1. CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: 2001/2002
Department of Correctional Services
Vote 19
CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: 2001/2002

2. CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE:
AS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2002

3. CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE:
PER PROGRAMME

4. CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE:
PER STANDARD ITEM

5. CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE:
PER PROVINCE

6. Department of Correctional Services
Vote 20
MTEF BASELINE ALLOCATION: 2002/2003 – 2004/2005

7. AIM OF DCS
To contribute to maintaining and protecting a just, peaceful and safe society by enforcing sentences of the courts in the manner prescribed by the Correctional Services Act (Act no 111 of 1998), detaining all prisoners in safe custody whilst ensuring their human dignity and promoting the social responsibility and human development of all prisoners and persons subject to community corrections.

8. Vision and Mission Vision Mission
To be one of the best in the world in delivering correctional services with integrity and commitment   
Mission
To deliver a Correctional Service in partnership with stakeholders by providing:
incarceration of prisoners under conditions consistent with human dignity;
rehabilitation and reintegration programmes,
proper supervision of persons under community corrections
procurement and acquisition of adequate resources which enable effective
response to challenges
through progressive management, trained personnel, sound work ethics,
performance management and good governance.

9. CORE BUSINESS OF DCS To keep offenders in safe custody.
To supervise and control probationers and parolees.
To maintain control, discipline and a safe environment in prison.
To provide humane conditions for offenders.
To provide rehabilitation programmes which help offenders to address their offending behaviour and allow them to live and lead responsible lives.
To assist offenders with re-integration into the community.

10. MEDIUM TERM OBJECTIVES
KEY DEPARTMENTAL
MEDIUM TERM OBJECTIVES
·      Development of a Green Paper on Correctional Services.
·      Create a culture of Good Governance to combat corruption,
crime, malpractice and mal- administration within the
Department.
·      Improvement of the skills capacity of lower level staff and the
retention of skilled personnel.
·     Improvement of prisoner management.
·     Taking appropriate measures to adequately address the
special needs of targeted prisoner categories including but
not limited to: the youth; females; the aged; pregnant females
and mothers with infants; terminally-ill prisoners; the mentally
challenged; and prisoners with disabilities.
·      Enhancement of rehabilitation programmes.
·      Enhancement of prisoner peer-educator programmes.

11. MEDIUM TERM OBJECTIVES
KEY DEPARTMENTAL
MEDIUM TERM OBJECTIVES
·      Deployment of prisoner generated goods and services including
labour for poverty and disaster relief and rural development.
·      Enhancement of Community Corrections.
·   Significantly decrease incarcerated population to reduce
overcrowding.
·     Development of significant cost reducing prison facility prototype
designs.
·      Significantly improving the maintenance and repair of facilities.
·     Significantly increase prison accommodations to reduce

12. DEPARTMENTAL PROGRAMMES
·      Administration, which comprises the Ministry and other senior policy-
makers and managers of the Department.
 ·     Incarceration secures prisoners and ensures the sound management of
Correctional Services facilities.
 ·  Rehabilitation provides opportunities for education and training,
skills development, personal development, spiritual enlightenment and
preparation for release.
 ·      Community corrections ensure the direct supervision of probationers and
parolees.
 ·     Facility Mangement and Capital Works provide for accommodation needs
of the department.

13. MTEF BASELINE ALLOCATIONS
2002/2003: 2004/2005
2001/2002
Year 0
R’000
2002/2003
Year 0+1
R’000
2003/2004
Year 0+2
R’000
2004/2005
Year 0+3
R’000
Original Baseline allocation
Revised baseline allocation
% Increase on previous year % % %

14. National Treasury Allocations: Detail
2002/2003
Year 0+1
R’000
2003/2004
Year 0+2
R’000
2004/2005
Year 0+3
R’000
MTEF Baseline
Supplementary Infrastructure Allocations
Maintenance and upgrade of existing prisons
Construction and Maintenance of a new prison
Adjustment to Baseline
Inflation and Related Adjustments
Total

15. Budget Allocations per programme
MTEF: 2002/2003 – 2004/2005
2001/2002
Year 0+1
R’000
2002/2003
Year 0+1
R’000
2003/2004
Year 0+2
R’000
2004/2005
Year 0+3
R’000
Administration
Incarceration
Rehabilitation
Community corrections
Facility Management
and Capital works
- Capital Works/Facility Man
- Apops
Total

