Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1. Human rights abuses by UN peacekeepers, 2000–2010 Note: Left panel shows abuses aggregated by country. Right ... Figure 1. Human rights abuses.

Published byἸάκωβος Αντωνιάδης Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1. Human rights abuses by UN peacekeepers, 2000–2010 Note: Left panel shows abuses aggregated by country. Right ... Figure 1. Human rights abuses."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1. Human rights abuses by UN peacekeepers, 2000–2010 Note: Left panel shows abuses aggregated by country. Right ... Figure 1. Human rights abuses by UN peacekeepers, 2000–2010 Note: Left panel shows abuses aggregated by country. Right panel shows abuses aggregated by peacekeeping mission. Vertical axis is number of unique abuse events. Data source described below. See supplementary information for acronyms. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Int Stud Q, sqz020, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

2 Figure 2. Predictive margins, institutional model Note: Figures illustrate predicted outcome of increasing specified ... Figure 2. Predictive margins, institutional model Note: Figures illustrate predicted outcome of increasing specified variable from tenth to ninetieth decile, holding dichotomous variables at their medians and all others at their means. Lines are point estimates. Polygons are 95 percent confidence intervals. Note that y-axis scales differ across panels. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Int Stud Q, sqz020, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

3 Figure 3. Predictive margins, societal model Note: Figures illustrate predicted outcome of increasing specified ... Figure 3. Predictive margins, societal model Note: Figures illustrate predicted outcome of increasing specified variable from tenth to ninetieth decile, holding dichotomous variables at their medians and all others at their means. Lines are point estimates. Polygons are 95 percent confidence intervals. Note that y-axis scales differ across panels. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Int Stud Q, sqz020, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

4 Figure 4. Predictive margins, military culture model Note: Figures illustrate predicted outcome of increasing specified ... Figure 4. Predictive margins, military culture model Note: Figures illustrate predicted outcome of increasing specified variable from tenth to ninetieth decile, holding dichotomous variables at their medians and all others at their means. Lines are point estimates. Polygons are 95 percent confidence intervals. Note that y-axis scales differ across panels. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Int Stud Q, sqz020, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

5 Figure 5. Predicting human rights abuses in hypothetical missions Note: Bar heights indicate predicted number of ... Figure 5. Predicting human rights abuses in hypothetical missions Note: Bar heights indicate predicted number of abuses, based on Model 4. “Best case,” “worst case,” and “average case” scenarios refer to values of contributing country variables. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Int Stud Q, sqz020, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

6 Figure 6. Predicting abuses in a hypothetical Turkey mission Note: In left panel, bar heights indicate predicted number ... Figure 6. Predicting abuses in a hypothetical Turkey mission Note: In left panel, bar heights indicate predicted number of abuses, based on Model 4, using “worst case” values for contributing country variables. In right panel, lines show percentage deviations in press freedoms and rule of law from 2002 levels. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Int Stud Q, sqz020, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

7 Figure 7. Predicting abuses in a hypothetical Colombia mission Note: In left panel, bar heights indicate predicted ... Figure 7. Predicting abuses in a hypothetical Colombia mission Note: In left panel, bar heights indicate predicted number of abuses, based on Model 4, using “worst case” values for contributing country variables. In right panel, lines show percentage deviations in press freedoms and rule of law from 2002 levels. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association.This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Int Stud Q, sqz020, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Download ppt "Figure 1. Human rights abuses by UN peacekeepers, 2000–2010 Note: Left panel shows abuses aggregated by country. Right ... Figure 1. Human rights abuses."

Similar presentations

Figure 1. Bar plots of age-standardized (world population) death rates per 100 000 persons for the year 2014 (blue, ... Figure 1. Bar plots of age-standardized.

Figure 1. Bar plots of age-standardized (world population) death rates per 100 000 persons for the year 2014 (blue, ... Figure 1. Bar plots of age-standardized.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 3 Doctors leaving (Matthews, 2013, p.13.)

Figure 3 Doctors leaving (Matthews, 2013, p.13.)
Figure 1 Data-selection process

Figure 1 Data-selection process
Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.
Figure 1 Multivariable-adjusted predictors of PAC

Figure 1 Multivariable-adjusted predictors of PAC
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access
Figure 1 Qualitative analysis—themes and subthemes regarding detention minimisation Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1 Qualitative analysis—themes and subthemes regarding detention minimisation Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1. Medicaid receipt and ACA favorability

Figure 1. Medicaid receipt and ACA favorability
Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.

Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.
Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the early career (with 95 per cent confidence intervals) Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the.

Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the early career (with 95 per cent confidence intervals) Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the.
Figure 1 Phases of the research. Author’s own work.

Figure 1 Phases of the research. Author’s own work.
Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (solid line) for incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a ... Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted.

Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (solid line) for incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a ... Figure 1. Multivariable-adjusted.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1. Comparison of weighted estimates of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five by country between PMA2020 ... Figure 1. Comparison of weighted.

Figure 1. Comparison of weighted estimates of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five by country between PMA Figure 1. Comparison of weighted.
Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.

Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.
Source: Figure created by the author based on data ...

Source: Figure created by the author based on data ...

Similar presentations

Ads by Google