1. SANCTION DETECTION PERFORMANCE
Agenda Item No. 6b
SANCTION DETECTION PERFORMANCE
Dr. Richard Bullock

2. SETTING THE SCENE

3. SANCTION DETECTION OVERVIEW CHART
Peer Review
Improving but Non Significant

4. SOUTH & WEST DEVON PERFORMANCE

5. TARGET 5: To achieve a minimum sanction detection rate of 22
TARGET 5: To achieve a minimum sanction detection rate of 22.1% for total crime

6. NATIONAL POSITION IN SANCTION DETECTION

7. NATIONAL POSITION IN % CHANGE IN SANCTION DETECTION

8. TYPES OF SANCTION DETECTION

9. Sanction Detection Rate Domestic Burglary

10. NATIONAL POSITION IN BURGLARY SANCTION DETECTION

11. Sanction Detection Rate Violent Crime

12. NATIONAL POSITION IN VIOLENCE SANCTION DETECTION

13. Sanction Detection Rate Vehicle Crime

14. NATIONAL POSITION IN VEHICLE SANCTION DETECTION

15. SANCTION DETECTION WORK GROUP
PSU Best Practice Matrix:
Processes
People
Partnerships
Policy
Performance Review
Identification of Good/Poor Working Practices
Audit Reviews

16. OTHER AREAS OF WORK
PIP (Professionalising Investigation Process)
Enhanced Charging
Forensic Review
Crime Hatpegs
Cambourne Performance Review

17. OUTCOME
TARGET 4: To increase the number of offences brought to justice by a minimum of 16.8%.

19. NATIONAL POSITION IN PERCENT OF CRIME BTJ