1. Break Out 5: AP-929 Revision
Facilitator: Mike Stout - SPESCOM
May 11, 2019
Cleveland 2005

2. Revision 1 Reaction
Room Survey: 9/12 participants use AP in some fashion, such as basis for:
MOD process (Reference and non-reference)
Product and Procedure Development
CM program (Site and Fleet)
Access/Validate other Processes
Training
May 11, 2019
Cleveland 2005

3. Response to Summary of Changes
Item 1
May 11, 2019
Cleveland 2005

4. New Material Performance Indicators:
Caution: What is measured is perceived to be important, choose PI’s carefully
KPI for Margin desired
May 11, 2019
Cleveland 2005

5. Level of Detail Discussion Feedback
Should Show Links to Other Processes
Operation Guidance Docs
Maintenance Guidance Docs
Confusion on Process Flow Chart regardings “Shoulds” and “Shalls” on Feedback Legs
Include Reference to ANSI std for definition of “Critical” Docs
Awareness on CM Can/Needs to be Raised Through Training on AP-929
May 11, 2019
Cleveland 2005

6. Links to NEI & NIRMA Discussion Topics Item 1 May 11, 2019
Cleveland 2005

7. Feedback to INPO
Increase acknowledgement/Awareness of Relationship Between CM and Other Processes Through Training and Actual Links Within The Guidance Documents
May 11, 2019
Cleveland 2005

8. Take Away Points
Group Insights
Item 1
May 11, 2019
Cleveland 2005