1. MyFloridaMarketPlace Change Review Board (CRB)
Teleconference
July 8, 2008, 3:00 pm EDT
The toll free number is: (888) Conference Code:

2. Agenda Welcome / Introduction Review: Prioritized Change Requests
Reporting and Survey
Agency Training & Request for Facilities
Wrap-Up!

3. Agenda Welcome / Introduction Review: Prioritized Change Requests
Reporting and Survey
Agency Training & Request for Facilities
Wrap-Up!

4. Review Prioritized Change Requests Estimate Analysis
496
CR 42 Add accounting details to Analysis
376
CR 36 Make the Encumbrance number and the DO number the same
200
CR 40 IR Remove Accounting Validation on Rejected IRs
Done
CR 37 Mass Edit Purchasing Codes
Hour Estimate
Change Request

5. Review: Prioritized CRs
CR 37: Mass Edit Purchasing Codes (Buyer Code) - Completed
CR 46: Method of Procurement Updates - Completed
Please note that the team did modify the initial design which stated that the Method of Procurement (MOP) would not carry over on copied requisitions 
The design was changed to allow the MOP to carry over on copied requisitions 
The addition of the MOPs were implemented with CR 37

6. Review: Prioritized CRs
CR 37& 46 con’t
Combining these changes resulted in a cost savings of approximately 24 “change request” hours
Since MFMP was already engaged in a change affecting the MOP, the effort to add this has been reduced by an estimated 24 hours 
These new codes were available May 29, 2008, in MFMP

7. Review: Prioritized CRs
CR 40: Invoice Reconciliation Accounting Validation
Current Challenge: Currently if a customer is rejecting an IR, all of the accounting must be validated to get the IR in ‘Rejected’ status. Additionally, if a customer is disputing a line item, you also must validate the accounting before continuing. This creates additional work and time to a simple process. Agencies are requesting the following changes:
(1) when rejecting an IR, do not require that the accounting be validated, and;
(2) when disputing a line item, do not require that the accounting be validated.
Proposed Solution: Changes will be made so that accounting fields are not validated when a line item is disputed. These same changes will also impact the validation logic for a rejected IR (since the reject action disputes all line items). If a customer later selects to cancel a rejection or accept a previously disputed line item, then the accounting fields will required to be valid.

8. Review: Prioritized CRs
CR 36: Make the encumbrance number the direct order (DO) number
Current Challenge: Currently, the system assigns an encumbrance number just before an encumbered requisition is sent to FLAIR. Once the requisition is fully approved, a direct order (DO) number is assigned. As a result, there are two identifiers for an encumbered requisition and order: (1) a DO number or MA number and (2) an encumbrance number. In FLAIR, the encumbrance number is used for research. The DO or MA number is sent to the vendor and used in MyFloridaMarketPlace (MFMP) but is not maintained in FLAIR.
Proposed Solution: Encumbrance numbers are required to be six characters. Once this change request is implemented, the first encumbrance number assigned must be greater than the last DO number assigned (that is currently expected to be greater than ) so that DO numbers will not be duplicated. Once the encumbrance number reaches , alpha characters will be assigned (for example: A00000, A00001, A00002, ….).
When the encumbered requisition is fully approved and an order is generated, a DO number will be assigned starting with “DO” and then appended with the encumbrance number.
Encumbered and unencumbered requisitions will use the same incremental counter to reduce the frequency of creating duplicate DO numbers.

9. Review: Prioritized CRs
CR 42: Add Accounting Fields to Analysis
Current Challenge: Agencies are requesting to have searchable accounting data fields added in Analysis. Finance and Accounting need analysis reports to utilize fields such as object code, organization code and the category that requisitions and invoices are coded in order to track spending history and to accurately track the agency’s budget allotments.
Proposed Solution: Changes will be made so specific accounting fields are exported into Analysis for requisitions, purchase orders and invoices. Several fields will be available upon the implementation of this change request. Customers will have the ability to run reports in Analysis with the above accounting fields displayed on the page, row or column.
Organization code
Expansion option
Object Code
Budget Entity
Category
Category Year
State Program Standard
Grant
Grant Year
Contract
Contract Year
Project ID

10. Agenda Welcome / Introduction Review: Prioritized Change Requests
Reporting and Survey
Agency Training & Request for Facilities
Wrap-Up!

