1. Possible reforms to the adversary system

2. Relaxation of Rules of Evidence
Strict rules of evidence and procedure exist to __________________to a case from ___________________________________used evidence. BUT They could be _________________ to allow for other pertinent information to be put to the court that could affect the outcome of a trial (eg hearsay, past convictions etc) TIMELY RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES EFFECTIVE ACCESS TO LEGAL SYSTEM

3. Increased role of the judge
The judge currently is responsible for ensuring the rules and procedures are adhered to. They cannot _____________________ or introduce new ideas BUT The powers of the judge could be __________________________to become more involved in pre-trial and trial procedures. Including being able to call witnesses and ask questions. An increased role would allow a judge to ________________________________. Eg: Judges controlling custody cases in Sydney.

4. Making legal representation more attainable
Legal representation is essential in order to assist parties in following the________________________________________ BUT Legal representation is __________. Increased availability of ___________________________through increased government funding would result in more people being able to gain access to legal representation. _______________________________________________

5. Increased funding for the legal system
Devoting more resources to the system will result in more _____________________________. Providing more courts would be a solution. The use of ______________________________________can assist courts with dispensing cases quickly. (electronic filing, video conferencing, online transfer of documents.) _________________________________

6. Further reforms Greater use of ____________
Less reliance on ______________________________
Greater assistance for __________________________
_________________________