1. Ic vs field perpendicular to ab plane-two samples cut from what we got
We had to cut because of space limit in our rotator

2. Angular dependence @ B=4 T
After this measurement we try to measure angular dependence at 20 T but sample broke – including hastelloy

3. Comparison to other samples containing BZO
sample M MS
norm to 12mm, thickness 2.15 um
sample M MS
norm to 12 mm thickness 1.5 um

4. The same on log-log scale
sample M MS
norm to 12mm, thickness 2.15 um
sample M MS
norm to 12 mm thickness 1.5 um

5. Omparision with sample M3-609-1-MS (it is normalized to 4 mm width!)
It seems that at least at B=4T tape 2140 has wider ab peak that the other one
And smaller anisotropy.
sample M MS
norm to 4mm, thickness 2.15 um

6. It would be interesting to have higher fields angular dependence for the present tape
But two samples broke when we attempted to measure them at higher field/higher angles
In the past we had similar problems with other samples : degradation, delamination or even total
Break . Especially with the samples without copper coating.as tapes , and
So we faild to check if the present tape has also this cusp-like behavior around ab plane as sample
M MS shown below-this was the most robust sample we measure so far

7. 1 modify the probe: holders to thin? To short?
2 make straight probe for perpendicular measurements
3 find good flux for In and Sn/Pb
4 to find how we can mount samples other than SP tapes?
5 AMSC samples at A/cm-wide SF ???