1. Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Specialty Networks (WSN)
Submission Title: 6 GHz NPRM and EC RLAN Discussion
Date Submitted: January 2018
Source: Tim Harrington, Pro-ID Consulting
Contact:
Voice: ,
Re: Enhanced Impulse Radio Technical Group
Abstract: Discussion of options to deal with proposal of 6 GHz RLAN
Purpose: Discuss options to counter effort by RLAN to move into 6 GHz with high power RLAN. Also to discuss mitigation options to propose to the FCC, ECC, and RLAN community.
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P
Slide 1
Slide 1
Page 1

2. How bad is the problem? Applications Affected? 1,2,3 Consumer Apps
Key fob
Smartphone
“Follow me” apps
POS transactions
Industrial Apps
Tool tracking
Automated assembly
Sports Tracking

3. Possibilities Should 1% duty cycle be written into the rules
RLAN defends using Monte Carlo simulation for 1% duty cycle
Less Power for RLAN centered at 6.55 GHz
More Power for Part and UWB
Frequency Options:
Extend Band for Part to higher band – but military above 7.250
No Mobile Hot spots
Or perhaps only low power hotspots?
Mobile devices only use (Mobile or Fixed) must turn off 6 GHz on command
Will allow for a device to detect and control rogue devices
Could be used to protect vehicles
Mobile devices only use 6 GHz on command from AP
Other Options?