1. Erratum to “Reconstructed three-dimensional MR images: application to simulated tibial plateau depression fractures” [Radiography 10 (2) (2004) 95–101] 
Andrew P. Kurmis, John P. Slavotinek 
Radiography 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
DOI: /j.radi
Copyright © 2004 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 2
Perspex spacing sheets [top sheet outlined with dotted line] (a) with separated condylar fragments; and (b) showing fragments in position prior to MR imaging.
Radiography  , DOI: ( /j.radi )
Copyright © 2004 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 3
Schematic representation of proximal tibia showing resected fragments (A and B), perpendicular scan blocks (parallel lines) and perspex spacing sheets (C).
Radiography  , DOI: ( /j.radi )
Copyright © 2004 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 4
A magnified static representation of the proximal tibia showing displacement of resected fragment A and the corresponding perspex spacer (C). The depression of the fracture fragment was measured as indicated (arrows).
Radiography  , DOI: ( /j.radi )
Copyright © 2004 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions