1. In Vivo Differentiation Potential of Epiblast Stem Cells Revealed by Chimeric Embryo Formation 
Yali Huang, Rodrigo Osorno, Anestis Tsakiridis, Valerie Wilson 
Cell Reports 
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
DOI: /j.celrep
Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

2. Cell Reports 2012 2, 1571-1578DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.022)
Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 1
Grafting Procedure and Analysis of Cell Contribution to Cultured Embryos
(A) Diagram of late-streak embryo, showing graft sites (MA, D, MP, and PP) in the egg cylinder.
(B and C) GFP-labeled cells (green) overlaid on a brightfield or DAPI-counterstained image (C, inset).
(B) Embryo-derived EpiSC (r04-GFP) grafted to the D region of a late-streak-stage embryo.
(C) Confocal z-stack showing a mid-streak-stage embryo with C2 in-vitro-derived EpiSC in the MP region. Inset: confocal z-slice showing individual grafted cells.
(D–F) Examples of cell contribution to embryos grafted at indicated sites (lower right of each panel) after culture. Culture period: 24 hr, except for lower right in (D), when it was 48 hr.
(D) Embryos with different numbers of dispersed embryo-derived EpiSCs.
(E) Embryos with different extents of embryo-derived EpiSC cell spread along the anteroposterior axis.
(F) Embryos grafted with ESCs (AGFP7).
(G–I) Histograms showing the percentage of embryos for each category of graft containing different numbers of dispersed donor cells and extents of cell spread. The percentage of bona fide chimeras is shown at the right. Note: cells grafted to the D site of four embryos cultured for 48 hr were located internally and consequently only the extent of spread, not the number of dispersed cells, was scored.
See also Figure S1.
Cell Reports 2012 2, DOI: ( /j.celrep )
Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 2 Analysis of Donor Cell Differentiation in Chimeras
(A) Schematic diagrams showing approximate sectioning planes in embryos cultured for 24 hr (left) or 48 hr (right).
(B–J and L–P) Specific stains (red/cyan). Insets: position of graft-derived cells with channels removed to allow comparison of graft-derived (green) and host (gray, DAPI counterstain) cells. Arrowheads: donor cells showing correct marker expression.
(B–L) EpiSC grafts.
(B) Phalloidin, showing donor cells in the neural groove and mesoderm.
(C) T (brachyury), showing donor cells in the primitive streak and paraxial mesoderm.
(D) Tbx6, showing donor cells in the paraxial presomitic mesoderm.
(E) Sox2 (red) and AP-2a (cyan) of embryo in (D), showing donor cells in the neural tube and surface ectoderm. Asterisk: single cell ectopically expressing Sox2.
(F and G) Foxa2, showing donor cells in the floor plate (F) and endoderm (G).
(H) Cdx2 staining on the embryo in (D), showing donor cells in allantois.
(I) Frontal view of a 48-hr-cultured, early-streak-stage embryo grafted in the PP region with in-vitro-derived EpiSC. Inset: position of section J in this embryo. n, neurectoderm; h, heart; g, gut.
(J) Nkx2.5 staining of embryo shown in (I), showing donor cells in the embryonic heart.
(K) Alkaline phosphatase (AP) (red) and GFP immunohistochemistry (gray), showing PGC differentiation. Inset: TNAP staining prior to immunohistochemistry. Arrowheads: TNAP+, GFP+ cells with PGC morphology.
(L) Stella staining, showing PGC differentiation. Insets: removal of either the green (GFP) or red (Stella) channel.
(M–P) ESC grafts.
(M and N) Donor cells ectopically express Sox2 (M) and (N) Oct4. Inset: nuclear stain removed.
(O) Foxa2, showing expression only in host-derived cells. Diamonds: GFP-labeled cells.
(P) Cdx2 staining of embryo in M and N, showing donor cells in allantois. A single cell (arrowhead) correctly expresses Cdx2. Left inset: Cdx2 immunofluorescence. White lines outline the position of donor cells. Right inset: donor cells.
See also Figure S2.
Cell Reports 2012 2, DOI: ( /j.celrep )
Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 3 EpiSC Grafted in E8.5 Embryos
(A and B) Grayscale, brightfield images. (A) Representative E8.5 embryo receiving a graft of embryo-derived EpiSC in the NSB. (B) Aggregated donor cells in the recipient embryo after 48 hr. Inset: whole embryo. White line: plane of transverse sections (C–H).
(C–H) DAPI-counterstained images. Immunofluorescence (C–E) and phalloidin staining (F) show unincorporated cell clumps. Distinct clumps beneath the neural tube express Foxa2 (D) but not T (E). (G) Phalloidin staining shows dispersed donor cells in the mesoderm. The boundary of the dorsal aorta (containing highly autofluorescent circulatory blood cells) is indicated by a hand-drawn white line. (H) One Foxa2-expressing donor cell (arrowhead) is present in the notochord. Inset: green (GFP) channel removed.
See also Figure S4.
Cell Reports 2012 2, DOI: ( /j.celrep )
Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

