1. Leader as an integrity builder
Achala Dahal/ Shiva Hari Adhikari

2. Session outlines Factors influencing integrity
Integrity leader/ integrity builder
Ethical dilemma during decision making
Solving integrity problem
Compliance vs. Integrity

3. A thought…….
5/18/2019

4. Key questions Am I giving my best?
Will my action or decisions be in the interest of or for the greatest good for the greatest number?
How do I decide upon ethical dilemma?
Am I willing to stand up for and defend what is right?
Do you know what is right or good at work?
Is it enough?
How potential am I? Am I am performing with my full potentiality?
What is my approach of decision making? Am I guided with public interest?

5. Factors influencing integrity
Individual Factors
Social Factors
Contextual Factors
Values
Ethics
Moral principle
Knowledge/ Experience
Personal goal
Personality
Social relations
Culture
Religion
MY CHOICE
Politicial
Economic
Legal
Technological
Powers

6. Integrity Leader and Integrity Builder

7. Recall the characteristics of the leader who you find with high integrity.

8. Integrity Leader and Builder
Consistency in actions
Committed to do the right thing for the right reason.
Shows concerns on public interest
Transparency
Believes in zero tolerance to corruption
Establishes and constructs ethical culture
Communicates and follows ethical standards consistently
Innovates and takes risk
Shows courage
Integrity Builder

9. Core Characteristics of Toxic Leader
 the capacity to work effectively within organizations. It involves understanding how institutions work and knowing how best to foster 
1. Commitment to public interest
1. Commitment to public interest
2. Incorruptibility
2. Incorruptibility
4. Experimentation
3. Consistency of goal
6. Institutional intelligence
5. Competence

10. Core Characteristics of Popular and Self-serving Leader
1. Commitment to public interest
1. Commitment to public interest
2. Incorruptibility
2. Incorruptibility
4. Experimentation
3. Consistency of goal
6. Institutional intelligence
5. Competence

11. Core Characteristics of Integrity Builder
1. Commitment to public interest
2. Incorruptibility
4. Experimentation
3. Consistency of goal
6. Institutional intelligence
5. Competence

12. Have you heard of the reform initiatives of Ram Bahadur Kurumbang ?
Ram Bahadur Kurumbang, Finalist, Integrity Idol mp4

13. Integrity Building Approaches
A lawyer’s approach
Toughening laws & legislations
A businessman’s approach
Offering incentives to officials to disengage from corruption (buy out corruption).
A market or an economist’s approach
Introduce or increase competition
An institutional approach
Genuine political/leadership commitment

14. Ethical Dilemma An ethical dilemma is the situation
to choose between two options, both of which are morally correct but in conflict.
Ethics and morals are inseparable. They both deal with questions of right and wrong. What constitutes ethical behavior is determined by societal or cultural norms. What constitutes moral behavior is up to the individual to decide based on his own sense of right and wrong.

15. Ethical Decision Making
E:\Presentation at NASC\Decision Making\Ethical Dilemma_(360p).mp4

16. Ethical Framework for Decision Making
Five Sources of Ethical Standards for Decision Making
The Utilitarian Approach
The ethical action is the one that will produce the greatest balance of benefits over harms.
The Rights Approach The ethical action is the one that most dutifully respects the rights of all affected.
The Fairness or Justice Approach The ethical action is the one that treats people equally, or if unequally, that treats people proportionately and fairly.
The Common Good Approach The ethical action is the one that contributes most to the achievement of a quality common life together.
Virtue Approach
The ethical action is the one that embodies the habits and values of humans at their best.

17. Forethought….
We encountered lots of ethical dilemma in our everyday life, but when we make decision we need to follow/base on an appropriate approach.

18. Integrity building: compliance v/s integrity
When going on the journey of integrity leader has to choose various approaches
Based on compliance (reactive and proactive)
Based on integrity building (reactive and proactive)

19. Compliance Approach
 A Compliance Approach to reducing corruption and/or solving integrity or ethical challenges is characterized by being: • Rules-based • Focused on the application and enforcement of rules and procedures • Adversarial: naming, shaming, litigation • Problem-focused • Less Discretion

20. Integrity Approach
 The Integrity Approach to reducing corruption and/or solving integrity or ethical challenges is characterized by being: • Values-based • Aware of discrepancies between policies, rules and laws, and its implementation • Collaboration-focused
• Solution-focused • More discretion

21. Reactive Proactive Compliance Integrity Community Integrity Building
Compliance training
Integrity testing
Zero tolerance policy
Code of Conduct
Business Collective Action
Supplier “white lists”
Rewards to whistle-blowers
Integrity Pact
Medium return, Medium risk
Community Integrity Building
Multi-stakeholder initiatives with oversight
Integrity as competitive differentiator
Holistic/step change
High return, High risk
The Integrity Pact, developed by Transparency International, is a tool for preventing corruption, mainly used in public contracting. It is essentially an agreement between the government agency offering a contract and the companies bidding for it, that they will abstain from bribery, collusion and other corrupt practices for the extent of the contract.  Most Integrity Pacts rely on digitally-based procedures to prevent direct contact between bidders with their bids, and the persons involved in the decision-making process.  To ensure accountability, Integrity Pacts also include a monitoring system typically led by civil society or other external groups.
Ethics advice center
Ethics officer
Code of Ethics
Compliance-plus ethics
Low return, Low risk
Whistle-blower hotline
Whistle-blower protection
Supplier “black lists”
Low return, Low risk
Compliance Integrity
Adopted from Integrity Action

22. Reactive Proactive Compliance Integrity Community Integrity Building
Compliance training
Integrity testing
Zero tolerance policy
Code of Conduct
Business Collective Action
Supplier “white lists”
Rewards to whistle-blowers
Integrity Pact
Medium return, Medium risk
Community Integrity Building
Multi-stakeholder initiatives with oversight
Integrity as competitive differentiator
Holistic/step change
High return, High risk
The Integrity Pact, developed by Transparency International, is a tool for preventing corruption, mainly used in public contracting. It is essentially an agreement between the government agency offering a contract and the companies bidding for it, that they will abstain from bribery, collusion and other corrupt practices for the extent of the contract.  Most Integrity Pacts rely on digitally-based procedures to prevent direct contact between bidders with their bids, and the persons involved in the decision-making process.  To ensure accountability, Integrity Pacts also include a monitoring system typically led by civil society or other external groups.
Ethics advice center
Ethics officer
Code of Ethics
Compliance-plus ethics
Low return, Low risk
Whistle-blower hotline
Whistle-blower protection
Supplier “black lists”
Low return, Low risk
Compliance Integrity
Adopted from Integrity Action

23. Conclusion No single way or quadrants is enough.
But everyone base their action based on one way and move to and fro.
Integrity leader based their efforts being on reactive compliance to proactive integrity and Integrity builder based their approach based on proactive integrity and use reactive compliance as on means when necessary.

24. Thank you