Download presentation
1
Capacity Planning
2
Capacity Capacity (A): is the upper limit on the load that an operating unit can handle. Capacity (B): the upper limit of the quantity of a product (or product group) that an operating unit can produce (= the maximum level of output) Capacity (C): the amount of resource inputs available relative to output requirements at a particular time The basic questions in capacity handling are: What kind of capacity is needed? How much is needed? When is it needed? How does productivity relate to capacity?
3
Importance of Capacity Decisions
Impacts ability to meet future demands Affects operating costs Major determinant of initial costs Involves long-term commitment Affects competitiveness Affects ease of management Impacts long range planning
4
Examples of Capacity Measures
5
Capacity Designed capacity Effective capacity
maximum output rate or service capacity an operation, process, or facility is designed for = maximum obtainable output = best operating level Effective capacity Design capacity minus allowances such as personal time, maintenance, and scrap Actual output = Capacity used rate of output actually achieved. It cannot exceed effective capacity.
6
Capacity Efficiency and Capacity Utilization
Actual output Efficiency = Effective capacity Utilization = Design capacity
7
Numeric Example Design capacity = 10 tons/week
Effective capacity = 8 tons/week Actual output = 6 tons/week Actual output tons/week Efficiency = = = 75% Effective capacity tons/week Actual output tons/week Utilization = = = 60% Design capacity tons/week
8
Determinants of Effective Capacity
Facilities Product and service factors Process factors Human factors Operational factors Supply chain factors External factors
9
Key Decisions of Capacity Planning
Amount of capacity needed Timing of changes Need to maintain balance Extent of flexibility of facilities
10
Capacity Cushion level of capacity in excess of the average utilization rate or level of capacity in excess of the expected demand. extra demand intended to offset uncertainty Cushion = (designed capacity / capacity used) - 1 High cushion is needed: service industries high level of uncertainty in demand (in terms of both volume and product-mix) to permit allowances for vacations, holidays, supply of materials delays, equipment breakdowns, etc. if subcontracting, overtime, or the cost of missed demand is very high
11
Steps for Capacity Planning
Estimate future capacity requirements Evaluate existing capacity Identify alternatives Conduct financial analysis Assess key qualitative issues Select one alternative Implement alternative chosen Monitor results (feedback)
12
Sources of Uncertainty
Manufacturing Customer delivery Supplier performance Changes in demand
13
The „Make or Buy” problem
Available capacity Expertise Quality considerations Nature of demand Cost Risk
14
Developing Capacity Alternatives
Design flexibility into systems Take stage of life cycle into account (complementary product) Take a “big picture” approach to capacity changes Prepare to deal with capacity “chunks” Attempt to smooth out capacity requirements Identify the optimal operating level
15
Economies of Scale Economies of scale Diseconomies of scale
If the output rate is less than the optimal level, increasing output rate results in decreasing average unit costs Diseconomies of scale If the output rate is more than the optimal level, increasing the output rate results in increasing average unit costs
16
Evaluating Alternatives
Production units have an optimal rate of output for minimal cost. Minimum average cost per unit Average cost per unit Minimum cost Rate of output
17
Evaluating Alternatives II.