6. Figure S1
EpiSCs and ESCs in Host Embryos after Culture, Related to Figure 1
(A and B) GFP channel (A) and brightfield (B) overlay (B) of in-vitro-derived EpiSC (C2) grafted to the PP region of an early-streak-stage embryo after 48 hr culture.
(C and D) GFP channel (C) and brightfield (D) overlay of embryo-derived EpiSC (r04-GFP) grafted to the PP region of an early-streak-stage embryo after 48 hr culture.
(E) List of all grafted embryos represented in Figure 1, broken down by donor cell type, graft sites, and embryo culture time. Yellow highlight: ≥50% of embryos fall in the category indicated. Gray type: embryos considered not to be bona fide chimeras. Note that cells grafted to the distal site of four embryos cultured for 48 hr (brackets) were located internally and consequently only the extent of spread, not the number of dispersed cells, was scored.
Cell Reports 2012 2, DOI: ( /j.celrep )
Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

7. Figure S2
Expression of Markers in EpiSCs, ESCs, and Embryos, Related to Figure 2
(A) Widespread Sox2 expression (green) in in-vitro-derived EpiSC.
(B) Sox2 immunohistochemistry (red) on a transverse section (embryo-derived EpiSC grafted into the PP region). Sox2 is expressed in the anterior neurectoderm but not in the primitive streak. Donor cells (green) do not ectopically express Sox2.
(C–G) T (C), Foxa2 (D), Cdx2 (E), AP-2α, and Nkx2.5 (G) immunofluorescence in in-vitro-derived EpiSCs. Insets show high-magnification views of regions of immunopositive cells.
(H) Stella expression (red) in TNG (Nanog:GFP) ESCs.
(I) Stella staining (red) on a transverse section of an E8.5 Nanog:GFP embryo, showing PGCs coexpressing Nanog and Stella. Inset: removal of the red channel (Stella).
(J) Stella staining on a transverse section (MP graft of embryo-derived EpiSC), showing Stella-negative donor cells in the allantois.
Cell Reports 2012 2, DOI: ( /j.celrep )
Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

8. Figure S3
Comparison of EpiSC Tissue Colonization with a Fate Map, Related to Table 1
(A) Fate map of an early-streak-stage epiblast. Note that comprehensive fate maps were not produced specifically for the mid-streak-stage embryo.
(B) Fate map of a late-streak-stage epiblast. The tissues colonized by EpiSC embryos are shown next to the graft sites at the appropriate stage. Text colors match the color key for the fate maps. Dashed lines indicate domains of predominant fate, rather than absolute lineage boundaries. The fate maps are adapted from Tam and Behringer (1997).
Cell Reports 2012 2, DOI: ( /j.celrep )
Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

9. Figure S4 Analysis of Unincorporated Cell Clumps, Related to Figure 3
(A) Sox2 immunofluorescence (red) on a transverse section of an embryo grafted with a larger number of embryo-derived EpiSC (>12 cells/embryo) in the PP region. GFP labeled cells are present in the posterior primitive streak, where no Sox2 expression is detectable in the host. Whereas dispersed cells have downregulated Sox2 expression, weak expression is detected in clustered GFP-labeled cells. White lines in the right inset, where the green channel is removed, show the position of donor cells.
(B) Frontal section showing an unincorporated clump in an embryo that received an ESC graft in the D region.
(C and D) Examples of embryos grafted with TßC44Cre6 ESCs (Nanog:GFP) after 24 hr culture. Cell clumps in the graft site, as well as some dispersed cells, show ectopic GFP expression, indicating failure to downregulate Nanog:GFP. The graft site for each embryo is shown in the lower-right corner.
(E) Donor (GFP+) cells in a recipient embryo after 24 hr (embryo-derived EpiSC grafted in NSB at E8.5).
(F) Transverse section of the same embryo, showing a small cluster of unincorporated donor cells ventral to the neural tube. Inset: brightfield only. The position of GFP-labeled donor cells is indicated by an arrow.
Cell Reports 2012 2, DOI: ( /j.celrep )
Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions