Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

DISCUSSION INPUT: ASPECTS OF FAIR AND SUSTAINABLE TAXATION

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "DISCUSSION INPUT: ASPECTS OF FAIR AND SUSTAINABLE TAXATION"— Presentation transcript:

1 DISCUSSION INPUT: ASPECTS OF FAIR AND SUSTAINABLE TAXATION
Tibor Hanappi, Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, OECD FairTax Stakeholder Event Brussels, 19 February 2019

2 Tax Challenges arising from Digitalisation
Cross-jurisdictional scale without mass Ability to remotely develop and interact with a global customer base Facilitates relocation of production processes & centralisation of functions HDBs often highly involved in economic life of a jurisdiction with little/no physical presence Complex reality Three key factors prevalent in certain highly digitalised businesses (HDBs) Reliance on intangible assets, including IP Data available on growing importance of investment in intangibles Intangible assets crucial value driver of HDBs Conclusions: TFDE identified 3 factors commonly observed in HDBs, and relevant for tax purposes […] Caveats: complexity + non-exclusivity No agreement on nature/scale of last factor Data, user participation and their synergies with IP Data value cycle (e.g. collection, storage, analysis) becomes a key aspect of HDBs Users increasingly involved in value creation process of some HDBs Not always exclusive or specific to HDBs

3 Tax Challenges arising from Digitalisation
Characteristics frequently observed in HDBs and their interaction with international tax rules – potential implications? Impact on the distribution of taxing rights e.g., increasing share of profits from cross-border activities not taxed in market jurisdiction? Cross-jurisdictional scale without mass Mobility of key profit allocation factors, and difficulty to determine ownership/management e.g., increasing share of profits can easily be shifted around within an MNE group with limited changes in functions? Reliance on intangible assets New element of Interim Report: Explores further the potential implications of the salient features of HDB for the tax system Description: Feature/evolution – fact/problem – potential tax implication […] Data and user participation Potential new source/material contribution to value creation not captured by the current tax framework e.g., ability of business that exploits data and user-generated content to have little/no physical presence in jurisdiction of users?

4 Task Force on the Digital Economy (TFDE)
IF & TFDE More than 113 jurisdictions working together on an equal footing Initial Mandate (September 2013) New Mandate (January 2017) Subsidiary Body of the CFA Subsidiary Body of the Inclusive Framework on BEPS (IF) Work mandated by the Action Plan on BEPS (Action 1) Follow-up work mandated by BEPS Action 1 Report Set the Scene (process/substance) Beginning: BEPS project Action 1 TFDE: ad-hoc group created for specific purpose, report to CFA Action 1 Report (2015): conclusion is unfinished work New Phase of work: IF on BEPS, new mandate Timeline: Interim Report (end of 2018, advanced to April by G20 FM), Final Report (2020) BEPS Action 1 Report delivered in October 2015 Interim Report delivered in March 2018 Final Report by end 2020

5 Different Country Perspectives
Broad spectrum of divergent countries’ views, that can generally be described as falling within three groups Failure to take into consideration user-generated value in certain HDBs create misalignments between where profits are taxed and where value is created This does not undermine the principles of the existing international tax framework Only targeted changes needed Digitalisation and globalisation pose challenges to the effectiveness of some basic concepts underlying the existing international tax framework (e.g. transfer pricing, PE definition) These challenges are not exclusive or specific to highly digitalised business models BEPS measures have largely addressed double non-taxation, and more time is required to assess their full impact Generally satisfied with the existing tax system and do not currently see the need for any further reform Another new element: While no agreement on whether and to what extent the features of HDB require changes to international tax rules (nexus/profit allocation). Description/clarification of the different country positions, and classification in 3 relevant categories Description of each group […] First Group Second Group Third Group

6 Review of the Key Concepts
Commitment of the members of the IF to… 1 Undertake a coherent and concurrent review of the profit allocation and nexus rules 2 Work towards a consensus-based solution by 2020 (with an update to be provided in 2019) Last but not least: Strong commitment to work together in IF towards a consensus-based solution in 2020 (save the multilateral tax framework) By undertaking a concurrent review of profit allocation and nexus rules Next steps (how to get there?) […] Taking forward this commitment will require to… WP1 Refine the analysis of value creation in HDBs Test the feasibility of technical solutions Clarify the parameters of such revision WP6 TFDE

7 What happened since the Interim Report?
Intensive TFDE work since April 2018 Focus on developing consensus-based solutions Country proposals GLOBE User participation Marketing intangibles Significant Economic Presence

8 Allocation of taxing rights Comprehensive work on 2 pillars
Proposed Way Forward BEPS issues Allocation of taxing rights Comprehensive work on 2 pillars « Without Prejudice » Basis Release of a Policy Note by the Inclusive Framework on 29 January 2019

9 Key Challenges: Summary
Digital Interim measures for taxation of e-services Long-term challenges of nexus and profit attribution Leveraging opportunities for improved compliance New challenges such as crypto- currencies Tax Policy Technically complex Divergent positions Global engagement Tax Administration

10 Pursue technical analysis Develop detailed work programme
Next Steps Pursue technical analysis Public consultation (March 2019) Develop detailed work programme G20 update (June 2019)

11 Giorgia.Maffini@oecd.org || www.oecd.org/tax
Contact details Tibor Hanappi Tax Policy and Statistics Division Centre for Tax Policy and Administration 2, rue André Pascal Paris Cedex 16 Tel: – Fax:   ||

12 Categories of Relevant Measures
Alternative PE thresholds Withholding Taxes Turnover Taxes Specific regimes for large MNEs Digital presence-type of PEs (e.g. Israel, India, Slovakia) Virtual Service PE (e.g. Saudi Arabia) Broader royalty definitions (e.g. Philippines, Malaysia, UK) Technical service fees (e.g. UN Model Tax Convention) Online advertising (e.g. Thailand) Sectoral taxes, such as for advertisement (e.g. Hungary) or audio-visual content (e.g. France) Levy on Digital Transactions (Italy) Equalisation Levy (e.g. India) Diverted Profits Tax (e.g. UK and Australia) Base-Erosion and Anti-abuse Tax (e.g. US)


Download ppt "DISCUSSION INPUT: ASPECTS OF FAIR AND SUSTAINABLE TAXATION"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google