hospital stay (intensive care unit [ICU] and normal ward (red bars); and for the operating room ([OR] including anesthesia; blue bars) in euros (€); exchange rate: €1 = $1.358 on January 19, 2014). The graphic shows a total cost saving of €4,407 per patient for operations with the sutureless device (excluding costs of prostheses from both groups). The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.