Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparison of CMR and echocardiography in aortic regurgitation.

Published byGábor Kiss Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Comparison of CMR and echocardiography in aortic regurgitation."— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparison of CMR and echocardiography in aortic regurgitation.
Comparison of CMR and echocardiography in aortic regurgitation. In 109 asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe aortic regurgitation on echocardiography, prognosis was better related to the regurgitant fraction on CMR with a cut-point of 33%.The graph shows CMR regurgitant fraction ≤ 33% in blue and >33% in red. The regurgitation was either moderate or severe by echocardiography in both of these two CMR groups. John B Chambers et al. Open Heart 2016;3:e000330 ©2016 by British Cardiovascular Society

Download ppt "Comparison of CMR and echocardiography in aortic regurgitation."

Similar presentations

Heart valve disease in general practice: a clinical overview by Jessica Webb, Chris Arden, and John B Chambers BJGP Volume 65(632):e204-e206 March 2, 2015.

Heart valve disease in general practice: a clinical overview by Jessica Webb, Chris Arden, and John B Chambers BJGP Volume 65(632):e204-e206 March 2, 2015.
Comparison between Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of Bristol aortic valve surgery patients and the Monte Carlo-based generated Kaplan-Meier curve using.

Comparison between Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of Bristol aortic valve surgery patients and the Monte Carlo-based generated Kaplan-Meier curve using.
Comparison between Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of Bristol aortic valve surgery patients and the Monte Carlo-based generated Kaplan-Meier curve using.

Comparison between Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of Bristol aortic valve surgery patients and the Monte Carlo-based generated Kaplan-Meier curve using.
An example adjunctive CT imaging in the management of aortic valve replacement dysfunction. An example adjunctive CT imaging in the management of aortic.

An example adjunctive CT imaging in the management of aortic valve replacement dysfunction. An example adjunctive CT imaging in the management of aortic.
Echocardiography view

Echocardiography view
Ao, aorta; AR, aortic regurgitation; CFD, color-flow Doppler; LV, left ventricle; LV EDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; PW, pulse-wave; SBP,

Ao, aorta; AR, aortic regurgitation; CFD, color-flow Doppler; LV, left ventricle; LV EDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; PW, pulse-wave; SBP,
Figure 2 A patient with aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation

Figure 2 A patient with aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation
(A–C) Sequential angiographic images demonstrating placement of the wire, using the retrograde technique in the LV cavity (A), followed by balloon placement.

(A–C) Sequential angiographic images demonstrating placement of the wire, using the retrograde technique in the LV cavity (A), followed by balloon placement.
Change in symptoms in operated and unoperated patients 1 year following evaluation of surgical AVR. Pie charts display change from baseline to follow-up.

Change in symptoms in operated and unoperated patients 1 year following evaluation of surgical AVR. Pie charts display change from baseline to follow-up.
Suggested pathway for assessment of aortic valve replacement dysfunction. Suggested pathway for assessment of aortic valve replacement dysfunction. Transthoracic.

Suggested pathway for assessment of aortic valve replacement dysfunction. Suggested pathway for assessment of aortic valve replacement dysfunction. Transthoracic.
The effect of GOODCOLL versus POORCOLL on LVEF, LVEDV and scar at 4 months. The effect of GOODCOLL versus POORCOLL on LVEF, LVEDV and scar at 4 months.

The effect of GOODCOLL versus POORCOLL on LVEF, LVEDV and scar at 4 months. The effect of GOODCOLL versus POORCOLL on LVEF, LVEDV and scar at 4 months.
Forest plot of risk ratio with its 95% CI for the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy among patient taking statin versus control based on renal impairment.

Forest plot of risk ratio with its 95% CI for the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy among patient taking statin versus control based on renal impairment.
Heart valve disease in general practice: a clinical overview

Heart valve disease in general practice: a clinical overview
Masashi Maeda et al. Heart Asia 2013;5:7-14

Masashi Maeda et al. Heart Asia 2013;5:7-14
Comparison of the age-associated prevalence (y axis) in the Catalan Healthcare Surveillance System (CHSS) and Medicare datasets of selected disease groups.

Comparison of the age-associated prevalence (y axis) in the Catalan Healthcare Surveillance System (CHSS) and Medicare datasets of selected disease groups.
Metoprolol for AR Trial design: Patients with chronic asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation (AR) were randomized to metoprolol CR/XL 200 mg or matching.

Metoprolol for AR Trial design: Patients with chronic asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation (AR) were randomized to metoprolol CR/XL 200 mg or matching.
(A) Kaplan-Meier curve showing AF-free survival after a single procedure for patients grouped according to use of CT integration. (A) Kaplan-Meier curve.

(A) Kaplan-Meier curve showing AF-free survival after a single procedure for patients grouped according to use of CT integration. (A) Kaplan-Meier curve.
Intramural segment with no ischaemia in a patient with an intramural segment of an AAORCA (A and B, asterix), there is normal rest and stress perfusion.

Intramural segment with no ischaemia in a patient with an intramural segment of an AAORCA (A and B, asterix), there is normal rest and stress perfusion.
Receiver operating characteristic curves for the association of primary outcome using each clinical risk score and each clinical risk score adjusted for.

Receiver operating characteristic curves for the association of primary outcome using each clinical risk score and each clinical risk score adjusted for.
Time course of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular diastolic dimension (LVDd) in 13 patients with the development.

Time course of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular diastolic dimension (LVDd) in 13 patients with the development.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google