1. Kayleigh Darling Richard Heinrich Britney Reed Laura Vazquez
Altruism
Kayleigh Darling
Richard Heinrich
Britney Reed
Laura Vazquez

2. Altruism
Defined as:
"Helpful behavior that an individual exhibits toward another individual in the absence of an external or internal reward."
It is difficult to define altruism. This definition is a blend of the definition found in the dictionary and the ideas of different philosophers.

3. Convergent Validity
Defined as: data indicating that a test measures the same construct as other tests purporting to measure the same construct
The following are from the Self-Report Altruism Scale
21. I have helped a classmate who I did not know that well with a homework assignment when my knowledge was greater than his or hers
22. I have given directions to a stranger.
23. I have allowed someone to go ahead of me in a lineup (at a Xerox machine, in the supermarket).
24. I have delayed an elevator and held the door open for a stranger.
25. I have offer my seat on a bus or train to a stranger who was standing.

4. Descriptive Statistics
In total, there were176 (N=176) participants ranging in age from 18 to 70.
The questions used a 5 point Likert scale
Most questions had a low variance, however some such as question 19 and 25 had σ²>1.
In addition, there were 62 (35.0%) males and 104 (58.8%) females
Twenty seven (15.3%) participants identified themselves as African American, 13 (7.3%) as Asian, 109 (61.6%) as Caucasian, 10 (5.6%) as Hispanic and 7 (4.0%) as Other.
Eighteen (10.2%) participants identified themselves as psychology majors, while 148 (93.8%) did not.
Seventy-five (42.4%) identified themselves as college students while the remaining 91 (51.4%) did not.

5. Reliability Item Analysis
The initial measure of reliability was approximately α=.382
This was computed from 168 participants (9 were excluded by SPSS probably due to missing data).
Problem items were then identified and deleted, increasing the reliability to α=.660.
Deleted items included questions such as “If I do not know someone I will not help them” and “If I help someone and do not get recognized for it, I am disappointed”
These items had good face validity, however when the statistics were analyzed, these items proved to be unreliable.
A one-way ANOVA was also performed for Gender, Ethnicity, Age, and College Grad status but no significant result was found in either categories.

6. Reliability Item Analysis
The variance was quite large before the item elimination, and the questions that were eliminated seemed to account for a large part of the variance.
σ²(before): vs. σ²(after): .032
The reduction in variance seemed to increase the reliability of the overall measure, as variance is used in the computation of Cronbach’s alpha as evidenced from the formula

7. Scale Modification
The reliability of 20 items was measured by Cronbach’s alpha which was initially found to be 0.382, which shows a low degree of internal consistency.
In the table below it was shown that separate factors existed, since some items had a Cronbach’s alpha of greater than
Items 5, 11, 12, and 16 were eliminated in an attempt to increase the reliability. After the problem items were eliminated, the Cronbach’s alpha increased to

8. The Questionnaire Self-report measure Consisted of 25 questions
First 20 questions developed by the authors
Last 5 questions from the “Self-Report Altruism Scale” (Rushton, Chrisjohn, & Fekken, 1981).
- Reliability: α=.51
- Positively correlated with measures of empathy and social responsibility.
5-point Likert Scale
Higher Score indicates higher altruism

9. Corrected Item-Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha If Item Deleted
1. If I have needed a favor in the past, the first person I turned to is someone who I did a favor for
.214
.359
2. I find myself believing in the motto "I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine"
.241
.351
3. I would help someone even if it put me in danger.
.218
.357
4. In my opinion, people should rewarded for helping others
.156
.364
5. If I do not know someone I will not help them.
-.044
.392
6. If I saw someone with a flat tire I would help them.
.158
7. I would help someone even if I did not like them.
.334
.342
8. I try to teach children to show concern for others.
.197
.356
9. I aspire to resemble the actions of people such as Mother Theresa or Martin Luther King Jr.
.220
.352
10. I have thought that helping others is a waste of my time.
-.079
.396
11. If I help someone and I am not recognized for it, I feel disappointed.
-.029
.391
12. If you can help someone, you should.
.089
.589
13. I feel good when I help someone.
.298
.341
14. I find myself believing that in this world it is everyone for himself or herself.
.150
.365
15. I tend to put the needs of others ahead of my own
.256
16. I find myself doing things for other people, even when it is not convenient for me.
.046
.384
17. I' ve helped someone in order to get on his/her good side.
.163
18. If I see someone who needs help I feel compelled to help.
.311
.345
19. I am more likely to help a friend or family member than a stranger.
.079
.376
20. When I see someone in need, I do not think about what it will cost me to help, I just do something about it.
.290
.348

10. Construct Validity
In order to find the other concepts that were being measured, the scale was divided into two components.
A factor analysis was performed to divide the data into two components:
Component 1 consists of items 7, 8, 9, 13, 15, 18, and 20. It was renamed Selflessness and had a reliability of
Component 2 consists of items 3, 4, 10, 11, 14, and 17. It was renamed Self-centered and has a reliability of
The total variance explained was %. Using a criterion of 0.4

11. Component 1 2
1. If I have needed a favor in the past, the first person I turned to is someone who I did a favor for
2. I find myself believing in the motto "I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine"
3. I would help someone even if it put me in danger.
.335
4. In my opinion, people should rewarded for helping others
.533
5. If I do not know someone I will not help them.
6. If I saw someone with a flat tire I would help them.
7. I would help someone even if I did not like them.
.670
8. I try to teach children to show concern for others.
.715
9. I aspire to resemble the actions of people such as Mother Theresa or Martin Luther King Jr.
.500
10. I have thought that helping others is a waste of my time.
.692
11. If I help someone and I am not recognized for it, I feel disappointed.
.636
12. If you can help someone, you should.
13. I feel good when I help someone.
.591
14. I find myself believing that in this world it is everyone for himself or herself.
.532
15. I tend to put the needs of others ahead of my own
.595
16. I find myself doing things for other people, even when it is not convenient for me.
.732
17. I' ve helped someone in order to get on his/her good side.
.653
18. If I see someone who needs help I feel compelled to help.
19. I am more likely to help a friend or family member than a stranger.
20. When I see someone in need, I do not think about what it will cost me to help, I just do something about it.
.642

12. Validation Plan
The validity of this measure is in question due to several factors:
First, massive user fatigue would dramatically increase the probability that the test users answered in response sets.
Response sets can easily be identified if reverse scoring is used.
It would be advisable to standardize the administration procedure. Since the participants were volunteers and did not take the assessment in one place, there is no way to know whether every participant had a standardized environment in which to take the assessment.
A stratified random sampling procedure could also be employed in order to get a more accurate estimate of ethnic/gender differences.

13. Validation Plan Cont’d
Another plan for validating the assessment would be to norm the test on a representative population (preferably one that mimics the real population demographics).
In order to establish greater convergent validity, one could compare the assessment to a measure of empathy.
Comparing the altruism assessment to a measure of selfishness could also be used to establish discriminant validity.

14. Altering Questions More situational examples
Example: I feel good when I help someone finish their home work.
Vs. I feel good when I help someone.
Example: If I see someone who is injured, I feel compelled to help.
Vs. If I see someone who needs help I feel compelled to help.

15. References
Cohen, R. & Swerdlik, M. (2005). Pychological Testing and Assessment. McGraw-Hill, New York, 6th ed.
Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self- report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2,