1. RED

2. RED Discussion on SP:s CoIE will make application oriented input
Careful to modify today structure
Long term understandability is important
Application domains and technology domain
4 technology subprograms and 4 application subprograms’
How to map ASP to SRA?
Artemisia lack company representation in several areas e.g. Healthcare?
ARTEMIS Industry Associaition
Title Presentation -

3. RED
What are the added value of Artemis in competition with other people handling healthcare
Should healthcare be taken away
Ambient assistive living -
Automation should appear in SP4 - Manufacturing, automation and logistics
Energy should appear somewhere - SP7 in some way
Where is green car??
Energy related embedded system
ARTEMIS Industry Associaition
Title Presentation -

4. RED Is vertical or horizontal closer to the market Who is the customer
Are the end users part of Artemis or consortia
Naming of SP:s are they understandable and clear
Leave “Embedded system for ... “out
“Environment” should go into SP7 name
ARTEMIS Industry Associaition
Title Presentation -

5. RED
SP1 Open to a wide number of application, today only automotive and aerospace
Remove “relevant”
SP2 Embedded system for Health
SP3 Smart environments <-> Internet of things??
Extend description to automative, energy grids, infrastructures, ....
ES for? Smart environments
SP4 Manufacturing, automation and logistics
SP5 Computing platforms for embedded systems
SP6 Security and critical infrastructure protection
infrastructure should be defined in the description
SP7 Please add energy here
SP8 Human centric design of embedded system
NEw ES for operation and maintenance
ARTEMIS Industry Associaition
Title Presentation -

6. Thank you for your attention