Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

TGn Editor Report Oct 2006 Date: Authors: October 2006

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "TGn Editor Report Oct 2006 Date: Authors: October 2006"— Presentation transcript:

1 TGn Editor Report Oct 2006 Date: 2006-10-17 Authors: October 2006
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 October 2006 TGn Editor Report Oct 2006 Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation John Doe, Some Company

2 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 October 2006 Abstract This document contains a summary of the editorial response to the comment approved in the September TGn session, plus showing the current status of the comment resolution database and plans for draft releases through November. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation John Doe, Some Company

3 Status of the editorial work
October 2006 Status of the editorial work Resolution of comments approved in September See “approved” tab of 11-06/0706r18 The “R” comments were moved into the “no edit required” bucket, so they disappear off the subsequent statistics Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

4 Reminder – Edit Status Codes
October 2006 Reminder – Edit Status Codes Non-recycled EI – edit as resolution EM – edit with minor changes, editor happy that he understood the intent and introduced no technical changes EN – nothing to do – covered by another resolution Recycled EMR – edit with changes. Editor not happy that he fully understood the instructions, or that he introduced no technical change. ER – editor cannot implement the comment – either because he doesn’t understand it, or because it contradicts some other comment. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

5 October 2006 Edit Status for September Approved Comments (see “Edited in D1_05” tab) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

6 Planned sequence of drafts + d1.05 review
October 2006 Planned sequence of drafts + d1.05 review D1.05 (redline insertions only) & matching 11-06/0706r19 – done Editorial Review of D1.05 to finish at the end of next week Scope is to report defects in the editing, or inconsistencies with the spreadsheet Scope is *not* to report defects previously edited, or disagree with approved resolutions, or bring new comments. Expect a D1.06 to be published a week later Will call for defects during the Nov TGn session, and also wrap in any adjustments to EMR comment resolutions, so expect a D1.07 to be issued at the end of the November meeting for approval by TGn. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

7 Components of the comment data base
October 2006 Components of the comment data base 2 comments sitting MAC outbox (1 for PSMP and 1 for Beam) 2 duplicate comments in MAC main sheet 1 withdrawn comment in PHY main sheet Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

8 Status by component October 2006 beam 11 8 9 109 5 142 28 19.7 ca 14 1
Last Updated By A C R L W D ER Blank Total Done % Done beam 11 8 9 109 5 142 28 19.7 ca 14 1 2 7 25 24 96 coex 3 309 318 2.2 dup edited 244 131 375 100 edited in D1_05 270 372 52 694 editorials 12 frame 36 61 general 4 mac 79 71 167 13 7.7 mac outbox no edit required 182 255 402 26 865 phy 35 40 178 124 385 81 21 psmp 19 20 Totals 731 813 519 29 734 267 3118 2099 67.3 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation


Download ppt "TGn Editor Report Oct 2006 Date: Authors: October 2006"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google