16. Budget Allocations Standard Item
MTEF: 2002/2003 – 2004/2005
2001/2002
Year 0+1
R’000
2002/2003
Year 0+1
R’000
2003/2004
Year 0+2
R’000
2004/2005
Year 0+3
R’000
Personnel
Administrative expenditure
Inventories
Equipment
Land and buildings
Professional and Special Services
Transfer Payments
Total

17. Budget Allocations Per Province
2001/2002 versus 2002/2003

18. Budget Allocations : Key Features
MTEF: 2001/2002 versus2002/2003
2001/2002
R’000
2002/2003
R’000
Personnel expenditure
Human Resource Development
Overtime
Medical Aid(Medcor)
Vehicles
Information Technology
Electronic Monitoring
Inmate Tracking

19. Budget Allocations : Key Features
MTEF: 2001/2002 versus2002/2003
2001/2002
R’000
2002/2003
R’000
Facilities Management
Capital Works
Apops
Rehabilitation of offenders
Medical Treatment (Prisoners)
Parole Boards

20. D.C.S
COST DRIVERS
MTEF: 2002/2003 – 2004/2005

21. COST DRIVER: PRISON ACCOMMODATION
Voted
Year 0
2001/2002
Year
0+1
2002/2003
Year
0+2
2003/2004
Year
0+3
2004/2005
Existing Accommodation
Plus: Additional financed
Upgrading/ Extensions
New DCS Prisons
APOPS Prisons
Financed prison accommodation
Projected DAPP
%Overcrowding % % % %

22. FINANCED OFFENDER POPULATION
COST DRIVER:
FINANCED OFFENDER POPULATION
Voted
Year 0
2001/2002
Year
0+1
2002/2003
Year
0+2
2003/2004
Year
0+3
2004/2005
Prisoners
DCS
APOPS
Probationers and Parolees
Total Offenders (Financed)
Projected Offender Population
Unfunded offender population

23. PERSONNEL ESTABLISHMENT NEED
COST DRIVER:
PERSONNEL ESTABLISHMENT NEED
Year 0
2001/2002
Year 0+1
2002/2003
Year 0+2
2003/2004
Year 0+3
2004/2005
Head Office
Provincial Offices
Management Areas
Total Personnel Need
Financed MTEF
Plus: Add. Financed
Total Financed
Shortfall

24. OPTIONS
PRESENTED
TO NATIONAL TREASURY

25. OPTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING
2002/2003
Year 0+1
R’000
2003/2004
Year 0+2
R’000
2004/2005
Year 0+3
R’000
Salary Increase: D.C. S Officials
Total projected prison population
Backlog personnel establishment
Needs Based Rehab. Programme
New prison accommodation
Agricultural self-sufficiency
TOTAL

26. OPTION :1 Salary increase: DCS officials
Negotiations for a special salary increase (on a sliding scale from 3 to 10 %- excluding mangement) for DCS officials with implementation date 1 April 2002.
Financial Implications :
2002/03- R 309,263 million
2003/04- R 327,548 million
2004/05- R 345,574 million

27. OPTION 2: Funding of total Projected Prison Population
The option is aimed to ensure effective achievement of the Departmental core objectives in providing a safe and humane custody in terms of the Constitution and Correctional Services Act. It involves the funding of the projected cost for the total projected daily average prison population .
Financial Implications :
2002/03- R 76,630 million
2003/04- R 123,991 million
2004/05- R 184,351 million

28. OPTION: 3
Backlog on personnel establishment and personnel needs for new prisons
Funding of the backlog on the personnel establishment, personnel needs for new prisons already opened and to be opened within the MTEF period
Financial Implications :
2002/03- R 389 million- Backlog-R million New prisons R million
2003/04- R million
2004/05- R million- Backlog R million New prisons R million

29. OPTION:4
Development and implementation of needs based rehabilitation programmes.
Engagement of the community in the rehabilitation programmes and the development and implementation of need based rehabilitation programmes by the year 2003
Financial Implications :
2002/03- R 13,349million
2003/04- R 10,829million
2004/05- R 11,034million

30. OPTION : 5
Building of three additional prisons and upgrading of existing facilities
Financial Implications :
2002/03- R 270,045 million
2003/04- R 354,231 million
2004/05- R million

31. OPTION : 6 Increase Agricultural Self-sufficiency
This option will enhance self-sufficiency especially regarding the production of animal products.
The additional infrastructure created will increase the rehabilitation capacity, whilst the cost-effective production will decrease the incarceration costs.
Financial Implications :
2002/03- R million
2003/04- R 9,694 million
2004/05- R 11,194 million
Saving for DCS per annum : R 2,788 million