Minimum cost & optimal operating rate are functions of size of production unit. Small plant Medium plant Average cost per unit Large plant Output rate
18
Planning Service Capacity
Need to be near customers Capacity and location are closely tied Inability to store services Capacity must be matched with timing of demand Degree of volatility of demand Peak demand periods
19
Some examples of demand / capacity
20
Adapting capacity to demand through changes in workforce
PRODUCTION RATE (CAPACITY)
21
Adaptation with inventory
DEMAND Inventory reduction Inventory accumulation CAPACITY
22
Adaptation with subcontracting
DEMAND SUBCONTRACTING PRODUCTION (CAPACITY)
23
Adaptation with complementary product
DEMAND PRODUCTION (CAPACITY) DEMAND PRODUCTION (CAPACITY)
24
Seminar exercises Homogeneous Machine
25
Designed capacity in calendar time
CD= N ∙ sn ∙ sh ∙ mn ∙ 60 (mins / planning period) CD= designed capacity (mins / planning period) N = number of calendar days in the planning period (≈ 250 wdays/yr) sn= maximum number of shifts in a day (= 3 if dayshift + swing shift + nightshift) sh= number of hours in a shift (in a 3 shifts system, it is 8) mn= number of homogenous machine groups
26
Designed capacity in working minutes (machine minutes), with given work schedule
CD= N ∙ sn ∙ sh ∙ mn ∙ 60 (mins / planning period) CD= designed capacity (mins / planning period) N = number of working days in the planning period (≈ 250 wdays/yr) sn= number of shifts in a day (= 3 if dayshift + swing shift + nightshift) sh= number of hours in a shift (in a 3 shifts system, it is 8) mn= number of homogenous machine groups
27
Effective capacity in working minutes
CE = CD - tallowances (mins / planning period) CD= designed capacity tallowances = allowances such as personal time, maintenance, and scrap (mins / planning period)
28
The resources we can count with in product mix decisions
b = ∙ CE b = expected capacity CE = effective capacity = performance percentage Product types Expected Capacities Resources Resource utilization coefficients
29
Exercise 1.1 Set up the product-resource matrix using the following data! RU coefficients: a11: 10, a22: 20, a23: 30, a34: 10 The planning period is 4 weeks (there are no holidays in it, and no work on weekends) Work schedule: E1 and E2: 2 shifts, each is 8 hour long E3: 3 shifts Homogenous machines: 1 for E1 2 for E2 1 for E3 Maintenance time: only for E3: 5 hrs/week Performance rate: 90% for E1 and E3 80% for E2
30
Solution (bi) Ei = N ∙ sn ∙ sh ∙ mn ∙ 60 ∙
N=(number of weeks) ∙ (working days per week) E1 = 4 weeks ∙ 5 working days ∙ 2 shifts ∙ 8 hours per shift ∙ 60 minutes per hour ∙ 1 homogenous machine ∙ 0,9 performance = = 4 ∙ 5 ∙ 2 ∙ 8 ∙ 60 ∙ 1 ∙ 0,9 = minutes per planning period E2 = 4 ∙ 5 ∙ 2 ∙ 8 ∙ 60 ∙ 2 ∙ 0,8 = mins E3 = (4 ∙ 5 ∙ 3 ∙ 8 ∙ 60 ∙ 1 ∙ 0,9) – (5 hrs per week maintenance ∙ 60 minutes per hour ∙ 4 weeks) = – 1200 = mins
31
Solution (RP matrix) 10 20 30 T1 T2 T3 T4 b (mins/y) E1 17 280 E2
T1 T2 T3 T4 b (mins/y) E1 10 17 280 E2 20 30 30 720 E3 24 720
32
Exercise 1.2 Complete the corporate system matrix with the following marketing data: There are long term contract to produce at least: 50 T1 100 T2 120 T3 50 T4 Forecasts says the upper limit of the market is: units for T1 1 500 for T2 1 000 for T3 3 000 for T4 Unit prices: T1=100, T2=200, T3=330, T4=100 Variable costs: E1=5/min, E2=8/min, E3=11/min
33
Solution (CS matrix) 10 20 30 T1 T2 T3 T4 b (mins/y) E1 17 280 E2
T1 T2 T3 T4 b (mins/y) E1 10 17 280 E2 20 30 30 720 E3 24 720 MIN (pcs/y) 50 100 120 MAX (pcs/y) 10 000 1 500 1 000 3 000 p 200 330 f 40 90 -10
34
What is the optimal product mix to maximize revenues?
T3= ( ∙20-120∙30)/30= 837<MAX T4=24 720/10=2472<3000
35
What if we want to maximize profit?
The only difference is in T4 because of its negative contribution margin. T4=50
36
Exercise 2 6 3 2 4 1 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 b (hrs/y) E1 2 000 E2 3 000 E3
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 b (hrs/y) E1 6 2 000 E2 3 2 3 000 E3 4 1 000 E4 6 000 E5 1 5 000 MIN (pcs/y) 200 100 250 400 MAX (pcs/y) 20000 500 1000 2000 p (HUF/pcs) 50 f (HUF/pcs) 80 40 30 20 -10
37
Solution Revenue max. T1=333 T2=500 T3=400 T4=250 T5=900 T6=200
Contribution max. T1=333 T2=500 T3=400 T4=250 T5=966 T6=100
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.