Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
US Kickoff brief to Frameworks Convergence Meeting
Mr. Walt Okon 19 June 2012
2
Briefing Outline Overall architecture framework convergence vision
Current U.S. convergence initiatives Change in structure and contents of DoDAF v2.03 U.S. Federal Government Common Approach to Federal Enterprise Architecture Next -- NATO Architecture Capability Team (Architecture CaT) Architecture CaT Understanding Approach for UAF – IDEAS, Common metamodel supporting multiple policies Ideas for Architecture CaT Workshop Objectives, Invitees, and Agenda 19 June 2012 2
3
Overall architecture framework convergence vision
DoDAF v1.5 1995 C4ISR F/W v1.0 v2.0 UAF v2.05 2003 2007 JCIDS & NR-KPP Applicability beyond C4ISR Use-based Integrated Architecture 2009 2010 2012 2014 v2.01 v2.02 v2.03 DoDAF/DNDAF v2.04 1997 2016 2013 Joint Interoperability DoDAF v1.0 C4ISR F/W v2.0 Net-centricity and SoA SvcV views 26 AV/OV/SV/TV views Linked to I&S policies CADM 2.0 Fit-for-purpose Data-centric architecture Improved models of systems, services, capabilities, rules, measures DoDAF Meta Model (DM2) based on IDEAS Urgent CRs 52 1 XSD IDEAS Foundation v1.0 fixes TECHEDITS DM2 OWL Federal Common Approach DNDAF Security Views MODEM – DM2 Harmonization (IDEAS Domain Level) NATO NAF UDAF Standardization, e.g., ISO OMG OASIS Framework Objective: Achieve a single integrated Architecture Framework for interoperability. Achieve a US, Canada, and United Kingdom single Framework with a common Data Meta Model Achieve alignment with the US Government Common Approach to Enterprise Architecture 19 June 2012 3 3
4
U.S. perceived benefits of a Unified Architecture Framework
Architecture federation and data exchange Agreement on common concepts and meanings Architectures can be assessed for interoperability and for capability gaps and overlaps in support of Coalition operations long-range planning Defense, humanitarian, law enforcement, … Standardization Tools Training 19 June 2012
5
Enabler – Revised Structure and contents of DoDAF v2.03
Vol. I - Normative DM2 Conceptual Data Model (CDM) documentation DoDAF Viewpoints & Models Vol. II - Normative DM2 Logical Data Model (LDM) documentation DoDAF Model Specs DoDAF Glossary Vol. III - Normative IDEAS documentation DM2 Physical Exchange Specification (PES) documentation DM2 OWL-DL documentation In the DoD MDR “ARCH” namespace supporting the DoD EA COI - Normative Links to IDEAS Foundation v1.0 SparxEA .EAP DM2 LDM file DM2 PES XSD file DM2 OWL-DL file Vol IV - Informative DoDAF Informative material (e.g., history of the DoDAF, 6-step, approximately 30 articles) NOT under formal CM 19 June 2012
6
Enabler – Layers to Separate Evolving Policies from Enduring Architectural Concepts
DoDAF Models Operational Capabilities Services Systems Data and Information Standards Projects DM2 The 52 DoDAF models use the DM2 concepts 19 June 2012
7
Convergence in the US -- Common Approach
Documentation section identifies 50 artifacts, what DoDAF calls models DoD led the Artifact Working Group that is updating these artifacts 19 June 2012
8
Draft Artifacts 19 June 2012
9
Draft Artifacts 19 June 2012 9
10
19 June 2012
11
Vision and Near-Term Activities
“…committed on delivering key architectural products to support the federated C3 EA development as key governance tool for the achievement of NATO's Strategic Concept goals.” Who: 16 countries + several NATO organizations in roster Upcoming activities: Architecture CaT Workshop NATO HQ Architecture CaT Meeting # 4 12 Sept at NATO HQ 19 June 2012
12
Architecture CaT Current Work Plan
“Propose the structure and develop the content of the guiding framework for the development of a federated NATO C3 Enterprise Architecture, reusing national and NATO artefacts.” “Nations are requested - in the context of the C3 Classification Taxonomy - to provide by the next CaT Meeting their key concepts for enterprise architecture, including definitions of terms; …” “[Task 01] Harmonize and modernize Architecture Governance & Policy Documents” “[Task 02] Assess NAF vs. TOGAF and make recommendation to C3 Board for (board action)” 19 June 2012
13
IDEAS Layered Approach
1. Foundation (upper ontology) Ontologic concepts and relationships Commonly used patterns, e.g., Resource Flow, Exchange Universally accepted concepts and relationships, e.g., person, organization, material, etc. 2. Common patterns 3. Universal objects & relationships X X X X Reports drawn from the architecture data specific to needs and policies of individual nations national views national views national views national views 19 June 2012 13
14
Workshop Our Objectives Invitees – entire roster?
For the two days Related to Architecture CaT work plan Long term (UAF?) Invitees – entire roster? Our Roles and Responsibilities to prepare and conduct workshop Briefings Facilitation Communications Read-ahead materials Finalization of agenda 19 June 2012
15
Agenda Ideas Review objectives with attendees Introduction to IDEAS
IDEAS Role in DoDAF and MODAF IDEAS Support for Architecture Federation IDEAS Relationship to Current Architecture CaT Activities, e.g., C3 Taxonomy IDEAS Compared to NAF and TOGAF Plan to Complete IDEAS as a NATO Architecture Foundation IDEAS Foundation, v1.0 (done) Common Patterns (work to be done) Universal Objects and Relationships (work to be done) 19 June 2012
16
Notional Plan for Common Patterns and Universal Objects and Relationships
(Dates are indicative of work needs, not resource commitments. Note: There is work effort to socialize DM2 changes to US DM2 user base.) 19 June 2012
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.