Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ME Session #6 More PDS / Materials / Bad designs

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ME Session #6 More PDS / Materials / Bad designs"— Presentation transcript:

1 ME 437 - Session #6 More PDS / Materials / Bad designs
PDS due on Monday Stay with the suggested format Cover all items - Use NA, Not known, or None when applicable Patent search sites: Patent Number: D (Darren!?) More PDS / Materials / Bad designs

2 ME 437 - Session #6 Auto bike rack Home bike rack Cat/Dog Feeder
Eric & Merrily Dave & Serin Mark & Kareem Home bike rack Werner & Albert Scott, Jim, Darren Mahesh & Chan Cat/Dog Feeder Clint & Brett Tony & Bruce Jim & Jeff Dana Tavis Envelope Shane & Bill Ceicel, Ben, Brial

3 Project Timetable

4 Deliverables Conceptual designs Include at least 3 different ideas.
Avoid close variations as much as possible. Each concept should be clearly shown. Use hand-drawn orthographic-like drawings with correct proportions. Show details on separate pages if necessary. Number each major component of the assembly Motor, electronic control box, gear box

5 Conceptual Designs

6 Deliverables Final Report Includes Final PDS Final design description
Assembly drawing. A description of each component in the assembly: Drawings of designed components. Complete description of off-the-shelf components including model and brand. Instructions for product assembly. Operations, maintenance, and safety manuals.

7 Final Report Final Design Supporting information
Other conceptual designs considered. Decision methods used. All major decisions made and reasons for them. Relate decisions to PDS Include cost and manufacturing concerns Areas where possible improvements can be made.

8 Materail Selection Plain carbon steels have very poor hardenability.
Cold finished steels (1006 to 1050) can come in various tempers (hard to skin rolled). They can be strengthened up to 100% with cold working. Cold finished parts are stronger, have better surface finish, are more dimensionally accurate. But, they have less ductility, cost more, are dimensionally less stable in machining, and loose their strength if welded. High sulfur steels are ideal for machining (AISI 1112) as the chips break up easily. High sulfur content, however, causes weld cracking.

9 Material Selection Alloy steels
AISI 4340 or 4140 (Through hardening grades): Have excellent strength and toughness. Available in most forms in hot rolled form. Designed for high hardenability. Best suited to high stress machine parts - gears, cams, shafting, piston rods, bolts, dies, keys, bending rolls. They can be finish machined but can not be easily welded without special precautions. AISI 8620 or 9310 (carburizing grades): These steels are designed for case hardening requirements. Deep cases can be created and hardened using carburizing. Used when high wear resistance is required. Suitable for gears, racks, cams, and sliding surfaces.

10 Alloy Steels High Strength Low Alloy Steels (HSLA)
Used for Structural applications Stronger than plain carbon steels Not heat treatable Corrosion resistant (not as much as stainless steel) Good weldability (low carbon content) Good formability Applications: structural forms, bars, plates. ASTM A36 (most popular), A242

11 Alloy Steels Ultra-strength steels
High strength and reasonable toughness. Used for heavily loaded machine parts. 4340 and 4140 are most common Hard to weld but machinable 18% nickel maraging steel Very high strength ( ksi) Good weldability Very expensive

12 Example Suppose a designer has created a drawing for a shaft of a hypothetical device. The list of operational conditions have been determined as follows: 1.25” diameters are to fit ball bearings The shaft is subjected to maximum shear stress of 10 ksi There is possibility of moderate shock load Small end must resist damage from frequent removal of a keyed gear. There are no inertial requirements. Surface roughness to be 32 micro inches max. Diameters must be concentric to inch.

13 Example Based on the operational requirements, time constraint, and cost, the following selection factors have been established: Hardness of at least 30 HRC (285 HB) Fatigue strength of 30 ksi Impact strength must be high Stiffness must be high The part must not rust in 50% RH room air. Must be dimensionally stable. Parts are needed in one week. Three units are required. Expected service life is 5 years

14 Example [From Budinski]

15 Solution ideas What kind of material Must be hardenable to 30 HRC
Metal? Plastic? Low stiffness Ceramic? Low impact strength Composites? Must be hardenable to 30 HRC Hardenable steels 1050 or 4340/4140 High fatigue strength AISI 4340 or 4140 Must be surface treated (nickel plating)

16 Cast Irons Grey cast iron (ASTM A 48 grades 20-60)
Easy to cast (excellent fluidity) Low cost Low toughness, brittle, no shock resistance High compressive strength Not appropriate for parts stresses in tension. Low to medium tensile strength Excellent machinability Superb vibration damping property Not easily weldable Low stiffness (30 to 60% of steel)

17 Cast Irons Gray cast iron Ductile iron (ASTM 536, grade 5 [60-40-18])
Excellent metal-on-metal wear resistance Good corrosion resistance in all media Ductile iron (ASTM 536, grade 5 [ ]) Easy to cast/Low cost. Much better toughness than gray iron. Stiffness is about 70% of steel Yield strengths range from 40 o 90 ksi Similar to gray cast iron in other properties

18 Aluminum Alloys General properties Lightness: 1/3 of steel
Good thermal and electrical conductivity High strength/weight ratio Weldable (most alloys) Atmospheric corrosion resistance (will not rust) Excellent machinability Can be die case Good formability Non-magnetic Non-toxic (pots and pans - 25% of all usage)


Download ppt "ME Session #6 More PDS / Materials / Bad designs"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google