Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGlenna Hermawan Modified over 5 years ago
1
GOVERNANCE OF RISK: THE BOARD - RISK LEADER OR FOLLOWER?
Deon van der Westhuizen
2
Key points of presentation
Providing leadership in risk management The nature and extent of the strategic risks The role of combined assurance and how it assists the Board Setting and achieving its strategic objectives Risks discussed at board level are not aligned to strategic objectives How can boards take a proactive and leadership role in risk governance? Ongoing monitoring of residual risk against the risk appetite Risk management and accountability
3
From Risk Management to Risk Leadership
What I like is the recommended shift from traditional risk management thinking — what might go wrong — to a focus on whether the right levels of the right risks are being taken — the result of informed and intelligent decision-making. David Renz "Are you helping your executives, board, and management across the extended enterprise make informed and intelligent decisions that drive the organization to success — the achievement of its objectives by intelligent risk-taking?" Making executives or the board risk-averse is paving the path to failure, not to success.
5
Auditor-general report
Operational losses Legal complications Consequence management
6
Working capital management
Current ratio = 0.44:1
7
Rating agency No ability to raise finance
8
Financial measurement
Staff - 40% vacant No repairs and maintenance
9
Performance Water losses = 36%
10
Operational loss R478m / 12 = R40m per month
11
Value creation vs preservation
COSO 4 fraud risk Planning and dashboard M and A’s Sources of cash 2nd line of defense Legal compliance Cash flow management Emerging risks Demand management Skills audit Preventative maintenance
12
Evolution of Enterprise Risk and Resilience Management (ERM)
13
Risk Universe
14
The value killers – drop in share prices
15
Key risks market capitalization losses
16
Value killers 2005 to 2014 Source: Deloitte –The Value Killers Revisited, 2014
17
Time for share price to recover
Source: Deloitte –The Value Killers Revisited, 2014.
18
Nature and extent of strategic risks
19
Extreme weather Natural disasters Cyberattacks Water Large scale migration Ecosystem collapse
20
Interconnectivity
21
Deloitte – focus on strategic risks 2019
22
Compliance and regulatory push
23
Combined assurance - 3 LOD or 5 LOA
24
Residual risk versus risk appetite
25
Broad responsibilities of the Board
The board provides direction to senior management by setting risk appetite. It also seeks to identify the principal (key) risks. Board assures itself on an ongoing basis that senior management is responding appropriately to these risks (oversight) Board delegates to the CEO and senior management primary ownership and responsibility for operating risk management and control. Management provides leadership and direction re risk management, and to control overall risk-taking activities in relation to the agreed level of risk appetite. To ensure the effectiveness of risk management, the board and senior management rely on adequate line functions – including monitoring and assurance functions
26
First line of defense
27
Second line of defense
28
Focus on the second line of defense
29
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) help a firm see how it is performing in relation to its strategic goals and objectives. Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) are leading indicators of risk to business performance, giving early warning about potential risk event Use KRIs to monitor risks are in the areas such as: natural catastrophe risks (as % of group shareholder equity) asset-liability matching (duration mismatch) strategic asset allocation (% allowed in investment category) credit risk (weighted average credit rating) other risks specific to business or functional areas KPI’s and KRI’s
30
Minimum tools in the toolbox
Lean six sigma Root cause expert Fishbone diagram Pareto analysis Data mining IT auditing skills Boardroom presence Minimum tools in the toolbox
31
Lean Six Sigma - Integration of Two Powerful Business Improvement Approaches...
Lean Speed + Waste Elimination Six Sigma Quality, Cost Goal – Improve performance on items Critical to Customer Quality (CTQs) Focus – Use DMAIC with (TQM) tools to eliminate variation Method – Management engagement, dedicated team effort Goal – Reduce waste and increase process speed Focus – Implementing Waste reduction tools Method – Improvement events Value Stream Mapping Implicit – Success is dependant upon the value of other variables in the function. Results not readily apparent. Explicit – Very specific, clear typical quality measures. Lean Speed Enables Six Sigma Quality (Faster Cycles of Experimentation/learning) Six Sigma Quality Enables Lean Speed (Fewer Defects Means Less Time Spent on Rework) Efficiency Effectiveness
32
Pareto Analysis
33
Fishbone Diagram Material Machine Methods
Discovery of different discount rates occurs too late in process Computer screens Billing process not accurate Updates Too many “jumps” Product Shortages Master customer discount table not up-to-date Effect: Too many price adjustments at check-out Incomplete Training on common complaints Power Failures Management Policies Not enough staffing during peak times Marketing metrics counterproductive Unfamiliarity with procedures For vacation notification Notification of absence Mother Nature Measurements Manpower Root Cause Analysis
34
Third line of defense - auditing
35
Any Questions? Deon van der Westhuizen
uniratings/
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.