Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: Correlation with ex vivo measurement.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: Correlation with ex vivo measurement."— Presentation transcript:

1 Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: Correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis  Xian M. Pan, MD, David Saloner, PhD, Linda M. Reilly, MD, Jon C. Bowersox, MD, Stephen P. Murray, MD, Charles M. Anderson, MD, PhD, Gretchen A.W. Gooding, MD, Joseph H. Rapp, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery  Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995) DOI: /S (95) Copyright © 1995 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

2 Fig. 1 High-resolution MRIs of endarterectomy specimen. A, One slice through ICA and ECA, in longitudinal axis of specimen. B, Transverse slice through specimen. Journal of Vascular Surgery  , 82-89DOI: ( /S (95) ) Copyright © 1995 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

3 Fig. 1 High-resolution MRIs of endarterectomy specimen. A, One slice through ICA and ECA, in longitudinal axis of specimen. B, Transverse slice through specimen. Journal of Vascular Surgery  , 82-89DOI: ( /S (95) ) Copyright © 1995 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

4 Fig. 2 Comparison by grade of stenosis of specimen with MRA( r = 0.76; p < 0.001) (A), DUS ( r = 0.80; p < 0.001) (B), and XRA ( r = 0.56; p < 0.005) (C). All are Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Journal of Vascular Surgery  , 82-89DOI: ( /S (95) ) Copyright © 1995 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

5 Fig. 2 Comparison by grade of stenosis of specimen with MRA( r = 0.76; p < 0.001) (A), DUS ( r = 0.80; p < 0.001) (B), and XRA ( r = 0.56; p < 0.005) (C). All are Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Journal of Vascular Surgery  , 82-89DOI: ( /S (95) ) Copyright © 1995 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

6 Fig. 2 Comparison by grade of stenosis of specimen with MRA( r = 0.76; p < 0.001) (A), DUS ( r = 0.80; p < 0.001) (B), and XRA ( r = 0.56; p < 0.005) (C). All are Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Journal of Vascular Surgery  , 82-89DOI: ( /S (95) ) Copyright © 1995 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: Correlation with ex vivo measurement."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google