Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKatrien van de Velde Modified over 5 years ago
1
Utility of clinical pathway and prospective case management to achieve cost and hospital stay reduction for aortic aneurysm surgery at a tertiary care hospital Satish C. Muluk, MD, Lisa Painter, MSN, Saba Sile, BS, Robert Y. Rhee, MD, Michel S. Makaroun, MD, David L. Steed, MD, Marshall W. Webster, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997) DOI: /S (97) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
2
Fig. 1 Patient groups in relation to institution of pathway and pathway modifications. Journal of Vascular Surgery , 84-93DOI: ( /S (97) ) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
3
Fig. 2 Impact of pathway implementation: comparison of Groups I and II (see text for details). *Difference from group I marginally significant (p = 0.09). Journal of Vascular Surgery , 84-93DOI: ( /S (97) ) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
4
Fig. 2 Impact of pathway implementation: comparison of Groups I and II (see text for details). *Difference from group I marginally significant (p = 0.09). Journal of Vascular Surgery , 84-93DOI: ( /S (97) ) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
5
Fig. 3 Importance in group II of volume overload by CXR. *Significant difference between groups (p < 0.05). Journal of Vascular Surgery , 84-93DOI: ( /S (97) ) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
6
Fig. 3 Importance in group II of volume overload by CXR. *Significant difference between groups (p < 0.05). Journal of Vascular Surgery , 84-93DOI: ( /S (97) ) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
7
Fig. 4 Impact of pathway implementation and interim changes in pathway: comparison of groups I, II, and III (see text for details). &, Difference from group I marginally significant (p = 0.09); *, value significantly different from group I value (p < 0.05); #, value significantly different from group II value (p < 0.05); ns, value not significantly different from group I value; n/a, data not available for group I. Journal of Vascular Surgery , 84-93DOI: ( /S (97) ) Copyright © 1997 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.