1. EUPAN Troika Secretariat 26 March 2007, Berlin MidTermProgramme (MTP)

2. How do you assess the significance of HRWG contributions to
Questionnaire on EUPAN WG – members’ assessment on the implementation of the Mid Term Programme 2006 – 2007
How do you assess the significance of HRWG contributions to
the priority areas or “common coordinated action plans” listed
in the MTP under these headings:
The way EU member states work towards the Lisbon objectives:
7 x very important 20 x substantial 4 x marginal
The reduction of administrative burdens…..
9 x very important 7 x substantial 15 x marginal
Efficiency of public administration
10 x very important 17 x substantial 4 x marginal
Working towards European User Satisfaction Indices (only IPSG and eGov)
7 x very important 8 x substantial 5 x marginal

3. How do you assess the significance of HRWG activities with
Questionnaire on EUPAN WG – members’ assessment on the implementation of the Mid Term Programme 2006 – 2007
How do you assess the significance of HRWG activities with
regard to HRWG topics listed in the MTP under these headings:
1) Strategic Human Resources Management in the Public Administration
7 x very important 5 x substantial 0 x marginal
2) Leadership Development and Succession Planning in the Public Administration
6 x very important 6 x substantial 0 x marginal
3) Modernization of Public Administration
6 x very important 6 x substantial 1 x marginal

4. How do you assess the significance of HRWG activities with
Questionnaire on EUPAN WG – members’ assessment on the implementation of the Mid Term Programme 2006 – 2007
How do you assess the significance of HRWG activities with
regard to HRWG topics listed in the MTP under these headings:
4) Ethics and Integrity
6 x very important 5 x substantial 1 x marginal
5) Pensions in the public sector
0 x very important 8 x substantial 3 x marginal
6) Training of civil servants
2 x very important 6 x substantial 4 x marginal

5. How do you assess the significance of IPSG activities with
Questionnaire on EUPAN WG – members’ assessment on the implementation of the Mid Term Programme 2006 – 2007
How do you assess the significance of IPSG activities with
regard to IPSG topics listed in the MTP under these headings:
1) Benchmarking and Best Practice
9 x very important 5 x substantial 1 x marginal
2) CAF (Common Assessment Framework)
12 x very important 1 x substantial 2 x marginal
3) Communication/Knowledge Sharing and Management
7 x very important 4 x substantial 3 x marginal
4) Quality Conferences
12 x very important 3 x substantial 0 x marginal

6. How do you assess the significance of EGOVWG activities with
Questionnaire on EUPAN WG – members’ assessment on the implementation of the Mid Term Programme 2006 – 2007
How do you assess the significance of EGOVWG activities with
regard to EGOVWG topics listed in the MTP under these
headings:
1) Interoperability, inter & intra governmental collaboration and pan- European services
1 x very important 2 x substantial 2 x marginal
2) A focus on users needs with attention to benefits for citizens and the impact of e-government
2 x very important 1 x substantial 2 x marginal
3) Organisational changes, skills and the role of leadership required in achieving the benefits that effective use of ICT can bring to public administrations
1 x very important 1 x substantial 3 x marginal