1. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis 
Dr Hannah Blencowe, MRCPCH, Prof Simon Cousens, DipMathstat, Fiorella Bianchi Jassir, MSc, Lale Say, MD, Doris Chou, MD, Colin Mathers, PhD, Dan Hogan, PhD, Suhail Shiekh, MSc, Zeshan U Qureshi, BM, Danzhen You, PhD, Prof Joy E Lawn, FRCPCH 
The Lancet Global Health 
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages e98-e108 (February 2016)
DOI: /S X(15)
Copyright © 2016 Blencowe et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1 Flow diagram for input data
*See appendix p 7 for details. †Includes those with more than one definition for a given country year (n=432).
The Lancet Global Health 2016 4, e98-e108DOI: ( /S X(15) )
Copyright © 2016 Blencowe et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Availability and type of stillbirth data by region around 1990–2000 and 2000–10
See appendix p 67 for details. CRVS=civil registration and vital statistics.
The Lancet Global Health 2016 4, e98-e108DOI: ( /S X(15) )
Copyright © 2016 Blencowe et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Variation between countries in stillbirth rates in 2015 showing the ten countries with the highest rates, and those with the largest numbers
See appendix pp 100–04 for details.
The Lancet Global Health 2016 4, e98-e108DOI: ( /S X(15) )
Copyright © 2016 Blencowe et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND Terms and Conditions