11. Reporting and Survey Reporting tools that exist:
Secure website reports
Analysis
Customized Agency Reports (Report Requests)
Online (System) Searches
Focus: to identify a single, optimal reporting solution for all Buyer customers
Purchasing,
F&A,
End users

12. Reporting and Survey Research completed to determine where we are:
Project Charter
Gap Analysis
Reporting Survey
Alternative Analysis

13. Reporting and Survey Project Charter
Purpose: to identify a single, optimal reporting solution for all Buyer customers (Purchasing, F&A, end users)
Approach:
to conduct research on current reporting environment
to identify current reporting “gaps”
to identify reporting alternatives/solutions

14. Reporting and Survey Gap Analysis
Purpose: to communicate functional requirements that are currently not resident in the MFMP reporting environment
Areas must be addressed in the optimal reporting environment
17 gaps identified
Gaps are categorized by severity
High
Medium
Low

15. Reporting and Survey Gap Analysis, cont. Identified gaps include:
Lack of agency awareness of reporting tools available (recommend: provide reporting training)
Reporting Job Aid out-of-date (recommend: update it! And create any supporting guidecards)
Lack of customer proficiency with using CSV files (recommend: create tutorials for obtaining CSV data, manipulating CSV data, etc.)
DMS/MFMP lack of true understanding of reporting needs from buyer customers (recommend: Reporting Survey!)

16. Reporting and Survey Reporting Survey
We intend to conduct an customer satisfaction survey, focus on reporting, in order to
measure the degree of customer satisfaction with reporting tools
measure frequency of use of reporting services by its customers
use this information to improve these services
help identify specific needs to be addressed in the reporting training
Intended audience: those employees who should have working knowledge of these reports
Purchasing
F&A
End users
Intended rollout: August 2008

17. Reporting and Survey Alternative Analysis
Identified 6 alternatives to best meet reporting needs, including:
SPSS,
enhancement of current state,
enhancement of SPURSView,
and FIS
Provide rationale to remain in current state (status quo)
Provide alternatives with recommendation, evaluation criteria with key findings, cost assessment, planning assumptions, and next steps to implement

18. Agenda Welcome / Introduction Review: Prioritized Change Requests
Reporting and Survey
Agency Training & Request for Facilities
Wrap-Up!

19. Agency Training & Request for Facilities
The DMS MFMP Team created training sessions that were conducted in May and June, 2008
MFMP Training sessions included:
New Requester (2 days) 5 sessions
Invoicing (1 day) 3 sessions
Analysis (1 day) 2 sessions
The classes were filled within the first week of registration and the average attendance was 80%

20. Agency Training & Request for Facilities
The team is now planning next fiscal year’s training activities. We have sent requests to several agencies requesting to use facilities at these statewide locations:
Tampa – 08/08
Ft. Lauderdale – 10/08
Jacksonville – 11/08
Orlando – 01/09
Pensacola – 03/09
Ft. Myers – 04/09
Miami – 05/09
Facilities need to have computer stations (one for each participant) in addition to an instructor station with an LCD projector
Facilities must also allow state employees from various agencies to participate

21. Agency Training & Request for Facilities
Local training will continue monthly in Tallahassee, beginning August, 2008
New registrations for all locations will be posted to the toolkit soon and a communication will be sent out

22. Agenda Welcome / Introduction Review: Prioritized Change Requests
Reporting and Survey
Agency Training & Request for Facilities
Wrap-Up!

23. Wrap Up! Questions/Comments Next CRB Meeting – September 2008
Contact Us